Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Immunotherapy in Combination with Chemotherapy for Patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: Current Diagnosis, Biomarkers, and Treatment Options with Future Perspectives

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy characterized by rapid proliferation, early dissemination, acquired therapy resistance, and poor prognosis. Early diagnosis of SCLC is crucial since most patients present with advanced/metastatic disease, limiting the potential for curative treatment. While SCLC exhibits initial responsiveness to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, treatment resistance commonly emerges, leading to a five-year overall survival rate of up to 10%. New effective biomarkers, early detection, and advancements in therapeutic strategies are crucial for improving survival rates and reducing the impact of this devastating disease. This review aims to comprehensively summarize current knowledge on diagnostic options, well-known and emerging biomarkers, and SCLC treatment strategies and discuss future perspectives on this aggressive malignancy.

Efficacy and safety of first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in treating patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background

Despite numerous immunotherapy and chemotherapy regimens available for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), it remains unclear which regimen is the most effective and safest; relative studies comparing such regimens are scarce.

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of first-line immunotherapy combinations with chemotherapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. In addition, for the first time, comparisons among the first-line systemic regimens on OS and PFS in ES-SCLC by each time node were made.

Methods

Databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Google Scholars, and ClinicalTrials.gov, and major international conferences were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding comparing immunotherapy combinations with chemotherapy as first-line treatments for patients with advanced ES-SCLC from inception to 1 November. Hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) were generated for dichotomous variants by RStudio 4.2.1. The outcomes comprised overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events of grade 3 or higher (Grade ≥ 3 AEs).

Results

Eventually, a total of nine RCTs reporting 4,352 individuals with nine regimens were enrolled. The regimens were ipilimumabnu (Ipi), atezolizumab (Atez), durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Durv-Trem), durvalumab (Durv), pembrolizumab (Pemb), adebrelimab (Adeb), serplulimab (Serp), atezolizumab plus tiragolumab (Atez-Tira), and nivolumab (Nivo). With regard to OS, serplulimab (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.81) was found to yield the best OS benefit when compared with chemotherapy. Meanwhile, serplulimab had the highest probability (46.11%) for better OS. Furthermore, compared with chemotherapy, serplulimab significantly increased the OS rate from the 6th to the 21st month. With regard to PFS, serplulimab (HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.59) was found to yield the best PFS benefit when compared with chemotherapy. Simultaneously, serplulimab had the highest probability (94.48%) for better PFS. Serplulimab was also a long-lasting first-line regimen in both OS and PFS from a longitudinal perspective. In addition, there was no significant difference among the various treatment options for ORR and grade ≥3 AEs.

Conclusion

Considering OS, PFS, ORR, and safety profiles, serplulimab with chemotherapy should be recommended as the best therapy for patients with ES-SCLC. Certainly, more head-to-head studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022373291.

Effectiveness, safety and pharmacokinetics of Polo-like kinase 1 inhibitors in tumor therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To provide a systematic review of existing meta-analysis on the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of the novel Polo-like kinase-1 (Plk1) inhibitors in various tumor treatments, and assess the methodological quality and the strength of evidence of the included meta-analysis.

Methods

The Medline, PubMed, Embase, etc. were searched and updated on 30 June 2022. 22 eligible clinical trials involving a total of 1256 patients were included for analyses. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) compared the efficacy or safety, or both of any Plk1 inhibitors with placebo (active or inert) in participants. To be included, studies had to be RCTs, quasi-RCTs, and nonrandomized comparative studies.

Results

A meta-analysis of two trials reported progression-free survival (PFS) of the overall population (effect size (ES), 1.01; 95% confidence intervals (CIs), 0.73-1.30, I² =0.0%, P<0.001) and overall survival (OS) of the overall population (ES, 0.91; 95% CIs, 0.31-1.50, I² =77.6%, P=0.003). 18 adverse events (AEs) reflected that the possibility of occurrence of AEs in the Plk1 inhibitors group was 1.28 times higher than in the control group (odds ratios (ORs), 1.28; 95% CIs,1.02-1.61). The results of meta-analysis showed that the incidence of AEs in the nervous system was the highest (ES, 0.202; 95% CIs, 0.161-0.244), followed by blood system (ES, 0.190; 95% CIs, 0.178-0.201) and digestive system (ES, 0.181; 95% CIs, 0.150-0.213). Rigosertib (ON 01910.Na) was associated with a decreased risk of AEs in digestive system (ES, 0.103; 95% CIs, 0.059-0.147), but BI 2536 and Volasertib (BI 6727) increased risk of AEs in blood system (ES, 0.399; 95% CIs, 0.294-0.504). Five eligible studies reported the pharmacokinetic parameters of the low dosage (100 mg) cohort and the high dosage (200 mg) cohort, and there was no statistical difference in the total plasma clearance, terminal half-life and apparent volume of distribution at steady state.

Conclusions

Plk1 inhibitors work better in improving OS and they are well tolerated, effective and safe in reducing the severity of illness while improving the quality of life, especially in patients with non-specific tumors, respiratory system tumors, musculoskeletal system tumors, and urinary system tumors. However, they fail to prolong the PFS. From the vertical whole level analysis, compared to other systems in the body, Plk1 inhibitors should be avoided as far as possible for the treatment of tumors related to the blood circulatory system, digestive system and nervous system, which were attributed to the intervention of Plk1 inhibitors associated with an increased risk of AEs in these systems. The toxicity caused by immunotherapy should be carefully considered. Conversely, a horizontal comparison of three different types of Plk1 inhibitors suggested that Rigosertib (ON 01910.Na) might be relatively suitable for the treatment of tumors associated with the digestive system, while Volasertib (BI 6727) might be even less suitable for the treatment of tumors associated with the blood circulation system. Additionally, in the dose selection of Plk1 inhibitors, the low dose of 100 mg should be preferred, and meanwhile, it can also ensure the pharmacokinetic efficacy that is indistinguishable from the high dose of 200 mg.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022343507.

Exosomal miR-211-5p regulates glucose metabolism, pyroptosis, and immune microenvironment of melanoma through GNA15

Despite the unprecedented advancement of cancer treatment, the prognosis for patients with metastatic stage of cancer remains poor. The challenge that underlines this clinical dilemma is the complexity of metastasis. The conventional experiment-driven discovery approaches (the "wet lab") yield overly simplified one-to-one mechanistic relationships that are inept of elucidating the complexity of metastasis. Metastasis research also suffers from the knowledge and skill deficiency of the individual investigators. The importance of the present study is the demonstration that the "dry-lab-driven discovery and wet-lab validation" approach can improve the efficiency of studying complex biological behaviors, and can yield more reliable, objective and comprehensive mechanistic findings that are have clinical significance. Specifically, we applied this approach to study the mechanisms that underline the involvement of exosomal miRNAs in transferring the metastatic capability between heterogenous melanoma cancer cells. We show that the highly metastatic melanoma tumor cells (POL) can transfer their metastatic competency to the low-metastatic melanoma tumor cells (OL) by exosomal miR-211-5p. The oncogenic activity of miR-211-5p is mediated by the target gene guanine nucleotide-binding protein subunit alpha-15 (GNA15) through modifying the immune function of the tumor microenvironment extrinsically; as well as through inhibiting pyroptosis and augmenting glycolysis within OL cells intrinsically. In addition, we show that exosomal sorting of miR-211-5p is like selective and is subjected to regulation by a transcriptional feedback loop between miR-211-5p and zinc finger FYVE-type containing 26 (ZFYVE26). Furthermore, the "8-genes pyroptosis Risk model" derived from LASSO regression analysis was verified as an independent prognostic factor for melanoma.

Nano Drug Delivery System for Tumor Immunotherapy: Next-Generation Therapeutics

Tumor immunotherapy is an artificial stimulation of the immune system to enhance anti-cancer response. It has become a powerful clinical strategy for treating cancer. The number of immunotherapy drug approvals has been increasing in recent years, and many treatments are in clinical and preclinical stages. Despite this progress, the special tumor heterogeneity and immunosuppressive microenvironment of solid tumors made immunotherapy in the majority of cancer cases difficult. Therefore, understanding how to improve the intratumoral enrichment degree and the response rate of various immunotherapy drugs is key to improve efficacy and control adverse reactions. With the development of materials science and nanotechnology, advanced biomaterials such as nanoparticle and drug delivery systems like T-cell delivery therapy can improve effectiveness of immunotherapy while reducing the toxic side effects on non-target cells, which offers innovative ideas for improving immunity therapeutic effectiveness. In this review, we discuss the mechanism of tumor cell immune escape and focus on current immunotherapy (such as cytokine immunotherapy, therapeutic monoclonal antibody immunotherapy, PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, CAR-T therapy, tumor vaccine, oncolytic virus, and other new types of immunity) and its challenges as well as the latest nanotechnology (such as bionic nanoparticles, self-assembled nanoparticles, deformable nanoparticles, photothermal effect nanoparticles, stimuli-responsive nanoparticles, and other types) applications in cancer immunotherapy.

Paraneoplastic myelitis associated with durvalumab treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer

Paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes(PNSs) caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) is rare and requires clinicians to differentiate between disease progression and immune-related adverse effects(irAEs). We hereby report the case of immune-related myelitis accompanied by positive paraneoplastic autoantibodies following durvalumab treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). A 70-year-old Chinese woman with ES-SCLC was administered durvalumab with etoposid-platinum(EP) as first-line treatment. Four cycles after treatment with EP plus ICI, she developed immune-related myelitis with positive paraneoplastic autoantibodies (CV2, SOX1, ZIC4). Spinal MRI showed diffuse abnormal signal shadow in the cervicothoracic spinal cord. She was discontinued for chemotherapy, and treated with high-dose steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis, maintenance therapy with steroids resulted in a favorable neurologic outcome. This is the first report of durvalumab-related PNSs. We supposed that the development of paraneoplastic myelitis was causally related to immune activation by durvalumab. Prompt diagnosis and therapeutic intervention are essential for the effective treatment of paraneoplastic myelitis.

Immune Check Point Inhibitors and Immune-Related Adverse Events in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a malignant solid tumor. In recent years, although immune check point inhibitors (ICIs) have achieved important advances in the treatment of SCLC, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have occurred at the same time during the therapeutic period. Some irAEs lead to dose reduction or treatment rejection. The immune microenvironment of SCLC is complicated, therefore, understanding irAEs associated with ICIs is of great importance and necessity for the clinical management of SCLC. However, the lack of comprehensive understanding of irAEs in patients with SCLC remains remarkable. This review aims to provide an up-to-date overview of ICIs and their associated irAEs in patients with SCLC based on present clinical data.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Immunotherapeutic Regimens with PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors for Previously Untreated Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Improving therapeutic strategies for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) remains a challenge. To date, no reports have directly compared the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum–etoposide (ICIs+EP) with platinum–irinotecan (IP) or directly compared different ICIs+EP for previously untreated ES-SCLC. This study used a Bayesian approach for network meta-analysis to compare efficacy and safety between ICIs+EP and IP and between each pair of three ICIs+EP. The six treatment arms were: pembrolizumab plus platinum–etoposide (Pem+EP), durvalumab plus platinum–etoposide (Dur+EP), atezolizumab plus platinum–etoposide (Atz+EP), platinum–amrubicin (AP), IP, and platinum–etoposide (EP). No significant differences in overall survival were observed between ICIs+EP and IP and between each pair of three ICIs+EP. The incidence of ≥grade 3 adverse events (G3-AEs) was significantly higher in ICIs+EP than IP, whereas no significant difference was found in G3-AEs between each pair of three ICIs+EP. The incidence of ≥grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was significantly higher in ICIs+EP than IP, whereas the incidence of ≥grade 3 diarrhea was significantly lower in ICIs+EP than IP. These findings will help clinicians better select treatment strategies for ES-SCLC.

Corrigendum to "Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Immunotherapy in Combination with Chemotherapy for Patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis"

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1155/2020/2368164.].