1
|
Wang H, Wu S, D'Oria M, Pan D, Hu L, Zhang H, Guo J, Gu Y. Comparison of Different Endovascular Treatments of Femoropopliteal Artery In-Stent Restenosis: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 104:205-216. [PMID: 38492725 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.12.081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) sought to evaluate the efficacy of different endovascular treatments for femoropopliteal artery in-stent restenosis (FP-ISR). METHODS PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of science for clinical trials from database inception to March 31, 2023, with no language restrictions to retrieve randomized controlled trials or cohort studies evaluating the impact of any kind of endovascular treatments for FP-ISR. Pair-wise meta-analysis and Bayesian NMA were performed to pool the outcome estimates different endovascular treatments. The primary end points under consideration were primary patency rates at both 6-month and 12-month follow-up. RESULTS A total of 15 studies with 1,424 patients were ultimately enrolled to be analyzed, 7 types of endovascular treatment were identified for comparison. In terms of primary patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 6-month and12-month follow-up, the direct meta-analysis findings showed that drug-coated balloons (DCB) and covered stent (CS) are considerably superior to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), Excimer laser atherectomy (ELA) + DCB is significantly better than DCB. According to the meta-analysis based on Bayesian theory, during the 6-month and 12-months follow-up, we could not find significant difference between the different treatments in terms of the primary patency and the freedom from TLR, based on the surface values under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), CS was considered the best treatment in terms of primary patency (6 months SUCRA = 85.2; 12 months SUCRA = 78.9) and freedom from TLR (6 months SUCRA = 84.9; 12 months SUCRA = 70.9); directional atherectomy + POBA may lead to higher survival rate at 12 months (SUCRA = 89.1) than others treatments; in addition, both ELA + POBA and ELA + DCB have higher limb salvage than POBA. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this NMA suggest that CS showed positive encouraging results in primary patency and TLR in FP-ISR at 6 and 12 months. However, due to the potential influence of certain confounding factors, the long-term results necessitate validation through numerous randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Wang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - SenSen Wu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Mario D'Oria
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Dikang Pan
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Lefan Hu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hanyu Zhang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jianming Guo
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yongquan Gu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yu C, Tang W, Ren T, Chen Q, Lu R, Gao Y. Network Meta-Analysis of All Available Regimens Based on Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty and Laser Atherectomy for Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis. J Endovasc Ther 2024; 31:390-399. [PMID: 36189843 DOI: 10.1177/15266028221125581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty and laser atherectomy (LA) have been frequently utilized to treat femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR); however, no studies have concurrently compared available regimens, including DCB, LA+DCB, and LA + plain balloon angioplasty (PB). Therefore, we conducted this network meta-analysis to determine whether there were significant differences in outcomes among these regimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library to identify all randomized controlled trials comparing DCB or LA-based regimes with POBA or each other for treating femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR) from their inception until March 2021. The primary outcome measure was binary restenosis, and secondary outcome measures were target lesion revascularization (TLR) and mortality, evaluated at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed using Aggregate Data Drug Information System (ADDIS) 1.4 software, and all data were graphically summarized using Microsoft Excel software. RESULTS The final analysis included 11 studies, of which 6 studies compared DCB with PB, 2 studies compared PB vs LA+PB, 2 studies compared DCB vs LA+DCB, and 1 study compared LA+DCB with LA+PB. DCB was better than PB in decreasing binary restenosis at 6 (odds ratio [OR]: 0.22, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.04-0.91) and 12 (OR: 0.26, 95% CrI: 0.12-0.50) months. DCB was associated with lower TLR than PB at 6 months (OR: 0.31, 95% CrI: 0.13-0.69). LA+DCB was also superior to PB in treating binary restenosis at 12 months (OR: 6.10, 95% CrI: 1.94-24.41) and TLR at 6 months (OR: 5.32, 95% CrI: 1.43-28.06). There was no statistical difference in mortality between PB, DCB, and LA+PB. DCB and LA+DCB were the first 2 options for reducing binary restenosis and TLR. CONCLUSION The current network meta-analysis demonstrates that both DCB and LA+DCB are superior to PB alone, and that DCB and LA+DCB may be the preferred treatment options for reducing binary restenosis and TLR. CLINICAL IMPACT The treatment for femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains challenging clinical practice. One important reason is that no optimal treatment strategy was available. Drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCB) and laser atherectomy (LA) have been extensively utilized to treat ISR; however, different combinations of these treatments further confused the clinicians' choices. This network meta-analysis systematically investigated the difference between the currently available treatments regarding therapeutic effects and safety, indicating that DCB and LA+DCB may be the optimal treatment for decreasing the risk of binary restenosis and target lesion revascularization. The results of the current network meta-analysis help to resolve the confusion of clinicians in making the decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaowen Yu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu City, China
| | - Wenbo Tang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu City, China
| | - Tiancai Ren
- Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu City, China
| | - Qiwei Chen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu City, China
| | - Ran Lu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu City, China
| | - Yong Gao
- Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu City, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cui HJ, Wu YF. The Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloons and Drug-Eluting Stents in Infrapopliteal Revascularization: A Meta-analysis. J Endovasc Ther 2024:15266028231222385. [PMID: 38183240 DOI: 10.1177/15266028231222385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of drug-coated balloon (DCB) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) to standard endovascular techniques like percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and bare metal stent (BMS) for treating infrapopliteal artery disease. METHODS Including 8 DCB trials and 4 DES trials, this meta-analysis of 12 recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is comprehensive. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science of Web, Cochrane, and PubMed for this meta-analysis. We searched these databases for papers from their inception to February 2023. We also analyzed the references given in the listed studies and any future study that cited them. No language or publication date restrictions were applied to the 12 RCTs. The experimental group includes 8 DCB studies and 4 DES investigations, the DCB group is primarily concerned with the paclitaxel devices, whereas the DES group is preoccupied with the "-limus" devices. Key clinical outcomes in this study were primary patency and binary restenosis rates. This study's secondary outcomes are late lumen loss (LLL), clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), limb amputation, and all-cause mortality. The evidence quality was assessed using Cochrane risk-of-bias. The PROSPERO registration number for this study is CRD42023462038. FINDINGS Only 108 of 1152 publications found satisfied qualifying criteria and contained data. All 13 RCTs have low to moderate bias. Drug-coated balloons and DESs were compared in the excluded study. The analysis comprised 2055 participants from 12 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria, including 1417 DCB patients and 638 DES patients. Drug-coated balloons outperform traditional methods in short-term monitoring of primary patency, binary restenosis, and CD-TLR. The benefits fade over time, and the 2 techniques had similar major amputation rates, mortality rates, and LLL. Drug-eluting stents outperform conventional procedures in primary patency, binary restenosis, and CD-TLR during medium-term to short-term follow-up. Comparing the 2 methods, major and minor amputations, death rate, and LLL were similar. CONCLUSION Comparison of DES and DCB with PTA or BMS shows that DES had better follow-up results. DCB has positive short-term results, but long-term effects differ, however, more research is needed to determine when DES and DCB should be used in medical procedures. CLINICAL IMPACT The provision of additional evidence to substantiate the advancement of drug-coated balloon (DCB) therapy in the treatment of lower limb arteriosclerosis obliterans, particularly in the below-the-knee area characterized by high calcium load and significant occlusion, is comparable in efficacy to conventional procedures. This finding is advantageous for the progress of interventional revascularization. The advancement and efficacy of DCB have resulted in improved treatment outcomes for medical practitioners in clinical settings. Our research incorporates the most recent randomized experiments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong-Jie Cui
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Ying-Feng Wu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vadalà G, Ceresa F, Costa F, Bottari A, Roscitano G, Patanè F, Micari A. In-stent restenosis of superficial femoral artery: use all arrows in the quiver. Oxf Med Case Reports 2022; 2022:omac108. [PMID: 36299675 PMCID: PMC9589465 DOI: 10.1093/omcr/omac108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a common superficial femoral artery (SFA) stenting complication, occurring in more than one third of patients within 2–3 years after the index procedure. Moreover, there is no standard treatment for ISR, and although many options are available, there is still limited data regarding its optimal management. We report a paradigmatic case report of a patient complaining of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease, underwent multiple endovascular revascularizations for recurrent femoro-popliteal ISR. A step-by-step approach was followed. At the time of the first presentation, the ISR was treated by drug-eluting balloon (DEB) angioplasty. The repeated ISR was treated by laser debulking, achieving a good angiographic result. Finally, after the third repeated restenosis, a combined approach with laser debulking and DEB angioplasty guaranteed a good acute angiographic result. Long-term duplex-scan follow-up demonstrated the good patency of the femoro-popliteal target lesion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Vadalà
- Cardiovascular Department, Universitary Hospital "Policlinico P. Giaccone", Palermo, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Ceresa
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Surgery, Papardo Hospital, Messina, Italy
| | - Francesco Costa
- Department of Biomedical, Dental, Morphological and Functional Imaging Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Antonio Bottari
- Department of Biomedical, Dental, Morphological and Functional Imaging Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Roscitano
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Specialities, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Francesco Patanè
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Surgery, Papardo Hospital, Messina, Italy
| | - Antonio Micari
- Correspondence address. Interventional Cardiology Department, Policlinic G. Martino, University of Messina, Via C. Valeria 1, Messina 98100, Italy. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Montelione N, Catanese V, Nenna A, Jawabra M, Verghi E, Loreni F, Nappi F, Lusini M, Mastroianni C, Jiritano F, Serraino GF, Mastroroberto P, Codispoti FA, Chello M, Spinelli F, Stilo F. The Diagnostic Value of Circulating Biomarkers and Role of Drug-Coated Balloons for In-Stent Restenosis in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12092207. [PMID: 36140608 PMCID: PMC9498042 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12092207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is an increasingly pathological condition that commonly affects the femoropopliteal arteries. The current fashionable treatment is percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), often with stenting. However, the in-stent restenosis (ISR) rate after the stenting of the femoropopliteal (FP) district remains high. Many techniques have been proposed for the treatment of femoropopliteal ISR, such as intravascular brachytherapy, laser atherectomy, second stenting and drug-coated balloons angioplasty (DCB). DCB showed a significantly lower rate of restenosis and target lesions revascularization (TLR) compared to conventional PTA. However, further studies and multi-center RCTs with dedicated long-term follow-up are needed to verify the true efficiency of this approach. Nowadays, the correlation between PAD and inflammation biomarkers is well known. Multiple studies have shown that proinflammatory markers (such as C-reactive proteins) and the high plasma levels of microRNA could predict the outcomes after stent placement. In particular, circulating microRNA-320a, microRNA-3937, microRNA-642a-3p and microRNA-572 appear to hold promise in diagnosing ISR in patients with PAD, but also as predictors of stent patency. This narrative review intends to summarize the current knowledge on the value of circulating biomarkers as predictors of ISR and to foster the scientific debate on the advantages of using DCB in the treatment of ISR in the FP district.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nunzio Montelione
- Vascular Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Catanese
- Vascular Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Antonio Nenna
- Cardiac Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Mohamad Jawabra
- Cardiac Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuele Verghi
- Cardiac Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Loreni
- Cardiac Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Nappi
- Cardiac Surgery, Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint-Denis, 93200 Paris, France
| | - Mario Lusini
- Cardiac Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Ciro Mastroianni
- Cardiac Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Jiritano
- Cardiovascular Surgery, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Massimo Chello
- Cardiac Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Spinelli
- Vascular Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Stilo
- Vascular Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
He Z, Wang H, Lin F, Ding W, Chen K, Zhang Z. The safety and efficacy of different endovascular treatments for in-stent restenosis of the femoropopliteal artery: A network meta-analysis. Vasc Med 2022; 27:239-250. [PMID: 35164613 DOI: 10.1177/1358863x211070327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Femoropopliteal artery in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a challenging treatment. We performed a network meta-analysis (NWM) for femoropopliteal artery ISR to explore the safety and efficacy of endovascular therapeutic strategies. Methods: The MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were used as data sources. The network meta-analysis (NWM) approach used random-effects models based on the frequentist framework. We compared technical success rate, primary patency, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and major amputation at the 12-month follow-up for femoropopliteal artery ISR. Results: In total, 14 eligible studies (10 prospective and four retrospective; 1348 patients; and eight treatment modalities - standard balloon angioplasty (SBA), drug-coated balloon (DCB), peripheral cutting balloon angioplasty (PCBA), Viabahn endoprosthesis (VBE), directional atherectomy (DA), excimer laser atherectomy (ELA), and combinations - were included. The primary patency rates (at 6 months) were significantly higher for DCB and ELA+DCB than for SBA and ELA+SBA. ELA+DCB had higher primary patency rates (at 12 months) than ELA+SBA and SBA. The technical success rates were significantly lower for DCB and SBA than for VBE. The major amputation rates were significantly lower for ELA+DCB than for DCB. Based on the surface values under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), ELA+DCB was considered the best treatment in terms of primary patency at 6 months (SUCRA = 91.1), primary patency at 12 months (SUCRA = 82.3), and TLR (SUCRA = 83.4). Conclusion: ELA+DCB showed positive encouraging results in primary patency (6, 12 months), TLR, and major amputation in femoropopliteal ISR. The efficacy and safety of ELA+DCB are worthy of further investigation. (PROSPERO Registration No.: CRD42021246674).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhipeng He
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Haoran Wang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Feng Lin
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Wenjie Ding
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Ke Chen
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhigong Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu MY, Li W, Guo X, Zhang Z, Liu B, Yu H, Zhang Z, Chen X, Feng H. Percutaneous Mechanical Atherectomy Plus Thrombectomy Using the Rotarex®S Device Followed by a Drug-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery In-stent Restenosis: A Prospective Single-Center, Single-Arm Efficacy Trial (PERMIT-ISR Trial). Front Surg 2021; 8:671849. [PMID: 34595204 PMCID: PMC8477580 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.671849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Studies investigating debulking devices with drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in the treatment of femoropopliteal (FP) artery in-stent restenosis (ISR) are limited. We aimed to evaluate the safety and midterm outcome of percutaneous mechanical atherectomy plus thrombectomy (MATH) using the Rotarex®S (Straub Medical, Wangs, Switzerland) catheter followed by a DCB in the treatment of FP-ISR. Methods: This study was a single-center single-arm trial. Patients with symptomatic (Rutherford category 2–5) de novo restenosis lesions of FP-ISR were treated with MATH and subsequent DCB. From June 2016 to May 2018, 59 patients with FP-ISR were enrolled. The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR) and changes in the Rutherford category of the target limb at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included primary and secondary patency at 12 months, technical success rate, major adverse events, and ankle-brachial index (ABI). Risk factors for TLR were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard model. Results: The average follow-up time was 33 ± 8 months. The rate of technical success was 88.1% (52/59). Nine patients received bailout stenting. The rate of freedom from TLR was 84.7% (50/59) at 1 year, the Rutherford category changed at 12 months were significantly improved from baseline (p < 0.01). The primary patency rates and the secondary patency at the 12-month follow-ups were 82.5 and 92.5%, respectively. The ABI changed at 12 months were significantly improved from baseline (p < 0.01). Global limb anatomic staging system (GLASS) classification III [hazard ratio (HR) 18.44, 95% CI (1.57–215.99), p = 0.020] and postoperative Rutherford classification ≥4 [HR 8.28, 95% CI (1.85–37.06), p = 0.006] were identified as independent predictors of TLR. Conclusion: Our preliminary data suggested that MATH using a Rotarex®S catheter combined with DCB angioplasty is a safe, minimally invasive, and effective treatment for FP-ISR with favorable, immediate, and midterm outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration:http://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier [ChiCTR2000041380].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Yuan Liu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Center of Vascular Surgery, Beijing, China
| | - Wenrui Li
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Center of Vascular Surgery, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaobo Guo
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Center of Vascular Surgery, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiwen Zhang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Center of Vascular Surgery, Beijing, China
| | - Bin Liu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Center of Vascular Surgery, Beijing, China
| | - Hongzhi Yu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Center of Vascular Surgery, Beijing, China
| | - Zhe Zhang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Center of Vascular Surgery, Beijing, China
| | - Xueming Chen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Center of Vascular Surgery, Beijing, China
| | - Hai Feng
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Center of Vascular Surgery, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|