A Combined Ultrasonic Backscatter Parameter for Bone Status Evaluation in Neonates

The Protocol of Ultrasonic Backscatter Measurements of Musculoskeletal Properties

This study aims to introduce the protocol for ultrasonic backscatter measurements of musculoskeletal properties based on a novel ultrasonic backscatter bone diagnostic (UBBD) instrument. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can be adopted to measure bone mineral density (BMD) in the hip, spine, legs and the whole body. The muscle and fat mass in the legs and the whole body can be also calculated by DXA body composition analysis. Based on the proposed protocol for backscatter measurements by UBBD, ultrasonic backscatter signals can be measured in vivo, deriving three backscatter parameters [apparent integral backscatter (AIB), backscatter signal peak amplitude (BSPA) and the corresponding arrival time (BSPT)]. AIB may provide important diagnostic information about bone properties. BSPA and BSPT may be important indicators of muscle and fat properties. The standardized backscatter measurement protocol of the UBBD instrument may have the potential to evaluate musculoskeletal characteristics, providing help for promoting the application of the backscatter technique in the clinical diagnosis of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), such as osteoporosis and muscular atrophy.

Effect of transducer position on ultrasonic backscatter measurements of cancellous bone

Ultrasonic backscatter techniques are being developed to detect changes in bone caused by osteoporosis and other diseases. Backscatter measurements performed at peripheral skeletal sites such as the heel may place the interrogated region of bone tissue in the acoustic near field of the transducer. The purpose of this study is to investigate how measurements in the near field affect backscatter parameters used for ultrasonic bone assessment. Ultrasonic measurements were performed in a water tank using a planar 2.25 MHz transducer. Signals were acquired for five transducer-specimen distances: N/4, N/2, 3 N/4, N, and 5 N/4, where N is the near-field distance, a location that represents the transition from the near field to far field. Five backscatter parameters previously identified as potentially useful for ultrasonic bone assessment purposes were measured: apparent integrated backscatter, frequency slope of apparent backscatter (FSAB), frequency intercept of apparent backscatter, normalized mean of the backscatter difference, and backscatter amplitude decay constant. All five parameters depended on transducer-specimen distance to varying degrees with FSAB exhibiting the greatest dependence on distance. These results suggest that laboratory studies of bone should evaluate the performance of backscatter parameters using transducer-specimen distances that may be encountered clinically including distances where the ultrasonically interrogated region is in the near field of the transducer.

In Vivo Comparison of Backscatter Techniques for Ultrasonic Bone Assessment at the Femoral Neck

Ultrasonic techniques are being developed to detect changes in cancellous bone caused by osteoporosis. The goal of this study was to test the relative in vivo performance of eight backscatter parameters developed over the last several years for ultrasonic bone assessment: apparent integrated backscatter (AIB), frequency slope of apparent backscatter (FSAB), frequency intercept of apparent backscatter (FIAB), normalized mean of the backscatter difference (nMBD), normalized slope of the backscatter difference (nSBD), normalized intercept of the backscatter difference (nIBD), normalized backscatter amplitude ratio (nBAR) and backscatter amplitude decay constant (BADC). Backscatter measurements were performed on the left and right femoral necks of 80 adult volunteers (age = 25 ± 11 y) using an imaging system equipped with a convex array transducer. For comparison, additional ultrasonic measurements were performed at the left and right heel using a commercially available heel-bone ultrasonometer that measured the stiffness index. Six of the eight backscatter parameters (all but nSBD and nIBD) exhibited similar and highly significant (p < 0.000001) left-right correlations (0.51 ≤ R ≤ 0.68), indicating sensitivity to naturally occurring variations in bone tissue. Left-right correlations for the stiffness index measured at the heel (R = 0.75) were not significantly better than those produced by AIB, FSAB and FIAB. The short-term precisions of AIB, nMBD, nBAR and BADC (7.8%-11.7%) were comparable to that of the stiffness index measured with the heel-bone ultrasonometer (7.5%).