1
|
Eifer M, Pinian H, Klang E, Alhoubani Y, Kanana N, Tau N, Davidson T, Konen E, Catalano OA, Eshet Y, Domachevsky L. FDG PET/CT radiomics as a tool to differentiate between reactive axillary lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination and metastatic breast cancer axillary lymphadenopathy: a pilot study. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:5921-5929. [PMID: 35385985 PMCID: PMC8985565 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08725-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate if radiomics with machine learning can differentiate between F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid breast cancer metastatic lymphadenopathy and FDG-avid COVID-19 mRNA vaccine-related axillary lymphadenopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed FDG-positive, pathology-proven, metastatic axillary lymph nodes in 53 breast cancer patients who had PET/CT for follow-up or staging, and FDG-positive axillary lymph nodes in 46 patients who were vaccinated with the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. Radiomics features (110 features classified into 7 groups) were extracted from all segmented lymph nodes. Analysis was performed on PET, CT, and combined PET/CT inputs. Lymph nodes were randomly assigned to a training (n = 132) and validation cohort (n = 33) by 5-fold cross-validation. K-nearest neighbors (KNN) and random forest (RF) machine learning models were used. Performance was evaluated using an area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) score. RESULTS Axillary lymph nodes from breast cancer patients (n = 85) and COVID-19-vaccinated individuals (n = 80) were analyzed. Analysis of first-order features showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in all combined PET/CT features, most PET features, and half of the CT features. The KNN model showed the best performance score for combined PET/CT and PET input with 0.98 (± 0.03) and 0.88 (± 0.07) validation AUC, and 96% (± 4%) and 85% (± 9%) validation accuracy, respectively. The RF model showed the best result for CT input with 0.96 (± 0.04) validation AUC and 90% (± 6%) validation accuracy. CONCLUSION Radiomics features can differentiate between FDG-avid breast cancer metastatic and FDG-avid COVID-19 vaccine-related axillary lymphadenopathy. Such a model may have a role in differentiating benign nodes from malignant ones. KEY POINTS • Patients who were vaccinated with the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine have shown FDG-avid reactive axillary lymph nodes in PET-CT scans. • We evaluated if radiomics and machine learning can distinguish between FDG-avid metastatic axillary lymphadenopathy in breast cancer patients and FDG-avid reactive axillary lymph nodes. • Combined PET and CT radiomics data showed good test AUC (0.98) for distinguishing between metastatic axillary lymphadenopathy and post-COVID-19 vaccine-associated axillary lymphadenopathy. Therefore, the use of radiomics may have a role in differentiating between benign from malignant FDG-avid nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Eifer
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, 2 Sheba Road, 5266202, Ramat Gan, Israel.
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Hodaya Pinian
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, 2 Sheba Road, 5266202, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Eyal Klang
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, 2 Sheba Road, 5266202, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- ARC Center for Digital Innovation, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Yousef Alhoubani
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, 2 Sheba Road, 5266202, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Nayroz Kanana
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, 2 Sheba Road, 5266202, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Noam Tau
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, 2 Sheba Road, 5266202, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Tima Davidson
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, 2 Sheba Road, 5266202, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Eli Konen
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, 2 Sheba Road, 5266202, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Onofrio A Catalano
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yael Eshet
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, 2 Sheba Road, 5266202, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Liran Domachevsky
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, 2 Sheba Road, 5266202, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|