A Scoping Review of Pain Management Education Programs (PMEPs): Do They Prepare Nurses to Deal with Patients' Postoperative Pain?

Teaching Strategies for Nonpharmacological Pain Management to Nursing Students

BACKGROUND

Pain management is an essential concept to be integrated throughout undergraduate nursing curricula. Many studies have identified a lack of knowledge in pain assessment and management among nurses. Educators have significant roles in preparing students with pain knowledge and application of alternative nonpharmacological pain management techniques.

AIM

The purpose of this research study was to explore the impact of instruction on nonpharmacological pain management techniques in both didactic and simulated laboratory settings on nursing students' application of these techniques in clinical settings.

DESIGN

A mixed-method descriptive study, with a survey that included closed and open-ended questions.

PARTICIPANTS

The sample included 144 first-semester senior prelicensure baccalaureate nursing students.

METHOD

Investigators developed two research questionnaires. All students were given nonpharmacological pain management instruction didactically and practiced in the simulation lab and a hospital-based obstetrical practicum under faculty supervision. The students completed research questionnaires at the semester's conclusion and again prior to graduation.

RESULTS

Students reported that they implemented taught nonpharmacological pain management techniques in the clinical setting under faculty supervision. A review of the follow-up questionnaire indicates that graduating seniors did implement the nonpharmacological pain management techniques in other clinical settings and plan to utilize them in their future nursing practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Teaching nonpharmacological pain management techniques didactically, in a simulation lab and a supervised clinical setting contributes to students' ability to apply these techniques. The findings of this study have implications for nursing education and students' future clinical practice to foster their utilization of nonpharmacological pain management techniques across all settings.

Improvement in Nurses' Knowledge of Subcutaneous Catheter Use for Pain Management

BACKGROUND

Nurses often have insufficient knowledge of subcutaneous catheter use for pain management. This quality improvement project evaluated implementation of an evidence-based subcutaneous catheter nursing policy with education to improve pain management for hospitalized patients.

METHOD

A convenience sample of nurses (N = 515) completed a posttest after online training on effective subcutaneous pain management. Patient pain ratings were assessed to evaluate whether they changed after nurses' training.

RESULTS

Posttest scores showed the online learning module effectively contributed to nurses' knowledge of subcutaneous catheter pain management. A statistically significant reduction occurred in patient pain ratings (p < .001) postintervention. The number of patients experiencing moderate or severe pain decreased by 58%, for a significant reduction in pain.

CONCLUSION

An online learning module was successful in educating nurses on pain medication administration through an indwelling subcutaneous catheter. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2024;55(1):13-20.].

Is there a geographic and gender divide in Europe regarding the biopsychosocial approach to pain research? An evaluation of the 12th EFIC congress

OBJECTIVES

All pain research combined advances the different domains of the biopsychosocial model and its interactions. However, there may be discrepancies between individual countries in their biomedical, psychological or social focus to pain research. As a proxy for this possible discrepancy, we analysed the biopsychosocial orientation of presentations at a recent major international pain conference.

METHODS

The primary aim was to investigate whether there are geographical differences across Europe regarding the biopsychosocial orientation of workshop presentations at the 12th EFIC congress. The secondary aim was to investigate whether there were differences between female and male presenters regarding the biopsychosocial focus of their presentations. All available workshop abstracts were blinded and categorised by two independent reviewers as biomedical, psychosocial, biopsychosocial, or not applicable. Psychosocial and biopsychosocial were merged to non-biomedical.

RESULTS

Of the 140 available abstracts, 126 abstracts could be categorised (biomedical: 51 %; non-biomedical: 49 %). Three clusters of countries emerged: (1) countries with a clear majority (≥80 %) of non-biomedical presentations (The Netherlands and Belgium); (2) countries with a balance between biomedical and non-biomedical presentations (United Kingdom, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Finland); and (3) countries with a clear majority (71-100 %) of biomedical presentations (Italy, Germany, Switzerland and France). Overall, women delivered more presentations than men (70 vs. 56 presentations), and delivered proportionally more non-biomedical presentations (57 %) whereas men delivered proportionally more biomedical presentations (61 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of the 12th EFIC congress revealed geographical and gender differences in biopsychosocial orientation. Whether this reflects established differences in pain research requires further investigation.

Surgical Nurses' Perceptions of Strategies to Enhance Pain Management Proficiency: A Qualitative Study

To describe surgical nurses' strategies for enhancing their pain management proficiency. A qualitative design was used to conduct the study. The participants were forty surgical nurses who had at least six years of nursing experience in caring for patients with pain. They responded to open-ended questions based on a review of the policy documents concerning the main elements of the pain management programme to be implemented by surgical nurses. Three key themes emerged from the surgical nurses' suggested strategies: partnering, disrupting, and becoming familiar with pain management competency concerns. Surgical nurses' strategies in acute and chronic pain management nursing units included solving patients' problems and promoting and enhancing pain strategies to address health challenges in organisations. The themes presented in the results include enhancing pain management in nursing competencies. State-of-the-art healthcare technologies are being applied to pain management. Surgical nurses' strategies should improve the quality of nursing care, especially post-surgery recovery time. It is recommended to engage patients, their families, and multidisciplinary care teams in other healthcare fields.

Core components of an effective pain management education programme for surgical nurses: A Delphi study*

The critical reason for this study is the inadequate training received by surgical nurses in acute and chronic pain management nursing services for patients.

Validation and Scoring of the Greek Version of the Strategic and Clinical Quality Indicators in Postoperative Pain Management (SCQIPP) Questionnaire

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to validate the Greek version of the Strategic and Clinical Quality Indicators in Postoperative Pain Management (SCQIPP) questionnaire.

DESIGN

The study was designed as a prospective questionnaire survey.

METHODS

Overall, 210 elective surgical patients were included . SCQIPP consisted of 14 items that were scored on a five point scale. After the translation and linguistic adjustments, the tool was distributed to the surgical wards. Internal consistency reliability was assessed by Cronbach's alpha. The tool construct was generated by a principal axis factoring model with promax rotation.

FINDINGS

Base Cronbach's alpha was 0.814. Due to low inter-item and item-total correlations and the increase of Cronbach's alpha (0.834) when item two was deleted, 13 items were included in the current tool version. Factor analysis identified three district subscales: nursing care, pain management, and support. Subscale and convergent validity were confirmed. The mean score of the validated tool was 55.2 (Range: 44-63). A low level of care was highlighted in most items.

CONCLUSIONS

The Greek version of the SCQIPP questionnaire is a valid and efficient tool for the evaluation of the quality of care of postoperative pain management.