Prevalence of Bacterial Contamination of Casting Material in a Pediatric Population

Cleaning and Durability of Upper Extremity Orthotics: A Patient's Perspective

Introduction We aimed to evaluate orthotic hygiene, preference for immobilization material, and frequency of unplanned orthotic adjustments and replacements. Methods All patients with fiberglass casts, thermoplastic splints, or prefabricated braces who presented at a large private academic institution between January 2020 and July 2023 were provided an 11-item survey assessing the length of immobilization, frequency of orthotic changes, orthotic hygiene, preference of immobilization, and whether patients recall instructions regarding orthotic care. Results A total of 385 surveys were collected, consisting of 96 (24.9%) casts, 202 (52.5%) thermoplastic splints, and 87 (22.6%) prefabricated braces. Patients were most frequently immobilized for two to six weeks. Of those, 106 (27.5%) patients required an unplanned adjustment or replacement. Almost half (182 patients, 47.3%) attempted to clean their orthotics, which was significantly greater among thermoplastic splints. A total of 229 (59.5%) respondents reported either not receiving or were unsure if they received instruction on proper orthotic hygiene. Conclusion Orthotic care and hygiene instructions are often overlooked or not retained by patients. Nearly one-third of patients required an unplanned adjustment or replacement, which was most frequent with thermoplastic orthotics.

Neuromuscular Patients Are 40% More Likely to Get a Cast Injury

BACKGROUND

Cast injuries can occur during application, throughout immobilization, and during removal, with common morbidities being pressure ulcers and cast saw burns. The incidence rate of cast injuries in generalized and diagnosis specific pediatric populations is not known. The goal of this study is to accurately quantify the rate of incidence of cast injuries at a large pediatric orthopaedic practice and identify potentially modifiable risk factors to guide quality of care improvement.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed at our institution between July 2019 and October 2020. Inclusion criteria was all pediatric patients (below 21 y old) with an orthopaedic diagnosis that was treated with casting. The child's diagnosis, specific type of cast, and training level of the person applying the cast was recorded. Patient injuries were identified through cast technicians' documentation regarding cast removal. The primary outcome was the incidence of casting injuries from July 2019 through October 2020. Additional outcomes included the association between diagnosis of neuromuscular disease and training level of individual applying the cast with casting injuries. χ2 tests were used to compare categorical variables and post hoc comparisons using Bonferroni correction. Injury incidence rates were calculated as number of injuries per 1000 casts.

RESULTS

There were 2239 casts placed on children at this institution between July 2019 and October 2020 and a total of 28 injuries for an incidence rate of 12.5 per 1000. Of the 28 total injuries reported, there were 5 cast saw burns (2.2 per 1000) and 23 pressure ulcers (10.3 per 1000). Incidence of cast injury was not significantly correlated with timing of application during the academic year or training level of the individual applying the cast (P=0.21 and 0.86). Notably, there was a significantly higher incidence of cast injuries in individuals with a diagnosis of a neuromuscular disorder (37.4 per 1000) than those without (7.5 per 1000) (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of cast injuries is 12.5 per 1000 children at our level I trauma tertiary referral pediatric clinic. Training level of the individual applying the cast or timing during the academic year did not correlate with cast injuries. Patients with neuromuscular disorders are at significantly higher risk for experiencing cast injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Surface Engineering Strategies to Enhance the In Situ Performance of Medical Devices Including Atomic Scale Engineering

Decades of intense scientific research investigations clearly suggest that only a subset of a large number of metals, ceramics, polymers, composites, and nanomaterials are suitable as biomaterials for a growing number of biomedical devices and biomedical uses. However, biomaterials are prone to microbial infection due to Escherichia coli (E. coli), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis), hepatitis, tuberculosis, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and many more. Hence, a range of surface engineering strategies are devised in order to achieve desired biocompatibility and antimicrobial performance in situ. Surface engineering strategies are a group of techniques that alter or modify the surface properties of the material in order to obtain a product with desired functionalities. There are two categories of surface engineering methods: conventional surface engineering methods (such as coating, bioactive coating, plasma spray coating, hydrothermal, lithography, shot peening, and electrophoretic deposition) and emerging surface engineering methods (laser treatment, robot laser treatment, electrospinning, electrospray, additive manufacturing, and radio frequency magnetron sputtering technique). Atomic-scale engineering, such as chemical vapor deposition, atomic layer etching, plasma immersion ion deposition, and atomic layer deposition, is a subsection of emerging technology that has demonstrated improved control and flexibility at finer length scales than compared to the conventional methods. With the advancements in technologies and the demand for even better control of biomaterial surfaces, research efforts in recent years are aimed at the atomic scale and molecular scale while incorporating functional agents in order to elicit optimal in situ performance. The functional agents include synthetic materials (monolithic ZnO, quaternary ammonium salts, silver nano-clusters, titanium dioxide, and graphene) and natural materials (chitosan, totarol, botanical extracts, and nisin). This review highlights the various strategies of surface engineering of biomaterial including their functional mechanism, applications, and shortcomings. Additionally, this review article emphasizes atomic scale engineering of biomaterials for fabricating antimicrobial biomaterials and explores their challenges.