Evaluation of a Novel Quality of Life Scale for Schoolchildren with Nonstrabismic Binocular Vision Anomalies

Diagnostic Protocol for Accommodative and Vergence Anomalies - A Review

PURPOSE

To review the diagnostic protocols of non-strabismic binocular vision anomalies.

METHODS

We carried out a literature search on published articles of non-strabismic accommodative and vergence anomalies in different international optometry and ophthalmology journals found in the Pubmed, ResearchGate, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE databases.

RESULTS

The diagnostic criteria and normative data from the nine articles selected show discrepancies and variability in methodologies and techniques in the overall assessment of Non-Strabismic Binocular Vision Anomalies (NSBVA). Near point of convergence measurement is the most common assessment, whereas the vergence facility is the least commonly used assessment in terms of evaluating convergence insufficiency. Near point of convergence > 10 cm alone is the most sensitive sign to detect convergence insufficiency in a community set-up but high positive relative accommodation (>3.50D) is the most sensitive sign to diagnose accommodative excess. On the other hand, monocular accommodative facility < 7 CPM has the highest sensitivity to confirm the diagnosis of accommodative infacility. This review also indicates that the more clinical signs that are included in a set of diagnostic criteria, the lower the prevalence rate for that diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no standardized and diagnostically validated protocol for the assessment of NSBVAs. Variable cutoff values obtained using different methods and the selection of diagnostic criteria by various researchers have led to discrepancies that highlight the need for diagnostic validity of available protocols (combination of tests) for each anomaly. Clinical signs such as positive relative accommodation (PRA) for accommodative excess, near point of convergence (NPC) for convergence insufficiency and monocular accommodative facility (MAF) for accommodative infacility were found to be useful diagnostic signs of these anomalies. Studies should be carried out for accommodative and vergence dysfunctions using proper designs and methods to validate diagnostic criteria for all age groups. Standardization of assessment protocol and cutoff criteria will also aid in calculating prevalence for non-strabismic binocular vision anomalies.

Influence of feedforward control-based health education intervention on compliance, visual function and self-perceived burden among patients with diabetic retinopathy

Objective

To assess the influence of feedforward control-based health education intervention on the compliance, visual function and self-perceived burden (SPB) among patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR).

Methods

Eighty-six DR patients were divided into feedforward control and control groups (n=43). The control group was given routine nursing intervention, based on which the feedforward control group received feedforward control-based health education intervention. The health behavior indices were compared after intervention. The correlations of QOL score with SPB score and health behavior indices were analysed using Pearson's and Spearman's coefficients.

Results

After intervention, the total QOL score and scores of symptoms and visual function, physical function, social activity, and mentality and psychology were significantly improved compared with those before intervention, which were significantly higher in the feedforward control group (P<0.05). SPB score was significantly lower in the two groups after intervention than that before intervention, particularly in the feedforward control group (P<0.05). The QOL score of DR patients was significantly negatively correlated with SPB score but positively correlated with health behavior indices (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The feedforward control-based health education intervention mode is beneficial for guiding DR patients to promote visual function recovery and to reduce SPB.

Validation of the Symptom Questionnaire for Visual Dysfunctions (SQVD): A Questionnaire to Evaluate Symptoms of any Type of Visual Dysfunctions

Purpose

To assess psychometric properties of the Symptom Questionnaire for Visual Dysfunctions (SQVD) questionnaire, including accuracy, validity, and reliability, in a clinical sample of patients having any type of visual dysfunction.

Methods

A clinical sample of 306 patients self-administered the SQVD. Rasch analysis was performed to analyze the functionality of the response categories, fit statistics, differential item functioning (DIF), person and item reliability, targeting, local dependency, unidimensionality, and transformation table. Accuracy was assessed by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, using symptoms reported in each patient's clinical record as the gold standard for classifying patients with and without symptoms. The concurrent validity, known group validity, and test–retest reliability (repeatability, using the intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) were also examined.

Results

SQVD showed orderly category responses. The 14 items fit the Rasch model without significant DIF for gender, presbyopia, and dysfunctions. Person and item reliabilities were 0.81 and 0.85, respectively. Targeting was –1.49 logits. Yen's Q3 statistic showed no local dependency. SQVD was unidimensional (first contrast of the residual = 1.852 eigenvalue with a variance explained by measures of 52.23%). The area under the ROC curve was 0.836 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.792–0.879) with a cutoff of ≥6 showing good accuracy (sensitivity = 0.759; specificity = 0.783). SQVD showed good concurrent and known group validity and high repeatability (ICC, 0.857; 95% CI, 0.710–0.933) when administered twice 1 week apart.

Conclusions

SQVD has shown good psychometric properties. It can be considered an accurate, valid, and reliable questionnaire to detect visual symptoms related to any type of refractive, accommodative, and binocular dysfunction.

Translational Relevance

SQVD may be used for diagnostic purposes, as it can accurately detect symptoms related to any sort of visual dysfunction. It may also be useful to monitor the treatment outcomes of these conditions.