Zhang D, Zou W, Zhang B, Guo P. Scalp acupuncture for post-stroke spastic hemiparesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Medicine (Baltimore) 2024;
103:e37167. [PMID:
38428878 PMCID:
PMC10906645 DOI:
10.1097/md.0000000000037167]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Spastic paralysis is one of the most common sequelae of stroke, severely affecting patients' limb function and reducing their quality of life. Scalp acupuncture (SA) has been shown to significantly improve cerebral blood supply and reduce the severity of limb spasticity. This meta-analysis aims to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of SA in the treatment of post-stroke spastic paralysis, providing evidence-based medicine for clinical management of this condition.
METHODS
We comprehensively searched databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, VIP Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database, China Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy of SA in post-stroke spastic paralysis were identified until July 28, 2023. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 and Stata17.0.
RESULTS
A total of 16 studies were included. Meta-analysis showed that the modified Ashworth spasticity assessment scale in the SA group was significantly higher than that in the rehabilitation group (mean difference [MD] = -0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-0.75, -0.37], Z = 5.67, P < .00001). The simplified Fugl-Meyer motor function assessment scale in the SA group was significantly higher than that in the rehabilitation group (MD = 5.86, 95% CI [3.26, 8.46], Z = 4.41, P < .0001). The modified Barthel index assessment scale in the SA group was significantly higher than that in the rehabilitation group (MD = 5.79, 95% CI [4.73, 6.84], Z = 10.77, P < .00001). Additionally, the clinical effective rate in the SA group was significantly higher than that in the rehabilitation group (relative risk = 1.25, 95% CI [1.16, 1.36], Z = 5.42, P < .00001).
CONCLUSION
SA combined with rehabilitation therapy has certain advantages in reducing limb spasticity, improving limb function, and enhancing activities of daily living in patients with post-stroke spastic paralysis. This study provides reference and theoretical support for the promotion of SA in the treatment of this condition.
Collapse