Hypomania, Depression, Euthymia: New Evidence in Parkinson's Disease

Screening for impulse control disorders in Parkinson's disease and dopamine agonist use: a study of pharmacokinetic and psychological risk factors

INTRODUCTION

Dopamine agonist (DA) use is considered the main risk factor for impulse control disorder (ICD) development in Parkinson's disease (PD). Besides DAs, personality traits and cognitive features may represent risk factors for ICDs. The primary aim of this study was to investigate differences in DA plasma concentrations in PD patients with and without a positive screening for ICDs according to validated tools. The secondary aim was to compare the psychological profile between ICD positive and negative screened patients.

METHODS

PD patients receiving chronic DA therapy were screened for ICDs according to the Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease (QUIP). Blood samples for measurement of DA (pramipexole, ropinirole, rotigotine) trough plasma concentrations were drawn in the morning, at mean 16-19 h from the last DA dose. Patients' psychological profile was investigated by Millon Clinical Multiaxal Inventory III and Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11).

RESULTS

One hundred and five PD patients were enrolled. Forty-one patients (39%) were QUIP positive, mainly for binge eating and hobbyism. Median plasma concentrations of pramipexole (n = 71, 66%), ropinirole (n = 21, 19%), and rotigotine (n = 16, 15%) were similar between QUIP positive and negative patients. QUIP positive patients showed higher motor impulsiveness (p = 0.04) and tended to higher total impulsiveness (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This is the first prospective study to evaluate the relationship between DA plasma concentrations and ICDs risk in PD patients. DA plasma levels were overlapping between QUIP positive and negative patients. BIS-11, particularly the motor impulsiveness subscale, might be a useful screening tool in PD patients eligible for DA therapy.

Depression After Parkinson's Disease: Treated Differently or Not At All?

Depression is a common, potentially debilitating non-motor symptom of Parkinson's disease which may manifest at any time and can respond to treatment. Although depression is a known primary mediator of health-related quality of life, it is currently unknown whether the timing of depression diagnosis relative to PD diagnosis affects receipt of depression treatment. Electronic health record data were examined to explore differences in depression treatment among patients diagnosed with depression before or after PD diagnosis. Compared to PD patients diagnosed with depression prior to PD, those diagnosed with depression following PD are less likely to receive any treatment, either pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic, indicating a temporal association between the time of PD diagnosis and receipt of depression treatment. This highlights a potentially substantial treatment gap, despite the existence of efficacious treatment. Diagnosis with PD appears to alter depression treatment and further research is warranted to determine potential causes and effective interventions.

Psychiatric Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease Patients before and One Year after Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy: Role of Lead Positioning and Not of Total Electrical Energy Delivered

Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients may experience neuropsychiatric symptoms, including depression, anxiety, sleep disturbances, psychosis, as well as behavioral and cognitive symptoms during all the different stages of the illness. Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) therapy has proven to be successful in controlling the motor symptoms of PD and its possible correlation with the occurrence or worsening of neuropsychiatric symptoms has been reported. We aimed to assess the neuropsychiatric symptoms of 14 PD patients before and after one year of Subthalamic Nucleus (STN)-DBS and to correlate the possible changes to the lead placement and to the total electrical energy delivered. We assessed PD motor symptoms, depression, anxiety, apathy, impulsivity, and suicidality using clinician- and/or self-administered rating scales and correlated the results to the lead position using the Medtronic SuretuneTM software and to the total electrical energy delivered (TEED). At the 12-month follow-up, the patients showed a significant improvement in PD symptoms on the UPDRS (Unified Parkinson’s disease Rating Scale) (−38.5%; p < 0.001) and in anxiety on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) (−29%; p = 0.041), with the most significant reduction in the physiological anxiety subscore (−36.26%; p < 0.001). A mild worsening of impulsivity was detected on the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) (+9%; p = 0.048), with the greatest increase in the attentional impulsiveness subscore (+13.60%; p = 0.050). No statistically significant differences were found for the other scales. No correlation was found between TEED and scales’ scores, while the positioning of the stimulating electrodes in the different portions of the STN was shown to considerably influence the outcome, with more anterior and/or medial lead position negatively influencing psychiatric symptoms.

Depression in Patients with Parkinson's Disease: Current Understanding of its Neurobiology and Implications for Treatment

Depression is one of the most frequent and burdensome non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease (PD), across all stages. Even when its severity is mild, PD depression has a great impact on quality of life for these patients and their caregivers. Accordingly, accurate diagnosis, supported by validated scales, identification of risk factors, and recognition of motor and non-motor symptoms comorbid to depression are critical to understanding the neurobiology of depression, which in turn determines the effectiveness of dopaminergic drugs, antidepressants and non-pharmacological interventions. Recent advances using in vivo functional and structural imaging demonstrate that PD depression is underpinned by dysfunction of limbic networks and monoaminergic systems, depending on the stage of PD and its associated symptoms, including apathy, anxiety, rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD), cognitive impairment and dementia. In particular, the evolution of serotonergic, noradrenergic, and dopaminergic dysfunction and abnormalities of limbic circuits across time, involving the anterior cingulate and orbitofrontal cortices, amygdala, thalamus and ventral striatum, help to delineate the variable expression of depression in patients with prodromal, early and advanced PD. Evidence is accumulating to support the use of dual serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (desipramine, nortriptyline, venlafaxine) in patients with PD and moderate to severe depression, while selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive behavioral therapy may also be considered. In all patients, recent findings advocate that optimization of dopamine replacement therapy and evaluation of deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus to improve motor symptoms represents an important first step, in addition to physical activity. Overall, this review indicates that increasing understanding of neurobiological changes help to implement a roadmap of tailored interventions for patients with PD and depression, depending on the stage and comorbid symptoms underlying PD subtypes and their prognosis.

Preexisting Bipolar Disorder Influences the Subsequent Phenotype of Parkinson's Disease

Background

Patients with bipolar spectrum disorders (BSDs) exhibit an increased risk of Parkinson's disease (PD).

Objective

The aim is to investigate whether a previous diagnosis of BSDs influences the phenotype of PD.

Methods

Of 2660 PD patients followed for at least 6 years (6–27), 250 (BSD‐PD) had BSDs, 6–20 years before PD diagnosis; 48%–43% had a PD or BSD family history, and 34 carried glucocerebrosidase (GBA) and Parkin (PRKN) mutations. The cohort was split into a subset of 213 BSD‐PD patients, compared with 426 matched PD patients without BSDs, and a subset of 34 BSD‐PD and 79 PD patients carrying GBA or PRKN mutations. Carriers of mutations absent in BSD‐PD patients and of synuclein triplication were excluded. Structured clinical interviews and mood disorder questionnaires assessed BSDs. Linear mixed models evaluated the assessment scales over time. Thirteen BSD‐PD patients underwent subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN‐DBS) and were compared with 27 matched STN‐DBS‐treated PD patients.

Results

Compared to PD patients, BSD‐PD showed (1) higher frequency of family history of PD (odds ratio [OR] 3.31; 2.32–4.71) and BSDs (OR 6.20; 4.11–9.35) 5); (2) higher incidence of impulse control disorders (hazard ratio [HR] 5.95, 3.89–9.09); (3) higher frequency of functional disorders occurring before PD therapy (HR, 5.67, 3.95–8.15); (4) earlier occurrence of delusions or mild dementia (HR, 7.70, 5.55–10.69; HR, 1.43, 1.16–1.75); and (5) earlier mortality (1.48; 1.11–1.97). Genetic BSD‐PD subjects exhibited clinical features indistinguishable from nongenetic BSD‐PD subjects. STN‐DBS‐treated BSD‐PD patients showed no improvements in quality of life compared to the control group.

Conclusions

BSDs as a prodrome to PD unfavorably shape their course and are associated with detrimental neuropsychiatric features and treatment outcomes. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society