Identification of 6 Hub Proteins and Protein Risk Signature of Colorectal Cancer

The RNA interactome in the Hallmarks of Cancer

Ribonucleic acid (RNA) molecules are indispensable for cellular homeostasis in healthy and malignant cells. However, the functions of RNA extend well beyond that of a protein-coding template. Rather, both coding and non-coding RNA molecules function through critical interactions with a plethora of cellular molecules, including other RNAs, DNA, and proteins. Deconvoluting this RNA interactome, including the interacting partners, the nature of the interaction, and dynamic changes of these interactions in malignancies has yielded fundamental advances in knowledge and are emerging as a novel therapeutic strategy in cancer. Here, we present an RNA-centric review of recent advances in the field of RNA-RNA, RNA-protein, and RNA-DNA interactomic network analysis and their impact across the Hallmarks of Cancer. This article is categorized under: RNA in Disease and Development > RNA in Disease RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > RNA-Protein Complexes.

Construction and Validation of a Protein-associated Prognostic Model for Gastrointestinal Cancer

Background Gastrointestinal cancer (GIC) is a prevalent and lethal malignant tumor. It is obligatory to investigate innovative biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis. Proteins play a crucial role in regulating the occurrence and progression of GIC. However, the prognostic value of proteins is unclear in GIC.

OBJECTIVE

This paper aims to identify the hub prognosis-related proteins (PAPs) and construct a prognosis model for GIC patients for clinical application.

METHODS

Protein expression data of GIC was obtained from The Cancer Proteome Atlas (TCPA) and downloaded the clinicopathological data from The Cancer Genome Atlas database (TCGA). Besides, hub proteins were filtrated via univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Moreover, survival analysis and nomogram were used to predict overall survival (OS). We used the calibration curves to assess the consistency of predictive and actual survival rates. The consistency index (C-index) was used to evaluate the prognostic ability of the predictive model. Furthermore, functional enrichment analysis and protein co-expression of PAPs were used to explore their roles in GIC.

RESULTS

Finally, a prognosis model was conducted based on ten PAPs (CYCLIND1, DVL3, NCADHERIN, SYK, ANNEXIN VII, CD20, CMET, RB, TFRC, and PREX1). The risk score calculated by the model was an independent prognostic predictor. Compared with the high-risk subgroup, the low-risk subgroup had better OS. In the TCGA cohort, the area under the curve value of the receiver operating characteristic curve of the prognostic model was 0.692. The expression of proteins and risk score had a significant association with the clinicopathological characteristics of GIC. Besides, a nomogram based on GIC clinicopathological features and risk scores could properly predict the OS of individual GIC patients. The C-index is 0.71 in the TCGA cohort and 0.73 in the GEO cohort.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that the risk score is an independent prognostic biomarker and is related to the malignant clinical features of GIC patients. Besides, several PAPs associated with the survival and clinicopathological characteristics of GIC might be potential biomarkers for GIC diagnosis and treatment.

Identification of a Novel Protein-Based Signature to Improve Prognosis Prediction in Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma

Background

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is one of the most common types of malignant adult kidney cancer, and its incidence and mortality are not optimistic. It is well known that tumor-related protein markers play an important role in cancer detection, prognosis prediction, or treatment selection, such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), so a comprehensive analysis was performed in this study to explore the prognostic value of protein expression in patients with ccRCC.

Materials and Methods

Protein expression data were obtained from The Cancer Proteome Atlas (TCPA), and clinical information were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We selected 445 patients with complete information and then separated them into a training set and testing set. We performed univariate, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox analyses to find prognosis-related proteins (PRPs) and constructed a protein signature. Then, we used stratified analysis to fully verify the prognostic significance of the prognostic-related protein signature score (PRPscore). Besides, we also explored the differences in immunotherapy response and immune cell infiltration level in high and low score groups. The consensus clustering analysis was also performed to identify potential cancer subgroups.

Results

From the training set, a total of 233 PRPs were selected, and a seven-protein signature was constructed, including ACC1, AR, MAPK, PDK1, PEA15, SYK, and BRAF. Based on the PRPscore, patients could be divided into two groups with significantly different overall survival rates. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses proved that this signature was an independent prognostic factor for patients (P < 0.001). Moreover, the signature showed a high ability to distinguish prognostic outcomes among subgroups, and the low score group had a better prognosis (P < 0.001) and better immunotherapy response (P = 0.003) than the high score group.

Conclusion

We constructed a novel protein signature with robust predictive power and high clinical value. This will help to guide the disease management and individualized treatment of ccRCC patients.