Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Albumin-to-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio in Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

The association between serum albumin and alkaline phosphatase in cancer patients

The role of serum albumin (ALB) has been extensively studied in patients with cancer; however, research on its effect on bone metastasis in these patients remains limited. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between serum ALB and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels in patients with tumors. Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011 to 2018, we assessed the correlation between serum ALB and ALP levels using a weighted multivariate linear regression model, whereas a weighted generalized additive model and smooth curve fitting were used to address potential nonlinearities. A total of 1876 patients with cancer were included in our study. In the subgroup analysis stratified by sex, race/ethnicity, and liver disease, the negative correlation of ALB with ALP remained for most groups, except in blacks (β = -1.755, 95%CI: [-3.848, 0.338], P = .103) and patients with gout (β = -0.676, 95%CI: [-2.061, 0.709], P = .340). In black people and patients with gout, the relationship between ALB and ALP showed an inverted U-shaped curve, with an inflection point at approximately 42 g/dL. Our study showed an inverse correlation between ALB and ALP levels in most patients with tumors, but not in black patients and those with gout. The measurement of ALB levels can serve as a screening tool for bone metastases while guiding therapeutic intervention strategies.

Clinical role of pretreatment albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio in lung cancer: a meta-analysis

The association between pretreatment albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) and clinicopathological parameters and prognosis in lung cancer is unclear. The study aimed to identify the clinical role of pretreatment AAPR among lung cancer patients. Several databases were searched for relevant studies. The primary outcome and secondary outcome were long-term survival including the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and clinicopathological characteristics, respectively. The hazard ratios (HRs) and relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined. A total of 11 publications involving 10,589 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results manifested that a lower pretreatment AAPR predicted poorer OS (HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.59-0.71, P < 0.001) and PFS (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.59-0.78, P < 0.001). Furthermore, subgroup analysis for the OS and PFS based on the pathological type and treatment showed similar results and pretreatment AAPR was significantly associated with worse prognosis. Besides, pretreatment AAPR was significantly associated with male (RR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.13, P < 0.001), poor differentiation (RR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.03-1.73, P = 0.029), advanced T stage (RR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.03-1.52, P = 0.026), N stage (RR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.15-1.55, P < 0.001) and TNM stage (RR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.223, P < 0.001). Therefore, pretreatment AAPR is significantly related to prognosis and tumor stage in lung cancer and patients with a lower pretreatment AAPR are more likely to experience poor survival and advanced tumor stage.

Additional diagnostic value of the monocyte to red blood cell count ratio and the product of lymphocyte count and albumin concentration in lung cancer management

The present study aimed to evaluate the potential of the monocyte to red blood cell count ratio (MRR), the neutrophil to red blood cell count ratio (NRR), the lymphocyte to red blood cell count ratio (LRR) and the product of lymphocyte count and albumin concentration (LA) for the diagnosis of lung cancer. The cases of 216 patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer and 184 healthy volunteers were retrospectively analysed. The MRR and NRR were found to be higher in patients with lung cancer compared with those in healthy controls, while the LRR and LA were lower. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that of the four markers, the MRR and LA yielded a higher area under the curve (AUC) (MRR: AUC, 0.810; 95% CI, 0.768-0.847; and LA: AUC, 0.721; 95% CI, 0.674-0.764). The combination of MRR, LA, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1 (CYFRA21-1) achieved the highest diagnostic value when compared with other single or combined markers (AUC, 0.882; 95% CI, 0.846-0.912; sensitivity, 81.9%; specificity, 81.0%). As the disease progressed, the MRR tended to increase, while LA exhibited a decreasing trend. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed an increase in the MRR, as well as in CEA and CYFRA21-1 concentrations, and a decrease in the LA, which could all be possible risk factors for lung cancer. Differences in the MRR and LA between patients with early stage (IA-IIIA) lung cancer and healthy controls were observed. Further analysis revealed that the MRR also exhibited the potential to detect early stage (IA-IIIA) lung cancer in the model. The present findings demonstrated that the MRR and LA may be used as auxiliary biomarkers for the diagnosis of lung cancer and could partly indicate disease progression.

Evaluation of the Prognostic Capacity of a Novel Survival Marker in Patients with Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) is a malignant tumor associated with poor survival, and easily obtainable prognostic markers are of high interest. Therefore, we aimed to assess the prognostic value of a novel survival index (SI) combining prognostic values of clinical (T and N classifications and invasion across Ohngren’s line), inflammatory (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio), and nutritional (albumin and body-mass index) markers. All patients with primarily treated SNSCC between 2002 and 2020 (n = 51) were included. Each of the six SI components was stratified into a low- (0) and high-risk (1) categories. Subsequently, the cohort was stratified into low- (SI of 0–2) and high-risk SI groups (SI of 3–6). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between patients with low- and high-risk SI. The log-rank test was used to test for statistical significance. Overall, the mortality rate was 41.2% (n = 21), and the recurrence rate was 43.1% (n = 22). We observed significantly better OS in patients with low-risk SI (n = 24/51, 47.1%, mean OS: 7.9 years, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.3–9.6 years) than in high-risk SI (n = 27/51, 52.9%, mean OS: 3.4 years, 95% CI: 2.2–4.5 years; p = 0.013). Moreover, we also showed that patients with low-risk SI had a longer DFS than patients with high-risk SI (mean DFS: 6.4, 95% CI: 4.8–8.0 vs. mean DFS: 2.4 years, 95% CI 1.3–3.5, p = 0.012). The SI combines the prognostic capacity of well-established clinical, radiologic, inflammatory, and nutritional prognosticators and showed prognostic potential in our cohort of SNSCC patients.

The prognostic value of fibrinogen to albumin ratio in malignant tumor patients: A meta-analysis

Background

Recent studies have shown that the fibrinogen to albumin ratio (FAR) is closely related to the prognosis of various cancers. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the prognostic value of FAR in malignancies based on the available evidence.

Method

To systematically search the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Google Scholar, Baidu scholars, CNKI and VIP databases for relevant studies published before April 1, 2022, and to evaluate the fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR) and survival of patients with malignant tumors through a meta-analysis relationship between the results. Results. This meta-analysis included 19 eligible studies involving 5926 cancer patients. We found that high FAR was associated with poor overall survival (HR=2.25, 95%CI 1.86-2.74, p&lt;0.001), recurrence-free survival (HR=2.29, 95%CI 1.91-2.76, P&lt;0.001), progression-free survival (HR: 2.10, 95%CI 1.58-2.79, p&lt;0.001), disease-free survival (HR=1.52, 95%CI 1.17-1.96, p=0.001), and time to recurrence (HR: 1.555, 95%CI 1.031-2.346, P=0.035) was significantly correlated.

Conclusions

High FAR is significantly associated with poor clinical outcomes in cancer, suggesting that it may be an important predictor of prognosis in patients with malignancies.

Pretreatment serum albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio is an independent prognosticator of survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have suggested that a low albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) is associated with a lower survival rate in patients with various malignancies. However, the relationship between pretreatment AAPR and the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer (GC) remains unclear.

AIM

To investigate the prognostic value of AAPR in distant metastatic GC.

METHODS

A total of 191 patients with distant metastatic cancer from a single institute were enrolled in this study. Pretreatment clinical data, including serum albumin and alkaline phosphatase levels, were collected. A chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was applied to evaluate the correlations between AAPR and various clinical parameters in GC patients. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression model were used to evaluate the prognostic efficacy of AAPR in metastatic GC patients. A two-sided P value lower than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that 0.48 was the optimal threshold value for AAPR. AAPR ≤ 0.48 was significantly associated with bone (P < 0.05) and liver metastasis (P < 0.05). Patients with high levels of AAPR had better survival in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), regardless of the presence of liver/bone metastasis. Pretreatment AAPR was found to be a favorable predictor of OS and PFS based on a multivariate cox regression model. AAPR-M system, constructed based on AAPR and number of metastatic sites, showed superior predictive ability relative to the number of metastatic sites for predicting survival.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment AAPR may serve as an independent prognostic factor for predicting PFS and OS in patients with metastatic GC. Furthermore, AAPR may assist clinicians with individualizing treatment.

Nomograms based on lactate dehydrogenase to albumin ratio for predicting survival in colorectal cancer

Purpose: We aimed to determine if lactate dehydrogenase to albumin ratio (LAR) might play a prognostic role for patients with operable colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients and Methods: 1334 operable CRC patients in Wuhan Union Hospital Between July 2013 and September 2017 were enrolled in this study and were randomly appointed them into training (n=954) and validation (n=380) sets. The relationship between LAR and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were determined by restricted cubic splines (RCS) with Cox regression models. LAR was then divided into three categories based on the RCS and compared to the well-known TNM stage system. Finally, survival nomograms were developed by compounding the LAR and other clinical factors. Results: Baseline LAR values and the all-cause mortality were U shaped, which slowly decreased until around 4.50 and then started to increase rapidly when the LAR ranged from 4.50-6.68 and then became flat thereafter (P for non-linearity <0.001). LAR was superior to TNM stage for OS as well as DFS and LAR plus TNM stage could add more net benefit than clinical model alone. Moreover, the survival nomograms based on LAR achieved great predictive ability for OS and DFS in operable CRC patients. Conclusions: LAR could be served as a reliable prognostic factor for OS as well as DFS, with more accurate prognostic prediction than current TNM stage for patients with operable CRC.

Albumin-to-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio as a Novel Prognostic Marker of Nivolumab Monotherapy for Previously Treated Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIM

The relationship between albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) and the outcome of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors remains unresolved. We aimed to clarify the prognostic role of AAPR in nivolumab monotherapy for previously treated mRCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 60 patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab after failure of at least one molecular targeted therapy. The patients were stratified into two groups based on the baseline AAPR. The threshold of AAPR was determined using receiver-operating characteristics and Youden index analyses. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) of nivolumab therapy were compared between the high and low AAPR groups.

RESULTS

The threshold of AAPR was set at 0.3, and 20 patients (33%) were assigned to the low AAPR group. The median OS and PFS were significantly lower in the low AAPR group than those in the high group (OS: 8.3 months vs. not reached, p<0.0001; PFS: 2.9 vs. 10.4 months, p=0.0006). Moreover, ORR was significantly lower in the low AAPR group than in the high group (16% vs. 45%, p=0.0397). Multivariate analyses further showed that AAPR was an independent factor for OS [HR=0.27 (95% CI=0.09-0.77), p=0.0151] but not for PFS (p=0.174).

CONCLUSION

Baseline AAPR was significantly associated with outcome in patients with mRCC receiving nivolumab monotherapy and may, therefore, constitute an effective prognostic factor for nivolumab treatment.

Association between pre-diagnostic serum albumin and cancer risk: Results from a prospective population-based study

Background

Albumin is supposed to be associated with cancer risk. However, evidence on serum albumin and cancer risk among the Chinese population is sparse. This study was conducted to evaluate the association between pre‐diagnostic serum albumin and cancer risk among Chinese.

Methods

A total of 82,061 participants with baseline information on serum albumin concentration in the Kailuan cohort were recruited. Cox proportional hazards models and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were used to evaluate the association between pre‐diagnostic serum albumin and cancer risk.

Results

Albumin levels were inversely associated with overall cancer risk (HR [95% CI]: Q2, Q3, Q4 vs. Q1: 0.91 [0.78–1.07], 0.80 [0.70–0.92], 0.73 [0.63–0.85]), and the risk of lung, colorectal, and liver cancer (HR [95% CI]: Q4 vs. Q1: lung: 0.70 [0.52–0.95], colorectal: 0.43 [0.26–0.72], liver: 0.59 [0.36–0.95]). After excluding new cancer cases within 2 years since enrollment, a more significant association was observed for liver cancer (HR [95% CI]: Q4 vs. Q1: 0.41 [0.21–0.78]), while associations converted to nonsignificant for lung and colorectal cancer. The RCS model suggested an inverse linear association between albumin and the risk of overall cancer (p‐overall < 0.0001, p‐nonlinear = 0.3716) and liver cancer (p‐overall = 0.0002, p‐nonlinear = 0.1807).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that pre‐diagnostic serum albumin is inversely and linearly associated with cancer risk among the Chinese population. This study provides evidence that albumin may be valuable to the prediction and stratification of cancer risk in the general population. However, the biological mechanism and clinical significance remain to be elucidated. Population studies with longer follow‐up time as well as experimental studies are further required.