Platelet-Rich Plasma for Sport-Active Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: Limited Return to Sport

Percutaneous Interventions for Injuries in Athletes: Implications on Return to Play

For nonsurgical musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries in athletes, image-guided percutaneous intervention may aid in recovery and decrease return to play (RTP) time. These interventions fall into two major categories: to reduce inflammation (and therefore alleviate pain) or to promote healing. This review describes the risks and benefits of the various percutaneous interventions in MSK athletic injury and surveys the literature regarding the implication of these interventions on RTP.

Intra-articular injections in sport-active patients with degenerative cartilage lesions or osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review was to analyse the available clinical evidence on intra-articular knee injections for the treatment of degenerative cartilage lesions and osteoarthritis (OA) in sport-active patients.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in July 2023 according to the PRISMA guidelines on three electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science). Studies addressing intra-articular injections for degenerative knee cartilage lesions or knee OA in sport-active patients were included. The Downs and Black's "checklist for measuring quality" was used to evaluate risk of bias and quality of the included studies.

RESULTS

Only 10 clinical studies for a total of 296 sport-active patients were included, with a publication trend increasing over time. The studies were 9 case series and 1 RCT; 7 studies focused on hyaluronic acid (HA), 2 studies focused on platelet-rich plasma (PRP), while 1 study compared HA and PRP. Overall, safety and positive clinical findings were for both HA and PRP, although not always with satisfactory results in terms of return to sport. The Downs and Black evaluation showed an overall poor quality of the included studies, with an average score of 21.1 points (range 19-25).

CONCLUSIONS

The available clinical evidence is still limited, with only a few studies published and an overall low-quality of evidence, suggesting a potential role of HA and PRP injections to treat these patients. However, further high-level trials are needed to confirm the real benefits of these treatments for the management of sport-active patients affected by degenerative cartilage lesions or OA of the knee.

Platelet-Rich Plasma for Intra-articular Injections: Preclinical and Clinical Evidence

The use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been supported by encouraging data from in vitro and preclinical in vivo studies, both in terms of safety and efficacy. This led to the wide use of PRP injections in the clinical practice, with promising results especially as a minimally invasive treatment for cartilage degeneration and osteoarthritis (OA). While many controversies remain on the best PRP formulation, the overall available clinical studies support the benefits of PRP, with functional improvement and reduction of pain-related symptoms up to 12 months, especially in young patients and early OA stages.

Bone marrow aspirate concentrate injections provide similar results versus viscosupplementation up to 24 months of follow-up in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. A randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

The purpose of this double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to compare clinical improvement and radiographic findings up to 2 years of follow-up of a single intra-articular injection of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) versus hyaluronic acid (HA) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). The hypothesis was that BMAC injection could lead to better clinical and radiographic results compared to viscosupplementation.

METHODS

Patients with bilateral knee OA were randomized to one intra-articular injection of tibial-derived BMAC in one knee and one HA injection in the contralateral knee. Sixty patients were enrolled, and 56 were studied up to the final follow-up (35 men, 21 women, mean age 57.8 ± 8.9 years), for a total of 112 knees. Patients were evaluated before the injection and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months with the IKDC subjective score, VAS for pain, and the KOOS score. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient treatment judgement, and adverse events were documented, as well as bilateral X-Rays (Rosenberg view) before and after treatment.

RESULTS

No severe adverse events nor differences were reported in terms of mild adverse events (7.1% vs 5.4%, p = ns) and treatment failures (10.7% vs 12.5%, p = ns) in BMAC and HA groups, respectively. The IKDC subjective score improved from baseline to all follow-ups for BMAC (p < 0.0005), while it improved up to 12 months (p < 0.0005) and then decreased at 24 months (p = 0.030) for HA. Compared to HA, BMAC showed a higher improvement for VAS pain at 12 (2.2 ± 2.6 vs 1.7 ± 2.5, p = 0.041) and 24 months (2.2 ± 2.6 vs 1.4 ± 2.8, p = 0.002). The analysis based on OA severity confirmed this difference only in Kellgren-Lawrence 1-2 knees, while comparable results were observed in moderate/severe OA. Radiographic evaluation did not show knee OA deterioration for both treatment groups, without intergroup differences.

CONCLUSION

BMAC did not demonstrate a clinically significant superiority at short-term compared to viscosupplementation, reporting overall comparable results in terms of clinical scores, failures, adverse events, radiographic evaluation, MCID achievement, and patient treatment judgment. However, while HA results decreased over time, BMAC presented more durable results in mild OA knees.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Combined subchondral and intra-articular injections of bone marrow aspirate concentrate provide stable results up to 24 months

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and imaging findings up to 24 months of follow-up in patients treated with combined subchondral and intra-articular bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) injections for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients (19 males, 11 females) aged between 40 and 75 years (mean age 56.4 ± 8.1 years) with unilateral symptomatic knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence 2-3) were included in the study. Patients were treated with combined intra-articular and subchondral bone BMAC injections (total 9 ml) under fluoroscopic control. IKDC subjective score, VAS for pain, KOOS, and EQ-VAS were prospectively evaluated up to 24 months. Radiographs were performed at baseline and at 24 months after the procedure. MRI was evaluated with the WORMS score at baseline, 6-12 months, and 24 months of follow-up. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v.19.0 and for all tests p < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

No major complications and a 13% failure rate were reported. The IKDC subjective score remained stable from 62.6 ± 19.4 at 12 months to 63.4 ± 17.1 at 24 months (both p < 0.0005 compared to baseline, 40.5 ± 12.5). Similar improvements were reported for all KOOS subscales, while EQ-VAS did not report any significant improvement. VAS pain worsened from 3.0 ± 1.9 at 12 months to 4.4 ± 1.8 at the final follow-up (p = 0.0001), although remaining lower compared to the baseline value of 6.3 ± 1.8 (p = 0.002). The radiographic evaluation did not reveal signs of improvement or deterioration of the OA grade. The MRI findings showed a worsening in marginal osteophytes and synovitis, but a significant reduction of bone marrow edema at 24 months (p < 0.0005).

CONCLUSION

Combined intra-articular and subchondral BMAC injections provided clinical and imaging benefits up to 24 months for the treatment of symptomatic knee OA, with durable clinical results, a low failure rate, and a significant reduction of bone marrow edema.

Microfragmented Adipose Tissue Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial at 2-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Intra-articular microfragmented adipose tissue (MF-AT) injections have been proposed for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA).

PURPOSE

To compare a single injection of MF-AT or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in terms of clinical outcomes and OA progression.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

A total of 118 patients with symptomatic knee OA were randomized to receive a single intra-articular injection of MF-AT or PRP. Patients were evaluated before the injection and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months with the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales, EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), EuroQol 5 dimensions (EQ-5D), and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain. Primary outcomes were the IKDC subjective score and the KOOS pain subscore at 6 months. Knees were evaluated at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months with radiography and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using the Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS).

RESULTS

Both MF-AT and PRP provided a statistically and clinically significant improvement up to 24 months. The improvement in the IKDC subjective score from baseline to 6 months was similar in both MF-AT (41.1 ± 16.3 to 57.3 ± 18.8) and PRP (44.8 ± 17.3 to 58.4 ± 18.1) groups (P < .0005). The improvement in the KOOS pain subscore from baseline to 6 months was similar in both the MF-AT (58.4 ± 15.9 to 75.8 ± 17.4) and PRP (63.5 ± 17.8 to 75.5 ± 16.1) groups (P < .0005). Overall, no differences were found between the MF-AT and PRP groups in terms of clinical outcomes, adverse events (18.9% and 10.9%, respectively), and failures (15.1% and 25.5%, respectively). Radiographic and MRI findings did not show changes after the injection. As a secondary outcome, more patients in the MF-AT group with moderate/severe OA reached the minimal clinically important difference for the IKDC score at 6 months compared with the PRP group (75.0% vs 34.6%, respectively; P = .005).

CONCLUSION

A single intra-articular injection of MF-AT was not superior to PRP, with comparable low numbers of failures and adverse events and without disease progression. No differences were found in clinical and imaging results between the 2 biological approaches.

Effect and Related Mechanism of Platelet-Rich Plasma on the Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells

Objective

Human adipose-derived stem cells (hADSCs) are ideal seed cells for the regeneration of alveolar bone defects. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), which is rich in growth factors, promotes tissue repair. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether PRP promotes the osteogenic differentiation of hADSCs and to perform high-throughput sequencing to explore the possible mechanism.

Methods

hADSCs were divided into the three following groups: CON group, OM group, and PRP group. Osteogenesis was detected by Alizarin Red staining on day 14. Total RNA was extracted from the OM and PRP groups for high-throughput sequencing. The target genes of the differentially expressed osteogenic-related miRNAs were predicted, and combined miRNA/mRNA analysis was then performed. The mRNA and protein expression levels of hsa-miR-212-5p, type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CNR1), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), Runx2, osteocalcin (OCN), and collagen 1 A1 (COL1A1) in the OM and PRP groups were detected by qRT–PCR and Western blot analyses. The binding between hsa-miR-212-5p and CNR1 was detected by a dual-luciferase reporter assay.

Results

Both the OM and PRP groups exhibited enhanced proliferation of hADSCs, and the differences at 48 h and 72 h were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The PRP group had significantly more calcium nodules than the CON group (P < 0.05). Through high-throughput sequencing analysis, differential miRNA and mRNA expression profiles were obtained. During hADSC osteogenesis, the expression of hsa-miR-212-5p was downregulated, and the expression of CNR1 was upregulated. hsa-miR-212-5p was found to bind directly to the 3′ UTR of CNR1.

Conclusions

The present findings indicated that downregulation of hsa-miR-212-5p and upregulation of CNR1 may be involved in the process by which PRP promotes the osteogenic differentiation of hADSCs.

Does Bone Marrow Edema Influence the Clinical Results of Intra-Articular Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis?

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is increasingly used for the intra-articular treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, clinical studies on PRP injections reported controversial results. Bone marrow edema (BME) can cause symptoms by affecting the subchondral bone and it is not targeted by intra-articular treatments. The aim of this study was to investigate if the presence of BME can influence the outcome of intra-articular PRP injections in knee OA patients. A total of 201 patients were included in the study, 80 with and 121 without BME at the baseline MRI. BME area and site were evaluated, and BME was graded using the Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS). Patients were assessed with International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales, the EuroQol-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS), and the Tegner score at baseline, 2, 6, and 12 months. Overall, the presence of BME did not influence the clinical results of intra-articular PRP injections in these patients treated for knee OA. Patients with BME presented a similar failure rate and clinical improvement after PRP treatment compared to patients without BME. The area and site of BME did not affect clinical outcomes. However, patients with a higher BME grade had a higher failure rate.

Meniscus treatment: biological augmentation strategies: a narrative review

Objective

An up-to-date description on the biological augmentation strategies for meniscal repair procedures was performed to highlight the main preclinical and clinical evidence available in the literature.

Background

Meniscal repair is a key surgical procedure to preserve as much meniscal tissue as possible to limit the development of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Unfortunately, the results of meniscal repair procedures are not always satisfactory, reporting an overall risk of failure of 25%, likely conditioned due to the poor vascularization of the meniscal tissue. For this reason, several biologic augmentation techniques have been developed to improve the meniscal healing process, ranging from mechanical stimulations to biological products.

Methods

A literature review was conducted on the main biological augmentation procedures combined to the meniscal repair process. A description of the rationale, surgical technique, and preclinical and clinical evidence was performed.

Conclusions

Mechanical stimulations and fibrin clot were the first techniques applied showing several limitations and not exciting results. Recently, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) augmentation to meniscal repair is slowly spreading in the clinical practice. Early evidence from comparative studies showed a significantly lower failure rate in patients treated with PRP augmentation compared with controls. Conversely, the current few and low-level data on mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) for meniscal augmentation repair make this a promising but anecdotal topic. Further high-quality clinical studies are needed to support and guide the use of biological strategies for the augmentation of meniscus repair, PRP.

Intra-Articular Injections of Autologous Adipose Tissue or Platelet-Rich Plasma Comparably Improve Clinical and Functional Outcomes in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis

The use of biologic therapies for the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA) has largely increased in recent years. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficiency and the therapeutic potential of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and autologous adipose tissue (AAT) injections as a treatment for knee OA. Sixty participants were enrolled in the study: 20 healthy ones and 40 with minimal to moderate knee OA (KL I-III). The OA patients were randomly assigned either to the PRP or to the AAT group. The PRP samples showed a low expression level of NF-κB-responsive gene CCL5 and high expression levels of classic inflammatory and TNF-l INF responses. The AAT injection product was prepared using a Lipogems device, and its regenerative potential as well as the ability for expansion of mesenchymal stem cells were tested in the cell culture conditions. The patient assessments were carried out five times. Significant improvement was observed regardless of the treatment method in the VAS, KOOS, WOMAC and IKDC 2000 subjective evaluations as well as in the functional parameters. Intra-articular injections of AAT or PRP improved pain, symptoms, quality of life and functional capacity with a comparable effectiveness in the patients with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis.

Leukocyte-Rich versus Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is gaining large interest in clinical practice as a minimally invasive injective treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA). Different preparation methods are available, and the presence of leukocytes, deemed detrimental in some preclinical studies, is one of the most debated aspects regarding PRP efficacy.

PURPOSE

To compare the safety and effectiveness of leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP) and leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP) for the treatment of knee OA.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

A total of 192 patients with symptomatic knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 1-3) were randomly allocated to 3 weekly injections of LR-PRP or LP-PRP. LP-PRP was obtained with a filter for leukodepletion. LR-PRP and LP-PRP were divided into aliquots of 5 mL, with a mean platelet concentration of 1146.8 × 10⁹/L and 1074.9 × 10⁹/L and a mean leukocyte concentration of 7991.4 × 10⁶/L and 0.1 × 10⁶/L, respectively. Patients were evaluated at baseline and thereafter at 2, 6, and 12 months for the primary outcome, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score; and for secondary outcomes, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales, EuroQol-visual analog scale (EQ-VAS), and Tegner score.

RESULTS

No differences between groups were observed in terms of absolute values or improvement of the clinical scores across all follow-up intervals. The mean IKDC subjective score at baseline and 12 months improved from 45.6 to 60.7 in the LR-PRP group as compared with 46.8 to 62.9 in the LP-PRP group (P = .626). No severe adverse events were described in either group, although 15 mild adverse events (knee pain or swelling) were reported: 12.2% for LR-PRP and 4.7% for LP-PRP (P = .101). No statistically significant difference was also found between LR-PRP and LP-PRP in terms of failures (7.8% vs 3.5%, P = .331).

CONCLUSION

This double-blind randomized trial showed that 3 intra-articular LR-PRP or LP-PRP injections produced similar clinical improvement in the 12 months of follow-up in patients with symptomatic knee OA. Both treatment groups reported a low number of adverse events, without intergroup differences. The presence of leukocytes did not significantly affect the clinical results of PRP injections.

REGISTRATION

NCT02923700 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Platelet-rich plasma injections induce disease-modifying effects in the treatment of osteoarthritis in animal models

PURPOSE

The mechanisms of action and disease-modifying potential of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection for osteoarthritis (OA) treatment are still not fully established. The aim of this systematic review of preclinical evidence was to determine if PRP injections can induce disease-modifying effects in OA joints.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed on animal studies evaluating intra-articular PRP injections as treatment for OA joints. A synthesis of the results was performed investigating the disease-modifying effects of PRP by evaluating studies that compared PRP with OA controls or other injectable products, different PRP formulations or injection intervals, and the combination of PRP with other products. The risk of bias was assessed according to the SYRCLE's tool.

RESULTS

Forty-four articles were included, for a total of 1251 animals. The publication trend remarkably increased over time. PRP injections showed clinical effects in 80% and disease-modifying effects in 68% of the studies, attenuating cartilage damage progression and reducing synovial inflammation, coupled with changes in biomarker levels. Evidence is limited on the best PRP formulation, injection intervals, and synergistic effect with other injectables. The risk of bias was low in 40%, unclear in 56%, and high in 4% of items.

CONCLUSION

Intra-articular PRP injections showed disease-modifying effects in most studies, both at the cartilage and synovial level. These findings in animal OA models can play a crucial role in understanding mechanism of action and structural effects of this biological approach. Nevertheless, the overall low quality of the published studies warrants further preclinical studies to confirm the positive findings, as well as high-level human trials to demonstrate if these results translate into disease-modifying effects when PRP is used in the clinical practice to treat OA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Subchondral and intra-articular injections of bone marrow concentrate are a safe and effective treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a prospective, multi-center pilot study

PURPOSE

Subchondral bone is becoming a treatment target for knee OA patients, with promising early findings on the use of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC). The aim of this prospective, multi-centric pilot study was to evaluate safety as well as clinical and MRI outcomes of a combined approach of intra-articular and subchondral BMAC injections.

METHODS

Thirty patients (19 men, 11 women, 56.4 ± 8.1 years) with symptomatic knee OA were treated with a combination of an intra-articular and two subchondral BMAC injections (femoral condyle and tibial plateau). Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 1-3-6-12 months of follow-up with the IKDC subjective, VAS, KOOS, and EQ-VAS scores. The MRI evaluation was performed with the WORMS score.

RESULTS

No major complications were reported and only two patients were considered treatment failures, requiring a new injective or surgical treatment. The IKDC subjective score improved significantly from 40.5 ± 12.5 to 59.9 ± 16.1 at 3 months, 59.1 ± 12.2 at 6 months, and 62.6 ± 19.4 at 12 months (p < 0.0005). A similar improvement was reported for VAS pain and all KOOS subscales at all follow-ups, while EQ-VAS did not show any significant improvement. The MRI analysis showed a significant bone marrow edema reduction (p = 0.003), while the remaining WORMS parameters did not show any significant changes.

CONCLUSION

The pilot evaluation of this combined BMAC injective treatment showed safety and positive outcome up to 12 months of follow-up in patients with symptomatic knee OA associated with subchondral bone alterations. These findings suggest that targeting both subchondral bone and joint environment can provide promising results, and that BMAC can be a valid option for this combined approach to treat knee OA.

Emerging and New Treatment Options for Knee Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent type of arthritis worldwide, resulting in pain and often chronic disability and a significant burden on healthcare systems globally. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), analgesics, intra-articular corticosteroid injections are of little value in the long term, and opioids may have ominous consequences. Radiotherapy of knee OA has no added value. Physical therapy, exercises, weight loss, and lifestyle modifications may give pain relief, improve physical functioning and quality of life. However, no single treatment has regenerating potential for damaged articular cartilage. Due to a better understanding of osteoarthritis, innovative new treatment options have been developed. In this narrative review, we focus on emerging OA knee treatments, relieving symptoms, and regenerating damaged articular cartilage that includes intra-articular human serum albumin, conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), lipid-lowering agents (statin), nerve growth factors antagonists, bone morphogenetic protein, fibroblast growth factors, Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP), Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC), exosomes, interleukin-1 blockers, gene-based therapy, and bisphosphonate.

Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis Treated With PRP Injection

Background:

Although several injection-based treatments have been proposed to address knee osteoarthritis (OA), it is often difficult to understand the clinical relevance of the obtained results. The psychometric measures of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) were developed to better interpret study findings.

Purpose:

To establish the MCID and the PASS for the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective score and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in patients treated with intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections for knee OA.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

This study included 215 patients with knee OA (68% men, 32% women; age, 53.2 ± 11.3 years; body mass index, 26.8 ± 4.3 kg/m²) who underwent intra-articular PRP injections. Patients were assessed through the IKDC Subjective score and KOOS subscales, and the MCID and the PASS for both measures were independently calculated at 6 and 12 months post-injection. The MCID was calculated using the value equal to half of the standard deviation of the overall cohort improvement. The PASS was assessed using a 2-point scale (satisfied or not satisfied), with threshold values being detected through a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and the Youden index to maximize the sensitivity and the specificity of the threshold values.

Results:

All scores improved significantly from baseline to 6 months and baseline to 12 months (P < .001 for all scores). All scores were stable from 6 to 12 months except for the KOOS Quality of Life subscale, which improved further (P = .033). For the IKDC, the MCID values were 8.6 and 8.5 points and the PASS scores were 59.7 and 62.1 at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Overall, the MCID and the PASS for all KOOS subscales remained constant at the 2 follow-up points. The percentage of patients who achieved the MCID and the PASS was higher than 85% at both 6 and 12 months post-injection.

Conclusion:

This study provided the MCID and PASS thresholds for the IKDC and KOOS scores in patients with knee OA treated with PRP injections. These psychometric measures may allow a better interpretation of the clinical relevance of injection-based treatment outcomes for knee OA.

Autologous Platelet- and Extracellular Vesicle-Rich Plasma Is an Effective Treatment Modality for Chronic Postoperative Temporal Bone Cavity Inflammation: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Purpose

To determine the efficacy of autologous platelet- and extracellular vesicle-rich plasma (PVRP) to treat chronic postoperative temporal bone cavity inflammation (CPTBCI) after exhausting surgical and standard conservative therapies.

Materials and Methods

Patients were randomly allocated to treatment with PVRP (PVRP group) or standard conservative methods (control group) in a setting of four once-monthly checkups and subsequent follow-up. The treatment outcome was measured with the Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12 (COMQ-12), CPTBCI focus surface area, and CPTBCI symptom-free time after the fourth checkup.

Results

Eleven patients from each group completed the trial; 95% of patients suffered from chronically discharging mastoid cavity (the type of CPTBCI). Within four checkups, the COMQ-12 score decreased statistically significantly in the PVRP group (p < 0.001) but not in the control group (p = 0.339). The CPTBCI foci surface area decreased statistically significantly between the first and second checkups (p < 0.0005) but not between other checkups (p > 0.05) in the PVRP group. No statistically significant differences in CPTBCI foci surface area were detected between checkups in the control group (p = 0.152). Nine patients from the PVRP group and three patients from the control group were CPTBCI symptom-free at the fourth checkup. The median symptom-free time was 9.2 months (95% CI [7.4, 11.9]) in the PVRP group. Cumulatively, 49% of patients in the PVRP group remained CPTBCI symptom-free for 12.7 months after the fourth checkup.

Conclusion

Autologous PVRP represents a novel additional and successful treatment modality for a chronically discharging radical mastoid cavity when the surgical and standard conservative treatment methods have been exhausted.

Trial Number

https://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04281901).

Platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: an expert opinion and proposal for a novel classification and coding system

INTRODUCTION

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is able to modulate the joint environment by reducing the inflammatory distress and promoting tissue anabolism. Therefore, it has gained increasing popularity among clinicians in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA), and it is currently proposed beside consolidated options such as viscosupplementation.

AREAS COVERED

A systematic review of all available meta-analyses evaluating intra-articular PRP injections in patients affected by knee OA was performed, to understand how this biologic treatment approach compares to the traditional injective therapies available in clinical practice. Moreover, a novel coding system and 'minimum reporting requirements' are proposed to improve future research in this field and promote a better understanding of the mechanisms of action and indications.

EXPERT OPINION

The main limitation in the current literature is the extreme variability of PRP products used, with often paucity or even lack of data on the biologic features of PRP, which should not be considered as a simple substance, but rather a 'procedure' requiring accurate reporting of the characteristics of the product but also all preparation and application modalities. This approach will aid in matching the optimal PRP product to specific patient factors, leading to improved outcomes and the elucidation of the cost-effectiveness of this treatment.

Evidence on ankle injections for osteochondral lesions and osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the evidence supporting safety and effectiveness of intra-articular injective treatments for ankle lesions ranging from osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) to osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

A systematic review and a meta-analysis were performed on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library in March 2020. Safety was evaluated through the reported side effects and effectiveness through the scores used. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias 2.0 tool and the Downs and Black checklist. For each outcome, the quality of evidence was graded according to GRADE guidelines.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies (21 for OA, 3 for OLT) were included on hyaluronic acid (HA), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), saline, methylprednisolone, botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and prolotherapy. No severe adverse events were reported. For OLT, a comparison was possible between HA and PRP showing no significant difference. For ankle OA, a significant difference favouring HA versus saline was documented at six months (p < 0.001). The GRADE level of evidence was very low.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis supports the safety of intra-articular treatment for ankle OA and OLT, while only a very low evidence supports the efficacy of HA in terms of better results versus placebo for the treatment of ankle OA, and other conclusions are hindered by the scarcity of the available literature. This urges further and stronger trials to specifically investigate potential and limitations of these different injective approaches for the treatment of OLT and ankle OA.