High-Score US-Suspicious Subcentimeter Thyroid Nodules: What Factors Affect Adequate Sampling of US-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy?

Nondiagnostic Fine Needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: Review of Predisposing Factors

OBJECTIVE

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules is the gold standard screening test for thyroid malignancy. Unfortunately, FNA may produce insufficient material for diagnosis. If nodules requiring FNA with a higher risk for nondiagnostic (ND) cytology could be identified pre-procedure, this might allow better patient guidance and potentially facilitate an altered approach to FNA.

METHODS

The literature investigating risk factors for ND cytology was reviewed, including studies of patient factors, sonographic or nodule factors, and procedural factors. Twenty-five studies that included assessment of at least two potential factors in ND outcomes for initial FNA were identified. Individual factors were evaluated in terms of the general consensus of studies reporting either a positive significant association with ND cytology or no association.

RESULTS

Most patient and nodule factors lack consensus as far as their association with ND cytology across these studies. Factors where there are some consensuses include practitioner experience, depth of nodule, and cystic content; however, hypervascularity of the nodule does not appear to have a consensus.

CONCLUSION

A number of study design improvements suggested by this review could realistically be incorporated into higher powered future studies. Novel factors such as tissue composition anterior to the nodule or the age of the patient could also be investigated in future work. Operator experience is the most convincing procedural factor, and approaches to future studies of the FNA technique itself are proposed. That said, the factors with consensus among studies can be seen leading candidates for this future research, and the published studies illuminate a number of as yet unexplored factors that could in many cases be studied retrospectively.

Influence of maximum diameter on fine-needle aspiration biopsy outcomes in ACR TI-RADS 5 thyroid nodules

Introduction

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy is a widely accepted method for diagnosing thyroid nodules. However, the influence of maximum diameter (MD) of ACR TIRADS 5 (TR5) thyroid nodules on the FNA outcomes remains debated. This study examined the influence of MD on the FNA outcomes and investigated the optimal MD threshold for FNA in TR5 nodules.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 280 TR5 thyroid nodules from 226 patients who underwent FNA from January to June 2022 in our department. Probably malignant (PM) group was defined as Bethesda V in cytopathology with confirmed BRAF V600E mutation or Bethesda VI, the other cytopathology outcomes were defined as probably benign (PB) group. We examined factors influencing malignant cytopathology outcomes and determined the optimal MD threshold for FNA in TR5 nodules using logistic regression and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis.

Results

Among these nodules, 58.2% (163/280) had PM outcomes. The PM group had a significantly larger MD than the PB group [6.5mm (range 5.0-8.4) vs. 5.3mm (range 4.0-7.0), p < 0.001]. In multivariate logistic regression fully adjusted for confounders, MD was significantly associated with PM outcomes [odds ratio 1.16, 95%CI 1.05-1.31; p = 0.042]. The highest quartile of MD had a greater likelihood of PM outcomes compared to the lowest quartile [odds ratio 4.71, 95% CI 1.97-11.69, p = 0.001]. The RCS analysis identified 6.2 mm as the optimal MD threshold for FNA in TR5 nodules.

Conclusion

MD significantly affects the probability of malignant outcomes in FNA of TR5 thyroid nodules. A MD threshold of ≥6.2mm is suggested for FNA in these nodules.

Update on the Evaluation of Thyroid Nodules

Thyroid nodules (TN) are prevalent in the general population and represent a common complaint in clinical practice. Most are asymptomatic and are associated with a 7%-15% risk of malignancy (1). Methods: PubMed and Medline were searched for articles with a focus on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of TN over the past 5 y. Results: The increase in frequency of imaging has led to a rise in the incidence of incidentally diagnosed TN. The initial evaluation of a TN includes assessing thyroid function, clinical risk factors, and neck imaging. Ultrasound remains the gold standard for assessing TN morphology, and biopsy is the standard method for determining whether a TN is benign. Recently published risk stratification systems using morphologic characteristics on ultrasonography have been effective in reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies. Advances in molecular testing have reduced the number of surgical procedures performed for diagnostic purposes on asymptomatic TN with indeterminate cytology. Scintigraphy is the first-line study for assessing a hyperfunctioning nodule. Many TN can be followed clinically or with serial ultrasound after the initial diagnosis. Surgical intervention is warranted when local symptoms are present, in patients with clinical risk factors, as well as in most situations with malignant cytology. Active surveillance is an option in cases of micropapillary thyroid cancer. Emerging nonsurgical approaches for treating TN include ethanol ablation for TN; sclerotherapy for thyroid cysts; and thermal techniques, such as radiofrequency ablation, laser ablation, microwaves, and high-intensity focused ultrasound. Conclusion: Most TN are benign and can be safely monitored. The indications for biopsy and frequency of imaging should be tailored on the basis of risk stratification. Treatment options should be individualized for each patient's particular situation. Active surveillance should be considered in certain cases of papillary microcarcinoma.

The Role of Cytology in the Diagnosis of Subcentimeter Thyroid Lesions

Thyroid nodules are common and typically detected by palpation and/or ultrasound (US). Guidelines have defined the management of large nodules, but controversy exists regarding nodules ≤ 1 cm. We evaluated a cohort of patients with subcentimeter nodules to determine their rate of malignancy (ROM). A total of 475 thyroid FNAs of lesions ≤ 1 cm with available follow-up were identified from January 2015–December 2019. For comparative analysis, we added a control series of 606 thyroid lesions larger than 1 cm from the same reference period. All aspirates were processed with liquid-based cytology and classified according to The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC). Subcentimeter nodules were stratified as 35 category I—non-diagnostic cases (ND; 7.3%), 144 category II—benign lesions (BL; 30.3%), 12 category III—atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS; 2.5%), 12 category IV—follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm (FN/SFN; 2.5%), 124 category V—suspicious for malignancy (SM; 26.1%), and 148 category VI—positive for malignancy (PM; 31.1%). A total of 307 cases (64.6%) underwent subsequent surgery. Only one ND and three BLs had a malignant outcome. ROM for indeterminate lesions (III + IV) was 3.2%; with 1.6% for category III and 3.2% for category IV. ROM for the malignant categories (V + VI) was 88.2%. The control cohort of lesions demonstrated a higher number of benign histological diagnoses (67.3%). We documented that 57.2% of suspected subcentimeter lesions were malignant, with a minor proportion that belonged in indeterminate categories. There were very few ND samples, suggesting that aspirates of subcentimeter lesions yield satisfactory results. Suspected US features in subcentimeter lesions should be evaluated and followed by an interdisciplinary team for appropriate patient management.