Systemic Inflammation Response Index Predicts Survival Outcomes in Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients Treated with Standard Stupp Protocol

The effect of indicators of CALLY index on survival in glioblastoma

INTRODUCTION

Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain tumor in adults. Recently, research has been published on the potential prognostic indicators associated with different types of cancer. Due to the limited availability of data investigating the relationship between the CALLY index and glioblastoma patients, we aimed to conduct this study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2017 and December 2023, we conducted a study on patients diagnosed with glioblastoma. We collected demographic data and routine laboratory tests at the time of admission. To calculate the CALLY index, we used the formula (albumin value × lymphocyte count) / CRP value × 104. Parameters were compared for in-hospital mortality across different groups.

RESULTS

The study analyzed 202 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 165 (81.7%) were classified as "survivors" and 37 (18.3%) as "deceased." A comparison of hematologic parameters between the two groups showed a significantly lower CALLY index in the "deceased" group (3.05 (4.92)) compared to the "survivor" group (10.13 (13.69)) (p < 0.001). The study compared the parameters between groups with regard to in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of the study, we conclude that the CALLY index can be considered an easily applicable indicator for the mortality of glioblastoma patients.

Systemic immune-inflammation index in dural arteriovenous fistula: a feasible biomarker reflecting its clinical characteristics

PURPOSE

The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), a marker of systemic inflammation, can be calculated using peripheral blood tests. Although the SII has been reported as a feasible biomarker in various cerebrovascular diseases, no studies have explored in dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF). A retrospective cohort study was performed to test whether the SII reflects the clinical characteristics of DAVF and whether this index could serve as a feasible biomarker.

METHODS

This study included 28 patients who underwent endovascular treatment (39 sessions) for DAVF between 2014 and 2023. The SII was calculated using the following formula: platelet count multiplied by neutrophil count divided by lymphocyte count. We investigated the correlation between the SII and various clinical characteristics of DAVF, including symptom manifestation, and digital subtraction angiography findings. Additionally, we compared pre- and post-endovascular treatment changes in the SII.

RESULTS

A significantly higher SII was observed in patients with multiple lesions, clinical symptoms (particularly aggressive symptoms), pseudophelebitic pattern (PPP), and sinus occlusion. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the presence of symptoms (coefficient 270.9, P = 0.021) and PPP (coefficient 272.4, P = 0.017) were independent factors contributing to SII elevation. Notably, following endovascular treatment, there was a significant decrease in the elevated SII in patients whose symptoms resolved (P = 0.039) and where the DAVF was angiographically cured (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Elevation of the SII in patients with advanced DAVF and its decrease following endovascular treatment suggests that the SII reflects the disease condition and indicates its potential as a promising biomarker.

Systemic and local immunosuppression in glioblastoma and its prognostic significance

The effectiveness of tumor therapy, especially immunotherapy and oncolytic virotherapy, critically depends on the activity of the host immune cells. However, various local and systemic mechanisms of immunosuppression operate in cancer patients. Tumor-associated immunosuppression involves deregulation of many components of immunity, including a decrease in the number of T lymphocytes (lymphopenia), an increase in the levels or ratios of circulating and tumor-infiltrating immunosuppressive subsets [e.g., macrophages, microglia, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and regulatory T cells (Tregs)], as well as defective functions of subsets of antigen-presenting, helper and effector immune cell due to altered expression of various soluble and membrane proteins (receptors, costimulatory molecules, and cytokines). In this review, we specifically focus on data from patients with glioblastoma/glioma before standard chemoradiotherapy. We discuss glioblastoma-related immunosuppression at baseline and the prognostic significance of different subsets of circulating and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (lymphocytes, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, Tregs, natural killer (NK) cells, neutrophils, macrophages, MDSCs, and dendritic cells), including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), focus on the immune landscape and prognostic significance of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant gliomas, proneural, classical and mesenchymal molecular subtypes, and highlight the features of immune surveillance in the brain. All attempts to identify a reliable prognostic immune marker in glioblastoma tissue have led to contradictory results, which can be explained, among other things, by the unprecedented level of spatial heterogeneity of the immune infiltrate and the significant phenotypic diversity and (dys)functional states of immune subpopulations. High NLR is one of the most repeatedly confirmed independent prognostic factors for shorter overall survival in patients with glioblastoma and carcinoma, and its combination with other markers of the immune response or systemic inflammation significantly improves the accuracy of prediction; however, more prospective studies are needed to confirm the prognostic/predictive power of NLR. We call for the inclusion of dynamic assessment of NLR and other blood inflammatory markers (e.g., absolute/total lymphocyte count, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, systemic immune-inflammation index, and systemic immune response index) in all neuro-oncology studies for rigorous evaluation and comparison of their individual and combinatorial prognostic/predictive significance and relative superiority.

The need for paradigm shift: prognostic significance and implications of standard therapy-related systemic immunosuppression in glioblastoma for immunotherapy and oncolytic virotherapy

Despite significant advances in our knowledge regarding the genetics and molecular biology of gliomas over the past two decades and hundreds of clinical trials, no effective therapeutic approach has been identified for adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, and overall survival remains dismal. Great hopes are now placed on combination immunotherapy. In clinical trials, immunotherapeutics are generally tested after standard therapy (radiation, temozolomide, and steroid dexamethasone) or concurrently with temozolomide and/or steroids. Only a minor subset of patients with progressive/recurrent glioblastoma have benefited from immunotherapies. In this review, we comprehensively discuss standard therapy-related systemic immunosuppression and lymphopenia, their prognostic significance, and the implications for immunotherapy/oncolytic virotherapy. The effectiveness of immunotherapy and oncolytic virotherapy (viro-immunotherapy) critically depends on the activity of the host immune cells. The absolute counts, ratios, and functional states of different circulating and tumor-infiltrating immune cell subsets determine the net immune fitness of patients with cancer and may have various effects on tumor progression, therapeutic response, and survival outcomes. Although different immunosuppressive mechanisms operate in patients with glioblastoma/gliomas at presentation, the immunological competence of patients may be significantly compromised by standard therapy, exacerbating tumor-related systemic immunosuppression. Standard therapy affects diverse immune cell subsets, including dendritic, CD4+, CD8+, natural killer (NK), NKT, macrophage, neutrophil, and myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC). Systemic immunosuppression and lymphopenia limit the immune system's ability to target glioblastoma. Changes in the standard therapy are required to increase the success of immunotherapies. Steroid use, high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and low post-treatment total lymphocyte count (TLC) are significant prognostic factors for shorter survival in patients with glioblastoma in retrospective studies; however, these clinically relevant variables are rarely reported and correlated with response and survival in immunotherapy studies (e.g., immune checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, and oncolytic viruses). Our analysis should help in the development of a more rational clinical trial design and decision-making regarding the treatment to potentially improve the efficacy of immunotherapy or oncolytic virotherapy.

Systemic inflammation response index is a useful indicator in distinguishing MOGAD from AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD

Objective

To identify reliable immune-inflammation indicators for distinguishing myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) from anti-aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG)-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). To assess these indicators' predictive significance in MOGAD recurrence.

Methods

This study included 25 MOGAD patients, 60 AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD patients, and 60 healthy controls (HCs). Age and gender were matched among these three groups. Participant clinical and imaging findings, expanded disability status scale (EDSS) scores, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) information, and blood cell counts were documented. Subsequently, immune-inflammation indicators were calculated and compared among the MOGAD, AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD, and HC groups. Furthermore, we employed ROC curve analysis to assess the predictive performance of each indicator and binary logistic regression analysis to assess potential risk factors.

Results

In MOGAD patients, systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), CSF white cell count (WCC), and CSF immunoglobulin A (IgA) levels were significantly higher than in AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD patients (p = 0.038, p = 0.039, p = 0.021, respectively). The ROC curves showed that SIRI had a sensitivity of 0.68 and a specificity of 0.7 for distinguishing MOGAD from AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD, with an AUC of 0.692 (95% CI: 0.567-0.818, p = 0.0054). Additionally, compared to HCs, both MOGAD and AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD patients had higher neutrophils, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), SIRI, and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). Eight (32%) of the 25 MOGAD patients had recurrence within 12 months. We found that the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR, AUC = 0.805, 95% CI = 0.616-0.994, cut-off value = 0.200, sensitivity = 0.750, specificity = 0.882) was an effective predictor of MOGAD recurrence. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that MLR below 0.200 at first admission was the only risk factor for recurrence (p = 0.005, odds ratio =22.5, 95% CI: 2.552-198.376).

Conclusion

Elevated SIRI aids in distinguishing MOGAD from AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD; lower MLR levels may be linked to the risk of MOGAD recurrence.

Systemic Inflammation Response Index Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) After the Treatment of Intravenous Thrombolysis

BACKGROUND

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is one of the most important means of therapy for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). After cerebral infarction, the inflammatory response fulfills an essential role in the pathobiology of stroke, affecting the process of recanalization. Hence, we evaluated the usefulness of the systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) for the prognosis of patients with AIS.

METHODS

A total of 161 patients suffering from AIS were retrospectively analyzed. SIRI was introduced and calculated using the absolute neutrophil, monocyte, and lymphocyte numbers from the admission blood work. The study outcomes were determined using a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at the 3-month timepoint, and a favorable clinical outcome was calculated in the mRS score range of 0 to 2. The analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was performed to determine the values of the optimal cutoff of SIRI for the prediction of clinical outcomes. In addition, multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the association between clinical outcomes and SIRI.

RESULTS

The ROC curve analysis revealed that the ideal SIRI cutoff was at 2.54 [area under the curve, 78.85%; 95% CI, 71.70% to 86.00%; sensitivity, 70.89%; and specificity, 84.14%]. Multivariate analysis indicated that SIRI ≤2.54 (odds ratio, 1.557, 95% CI, 1.269 to 1.840; P =0.021) was an independent predictor of favorable clinical outcomes in patients suffering from AIS after treatment with IVT.

CONCLUSIONS

We preliminary speculate that SIRI may serve as an independent predictor of clinical outcomes with AIS following IVT.

Preoperative Immune-Inflammatory Status of the Patients With Newly-Diagnosed Glioblastoma - Could It Genuinely Predict Their Survival?

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive brain tumor affecting adult patients, with an extremely reduced overall survival despite rapid diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, it is crucial to establish accurate and affordable markers that allow an individualized approach to GBM patients. Serum biomarkers could be the most accessible, as complete blood counts should be performed on all GBM patients before undergoing any surgical and/or pharmacological treatment. However, their prognostic role is still unclear. Our study aims to assess the influence of various hematological markers of inflammation in predicting the outcome of GBM patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all adult patients diagnosed with primary glioblastoma in the Neurosurgery Department of the Emergency Clinical County Hospital of Târgu Mureș, Romania, from January 2017 until December 2019. We aimed to discover whether the immune/inflammatory status of the patients before receiving any kind of pharmacological or surgical treatment influenced their overall survival.

RESULTS

Our study showed that pre-therapeutic elevated white blood count could predict reduced overall survival in not otherwise specified subtype (NOS) of GBMs (HR 0.4153, 95% CI 0.1825-0.9449, p 0.0362). Furthermore, patients with increased systemic immune response index (SIRI) had much larger tumors at the time of diagnosis (p 0.0359). In wild type, isocitrate dehydrogenase subpopulation (IDHwt), the higher values of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR, p 0.0412), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR, p 0.0376) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR, p 0.0412) were related to more advanced age at the moment of diagnosis. Moreover, our results revealed a weakly positive association between tumor size and NLR values in the NOS group (Spearman r 0.3212, p 0.0493).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study does not provide enough evidence for the immune/inflammatory status of GBM patients to be used as an efficient prognostic marker to guide the therapeutic approach.

Prognostic Values of Systemic Inflammatory Immunological Markers in Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Neutrophils are an important part of the tumor microenvironment, which stimulates inflammatory processes through phagocytosis, degranulation, release of small DNA fragments (cell-free DNA), and presentation of antigens. Since neutrophils accumulate in peripheral blood in patients with advanced-stage cancer, a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio can be a biomarker of a poor prognosis in patients with glioblastoma. The present study aimed to explore the prognostic value of the preoperative levels of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to better predict prognostic implications in the survival rate of glioblastoma patients.

METHODS

The meta-analysis was carried out according to the recommendations and standards established by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Databases of PubMed, EBSCO, and Medline were systematically searched to select all the relevant studies published up to December 2022.

RESULTS

Poorer prognoses were recorded in patients with a high NLR or PLR when compared with the patients with a low NLR or PLR (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.24-1.83, p < 0.0001 and HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.10-1.63, p < 0.01, respectively). Similarly, a worse prognosis was reported for patients with a higher cfDNA (HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.27-4.36, p < 0.01). The SII and SIRI values were not related to glioblastoma survival (p = 0.0533 and p = 0.482, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, NLR, PLR, and cfDNA, unlike SII and SIRI, appeared to be useful and convenient peripheral inflammatory markers to assess the prognosis in glioblastoma.

Preoperative systemic inflammation response index is an independent prognostic marker for BCG immunotherapy in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer

BACKGROUND

The Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI) is a novel prognostic biomarker based on peripheral blood counts of neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes. Recent evidence suggests that it is associated with poor prognosis in various cancers. However, the predictive value of the SIRI in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients treated with intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) immunotherapy remains elusive. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the potential of SIRI as a prognostic factor in these patients.

METHODS

A total of 540 patients with NMIBC who underwent BCG immunotherapy following transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) were enrolled in this study. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the Youden index, patients were divided into high and low SIRI groups based on the cutoff values. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of BCG non-response. Thereafter, propensity score matching (PSM) was used to eliminate bias due to confounding factors between the low and high SIRI groups. Finally, the Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups.

RESULTS

Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that high SIRI (p = 0.001), high MLR (p = 0.015), and high tumor pathological T stage (p = 0.015) were significantly correlated with non-response to BCG therapy. In addition, both RFS and PFS were shorter in the high SIRI group than in the other group before and after PSM (both p < 0.05). Collectively, our results indicate that the combination of tumor pathological T staging and the SIRI can enhance the predictive power of BCG response.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment peripheral blood SIRI can be employed to predict the response to BCG immunotherapy and the prognosis of NMIBC patients. Taken together, the combination of T stage and SIRI demonstrated robust performance in predicting the response to BCG immunotherapy in NMIBC patients.

Prognostic capacity of the systemic inflammation response index for functional outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Objective

We aimed to investigate the relationship between systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) and functional outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed involving all consecutive aSAH patients admitted to our institution. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was performed to determine the functional outcomes of all patients at 3 months after aSAH. Results were categorized as favorable (mRS score 0-2) and unfavorable (mRS score 3-6). Univariate and multivariate logistic regressive analyses were utilized to identify the prognostic significance of SIRI. To minimize the effects of confounding factors, patients were stratified according to the optimal cut-off value of SIRI with propensity score matching (PSM). Further subgroup analysis was conducted to verify the consistency of our findings and Pearson's correlation analysis was used to assess the relationship between SIRI and the severity of aSAH.

Results

In this study, 350 patients were enrolled and 126 (36.0%) of them suffered unfavorable outcomes. The SIRI of 5.36 × 10⁹/L was identified as the optimal cut-off value. Two score-matched cohorts (n = 100 in each group) obtained from PSM with low SIRI and high SIRI were used for analysis. A significantly higher unfavorable functional outcome rate was observed in patients with high SIRI before and after PSM (p < 0.001 and 0.017, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that SIRI value ≥ 5.36 × 10⁹/L was an independent risk factor for poor outcomes (OR 3.05 95% CI 1.37-6.78, p = 0.006) after adjusting for possible confounders. A identical result was discovered in the PSM cohort. In ROC analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) of SIRI was 0.774 which shown a better predictive value than other inflammatory markers observed in previous similar studies. Pearson's correlation analysis proved the positive association between SIRI and aSAH severity.

Conclusions

Elevated SIRI at admission is associated with worse clinical status and poorer functional outcomes among patients with aSAH. SIRI is a useful inflammatory marker with prognostic value for functional outcomes after aSAH.

Pretreatment Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value Efficiently Predicts Survival Outcomes in Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients Receiving Radiotherapy and Temozolomide

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to determine the predictive significance of pretreatment pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) who received postsurgical radiation (RT) and concurrent plus adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ).

Methods

The outcomes of 204 newly diagnosed GBM patients were analyzed retrospectively. Each eligible patient's PIV was calculated using the findings of peripheral blood platelet (P), monocyte (M), neutrophil (N), and lymphocyte (L) counts obtained on the first day of therapy: PIV = P × M × N ÷ L. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to discover the ideal cutoff values for PIV concerning progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes. The primary and secondary end-points were the OS and PFS divergences across the PIV groups.

Results

In ROC curve analysis, the optimal PIV cutoff was 385, which substantially interacted with PFS and OS results and categorized patients into low PIV (L-PIV; N = 75) and high PIV (H-PIV; N = 129) groups. Comparative survival analyses showed that the patients in the H-PIV group had significantly shorter median PFS (6.0 vs. 16.6 months; P < 0.001) and OS (11.1 vs. 22.9 months; P < 0.001) durations than those in the L-PIV group. The results of multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated an independent and significant connection between an H-PIV measure and shorter PFS and OS outcomes.

Conclusions

The novel PIV was able to independently stratify newly diagnosed GBM patients into two groups with fundamentally different PFS and OS outcomes following RT and concurrent plus adjuvant TMZ.

The Clinical Value of Systemic Inflammatory Response Index and Inflammatory Prognosis Index in Predicting 3-Month Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients with Intravenous Thrombolysis

Purpose

Systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) was an independent predictor of the prognosis of many diseases. Inflammatory prognostic index (IPI) was a new inflammatory prognostic marker with certain clinical significance. We aimed to explore the association between SIRI, IPI and early stage severity of stroke as well as 3-month outcome of AIS patients.

Patients and Methods

A total of 63 AIS patients who treated with alteplase were selected. The patients were divided into mild group and moderate to severe group according to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores. According to the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score, patients were divided into the good prognosis group and the poor prognosis group. Spearman correlation statistically analyzed the correlation between SIRI, IPI and NIHSS score. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyzed the risk factors of 3-month prognosis. ROC curve was adopted to predict the effect of SIRI and IPI levels on poor prognosis in AIS patients.

Results

Spearman analysis showed that there was positively correlated with NIHSS score and IPI in mild AIS group (r=0.541, P<0.05). Compared with the mild group, SIRI and IPI in the moderate to severe group was significantly higher (P<0.05). The SIRI and IPI in the poor prognosis group were significantly higher than those in the good prognosis group (P<0.05). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that SIRI and IPI were independent prognostic factors for the 3-month prognosis of AIS patients (P< 0.05). The ROC curve showed that the areas under the 3-month prognosis curve predicted by SIRI and IPI were 0.685, 0.774 respectively.

Conclusion

IPI is correlated with stroke severity at admission. SIRI and IPI are independent predictors of short-term prognosis in AIS patients. SIRI and IPI can be a novel the good short-term prognostic biomarker for AIS patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis.

Chronically Radiation-Exposed Survivor Glioblastoma Cells Display Poor Response to Chk1 Inhibition under Hypoxia

Glioblastoma is the most malignant primary brain tumor, and a cornerstone in its treatment is radiotherapy. However, tumor cells surviving after irradiation indicates treatment failure; therefore, better understanding of the mechanisms regulating radiotherapy response is of utmost importance. In this study, we generated clinically relevant irradiation-exposed models by applying fractionated radiotherapy over a long time and selecting irradiation-survivor (IR-Surv) glioblastoma cells. We examined the transcriptomic alterations, cell cycle and growth rate changes and responses to secondary radiotherapy and DNA damage response (DDR) modulators. Accordingly, IR-Surv cells exhibited slower growth and partly retained their ability to resist secondary irradiation. Concomitantly, IR-Surv cells upregulated the expression of DDR-related genes, such as CHK1, ATM, ATR, and MGMT, and had better DNA repair capacity. IR-Surv cells displayed downregulation of hypoxic signature and lower induction of hypoxia target genes, compared to naïve glioblastoma cells. Moreover, Chk1 inhibition alone or in combination with irradiation significantly reduced cell viability in both naïve and IR-Surv cells. However, IR-Surv cells’ response to Chk1 inhibition markedly decreased under hypoxic conditions. Taken together, we demonstrate the utility of combining DDR inhibitors and irradiation as a successful approach for both naïve and IR-Surv glioblastoma cells as long as cells are refrained from hypoxic conditions.

Prognostic Values of Combined Ratios of White Blood Cells in Glioblastoma: A Retrospective Study

In some malignant tumours, the changes in neutrophil counts in relation to other blood cells are connected with unfavourable prognosis. Nevertheless, the prognostic value of the combinations of the haematological components in glioblastoma (GBM) remains under dispute. The clinical significance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), systemic immune inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) was investigated in our study. We retrospectively studied 358 patients (males n = 195; females n = 163) aged 59.9 ± 13.5 yrs with newly diagnosed glioma and admitted to the Neurosurgery Centre. Routine blood tests and clinical characteristics were recorded within the first hour of hospital admission. The inflammatory variables: NLR, SII and SIRI exceeded the reference values and were significantly elevated in Grade 3 and Grade 4 tumour. The Cox model analysis showed that the age ≥ 63 years, NLR ≥ 4.56 × 10³/µL, SII ≥ 2003 × 10³/µL and SIRI ≥ 3.03 × 10³/µL significantly increased the risk of death in Grade 4 tumour patients. In the inflammatory variables, NLR demonstrated the highest impact on the survival time (HR 1.56; 95% CI 1.145–2.127; p = 0.005). In the first Polish study including GBM patients, the age in relation to simple parameters derived from complete blood cell count were found to have prognostic implications in the survival rate.

Serum Proteomics in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: Peripheral Blood Immune Response to Treatment

In this real-world study, the aims were to prospectively evaluate the expression of inflammatory proteins in serum collected from head and neck cancer patients before and after treatment, and to assess whether there were differences in expression associated with treatment modalities. The mixed study cohort consisted of 180 patients with head and neck cancer. The most common tumor sites were the oropharynx (n = 81), the oral cavity (n = 53), and the larynx (n = 22). Blood tests for proteomics analysis were carried out before treatment, 7 weeks after the start of treatment, and 3 and 12 months after the termination of treatment. Sera were analyzed for 83 proteins using an immuno-oncology biomarker panel (Olink, Uppsala, Sweden). Patients were divided into four treatment groups: surgery alone (Surg group, n = 24), radiotherapy with or without surgery (RT group, n = 94), radiotherapy with concomitant cisplatin (CRT group, n = 47), and radiotherapy with concomitant targeted therapy (RT Cetux group, n = 15). For the overall cohort, the expression levels of 15 of the 83 proteins changed significantly between the pretreatment sample and the sample taken 7 weeks after the start of treatment. At 7 weeks after the start of treatment, 13 proteins showed lower expression in the CRT group compared to the RT group. The majority of the inflammatory proteins had returned to their pretreatment levels after 12 months. It was clearly demonstrated that cisplatin-based chemoradiation has immunological effects in patients with head and neck cancer. This analysis draws attention to several inflammatory proteins that are of interest for further studies.

New markers to predict the response to omalizumab in chronic spontaneous urticaria

Omalizumab has high treatment efficacy in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) who do not respond to high doses of antihistamines. Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) were described as novel inflammatory and prognostic biomarkers. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of SII and SIRI in patients with CSU who receive omalizumab therapy. A total of 124 patients with severe urticaria who had an Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days (UAS-7) ≥28 were included in the study. UAS-7, C-reactive protein (CRP), SII, and SIRI values ​​were recorded before and after omalizumab treatment. Patients with UAS-7 ≤ 6 at week 12 and/or week 24 of omalizumab treatment were considered responders. Three months after omalizumab treatment, significant decreases were observed in SII, SIRI, CRP, and UAS-7 compared to pre-treatment values ​​(p:0.003, p < 0.001, p:0.006, and p < 0.001, respectively). At the third and sixth months of treatment, baseline SII and SIRI levels of the omalizumab responder group were significantly higher than the non-responder group (p < 0.001). However, there was no difference in baseline CRP and UAS-7 levels between responders and non-responders (p˃0.05). After adjusting for confounding factors, only pre-treatment SII (OR: 1.002, 95% CI: 1.000-1.004, p: 0.036) and SIRI (OR: 4.334, 95% CI: 1.751-10.726, p:0.002) values were independently associated with response to omalizumab at 3 months in multivariate regression analysis. SII and SIRI could be effectively used to predict the response to omalizumab therapy. More comprehensive studies are needed to validate and elaborate on this relationship.

Irradiation immunity interactions

The immune system can influence cancer development by both impeding and/or facilitating tumour growth and spread. A better understanding of this complex relationship is fundamental to optimise current and future cancer therapeutic strategies. Although typically regarded as a localised and immunosuppressive anti‐cancer treatment modality, radiation therapy has been associated with generating profound systemic effects beyond the intended target volume. These systemic effects are immune‐driven suggesting radiation therapy can enhance anti‐tumour immunosurveillance in some instances. In this review, we summarise how radiation therapy can positively and negatively affect local and systemic anti‐tumour immune responses, how co‐administration of immunotherapy with radiation therapy may help promote anti‐tumour immunity, and how the use of immune biomarkers may help steer radiation therapy‐immunotherapy personalisation to optimise clinical outcomes.

Diagnostic Value of Systemic Inflammatory Response Index for Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection in Patients Undergoing Haemodialysis

Objective

This study was aimed at investigating the diagnostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) for catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) in patients undergoing haemodialysis.

Methods

A total of 296 patients undergoing haemodialysis with vascular access were selected and divided into the infected (58 patients) and uninfected (238 patients) groups. Their aetiological and general characteristics were retrospectively collected. The NLR, PLR, CAR, and SIRI were calculated.

Results

The NLR, PLR, CAR, and SIRI values in the infected group were significantly higher than those in the uninfected group (P < 0.05). After the anti-infective treatment, the NLR, PLR, CAR, and SIRI values in patients with CRBSI were significantly decreased (P < 0.05). The NLR, CAR, and SIRI showed diagnostic efficacy in patients with CRBSI with cut-off values of 4.485 (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.827, 95%confidence interval (CI) = 0.768–0.887), 0.975 (AUC = 0.836, 95%CI = 0.779–0.892), and 3.390 (AUC = 0.947, 95%CI = 0.919–0.976). The CAR and SIRI values in patients with gram-negative bacterial infection were significantly higher than those with gram-positive bacterial infection (P < 0.05). The AUCs of CAR and SIRI were 0.693 (0.537–0.848) and 0.821 (0.700–0.942) in differentiating gram-negative and gram-positive bacterial infections, respectively.

Conclusion

Our results showed SIRI as a novel and efficient indicator for the early diagnosis of CRBSI in patients undergoing haemodialysis.

Systemic Inflammation Response Index as a Prognostic Marker in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 38 Cohorts

Background

The systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), a novel and cost-effective serum biomarker, is associated with prognosis in patients with cancer. However, the prognostic value of the SIRI in cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the potential role of the SIRI as a prognostic indicator in cancer.

Methods

Reports in which the prognostic value of the SIRI in cancer was evaluated were retrieved from electronic databases. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to evaluate the prognostic significance of the SIRI. The odds ratio (OR) was also calculated to explore the association between the SIRI and clinicopathological features.

Results

This study included 30 retrospective studies with 38 cohorts and 10 754 cases. The meta-analysis indicated that a high SIRI was associated with short overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.82-2.29, P < .001) and disease-free survival (DFS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS)/progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.84-2.34, P < .001). Subgroup analysis showed that the prognostic value of the SIRI was significant in all kinds of cancer included. Moreover, the SIRI was significantly correlated with sex, tumor size, T stage, N stage, TNM stage, and lymphovascular invasion.

Conclusion

The pretreatment SIRI could be a promising universal prognostic indicator in cancer.

Prognostic Value of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and Prognostic Nutritional Index in Patients With Medulloblastoma Undergoing Surgical Resection

Background: The progression and metastasis of cancers are associated with systematic immune inflammation and nutritional dysfunction. The systemic immune-inflammation index and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) have shown a prognostic impact in several malignancies. Therefore, our study aimed to evaluate immune inflammation and nutritional index prognostic significance in patients with medulloblastoma (MB).

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 111 patients with MB between 2001 and 2021 at our institution. The optimal cutoff values for systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte/lymphocyte counts ration (MLR), and PNI were evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Clinical characteristics and SII, NLR, MLR, and PNI were tested with the Pearson's chi-squared test. The Kaplan–Meier survival curves and the Cox proportional hazards model were used to evaluate the effects of immune inflammation and nutritional index on overall survival (OS).

Results: Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis determined the optimal SII, NLR, MLR, and PNI cutoff values of 2,278, 14.83, 0.219, and 56.5 that significantly interacts with OS and divided the patients into two groups. Comparative survival analysis exhibited that the high-SII cohort had significantly shorter OS (p = 0.0048) than the low-SII cohort. For the univariate analysis, the results revealed that preoperative hydrocephalus (p = 0.01), SII (p = 0.006), albumin–bilirubin score (ALBI) (p = 0.04), and coSII–PNI were predictors of OS. In the multivariate analysis, preoperative hydrocephalus (p < 0.001), ALBI (p = 0.010), SII (p < 0.001), and coSII–PNI as independent prognostic factors were significantly correlated with OS.

Conclusion: The preoperative SII, ALBI, and coSII–PNI serve as robust prognostic biomarkers for patients with MB undergoing surgical resection.

Systemic Inflammation Response Index is a Prognostic Risk Factor in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing TACE

Background

Mounting evidence has shown that systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), a novel prognostic biomarker based on peripheral lymphocyte, neutrophil and monocyte counts, is associated with poor prognosis for several tumors. However, the prognostic value of SIRI in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is elusive. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the correlation between SIRI and clinical outcomes in these patients.

Methods

A total of 194 consecutive patients who underwent TACE were included in this study. Patients were stratified into high and low SIRI groups based on the cut-off value using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Independent risk factors for tumor response were analyzed using forward stepwise logistic regression. A one-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between low and high SIRI patients. The discriminatory power of the combination of number of tumors and SIRI in predicting initial TACE response was evaluated by ROC analysis.

Results

Patients were divided into high SIRI (> 0.88) and low SIRI (≤ 0.88) groups. High SIRI (p = 0.003) and more than three tumors (p = 0.002) were significantly related to poorer tumor response. Moreover, the low SIRI group had longer PFS and OS than the high SIRI group (both P < 0.05) before and after PSM. Combination of SIRI and number of tumors can improve the predictive ability to predict initial TACE response with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.678.

Conclusion

Pretreatment peripheral blood SIRI was found to be an independent predictor of tumor response and clinical outcomes in patients with HCC undergoing TACE. Patients with high SIRI may have a poor prognosis.

Systemic Inflammation Response Index and Systemic Immune-inflammation Index for Predicting the Prognosis of Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

OBJECTIVES

Inflammatory response plays a pivotal role in the progress of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). As novel inflammatory markers, systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) and systemic immune-inflammation (SII) index could reflect clinical outcomes of patients with various diseases. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether initial SIRI and SII index were associated with prognosis of aSAH patients.

METHODS

A total of 680 patients with aSAH were enrolled. Their prognosis was evaluated with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months, and unfavorable clinical outcome was defined as mRS score of 3-6. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to identify cutoff values of SIRI and SII index for predicting clinical outcomes. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to explore relationships of SIRI and SII index with prognosis of patients.

RESULTS

Optimal cutoff values of SIRI and SII index to discriminate between favorable and unfavorable clinical outcomes were 3.2 × 10⁹/L and 960 × 10⁹/L, respectively (P < 0.001 and 0.004, respectively). In multivariate analysis, SIRI value ≥ 3.2 × 10⁹/L (odds ratio [OR]: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.46-3.24; P = 0.021) and SII index value ≥ 960 × 10⁹/L (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.24-2.74; P = 0.040) were independent predicting factors for poor prognosis after aSAH.

CONCLUSIONS

SIRI and SII index values are associated with clinical outcomes of patients with aSAH. Elevated SIRI and SII index could be independent predicting factors for a poor prognosis after aSAH.