Extrusion of Femtosecond Laser-Implanted Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments in Keratoconic Eyes: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Outcomes

Management of Anterior Stromal Necrosis After Polymethylmethacrylate ICRS: Explantation Versus Exchange With Corneal Allogenic Intrastromal Ring Segments

PURPOSE

To evaluate management of keratoconic eyes with anterior stromal necrosis overlying the intracorneal ring segment (ICRS), by either ICRS explantation alone or exchange with corneal allogenic intrastromal ring segments (CAIRS).

METHODS

Among 643 Intacs SK (Additional Technology, Inc) inserted at one institutional center, 16 eyes (15 patients) with overlying spontaneous anterior stromal necrosis were identified. Data included size of stromal defect and refractive and topographical findings before ICRS insertion, before anterior stromal necrosis, and 6 months after intervention.

RESULTS

The 10-year incidence of anterior stromal necrosis after femtosecond laser-assisted ICRS insertion was 5.5%. Eight eyes underwent ICRS removal only and 8 eyes had ICRS exchanged with CAIRS. In the first group, CDVA worsened from 0.14 before melt to 0.28 logMAR after removal (P = .10), simulated keratometry (SimK) and maximum axial keratometry (Kmax) increased from 44.73 to 46.34 diopters (D) (P = .14) and from 49.23 to 52.26 D (P = .14), respectively, and coma worsened from 0.87 to 1.52 D (P = .02). In the CAIRS group, CDVA of 0.16 before melt improved to 0.11 logMAR postoperatively (P > .99), and topographic indices stabilized with SimK, Kmax, and coma mildly altering from 45.31 to 45.44 D (P > .99), from 49.25 to 49.64 D (P > .99) and from 0.87 to 0.81 D (P > .99), respectively. Whether the ICRS were explanted or exchanged, the visual and topographic mean values were better than those reported before ICRS implantation, whereas higher order aberrations in eyes without CAIRS regressed to levels before ICRS insertion. At the site of melt, thinnest residual stromal thickness averaged 327 µm with ICRS removal and 490 µm with CAIRS. Eyes with larger melt areas resulted in less optimal results with CAIRS implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Early experience in the management of anterior stromal necrosis by exchange of polymethylmethacrylate ICRS with CAIRS seems to avoid stromal thinning and confer better visual and topographic results, which were more pronounced with thicker segments. The benefit of CAIRS in large stromal melts needs to be investigated. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(4):256-263.].

Delayed Perforation of an Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment into the Anterior Chamber: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRSs) are an effective treatment for stabilizing and normalizing corneal shape in patients with keratoconus and other corneal ectasias. Intraoperative segment perforation through the corneal endothelium into the anterior chamber (AC) is an uncommon but known complication. However, perforation into the AC postoperatively is an exceedingly rare complication with only 3 reported cases in the literature. One case was due to Descemet membrane detachment and another due to ocular trauma. In the third case, the mechanism for perforation was unclear. We present the fourth case of delayed ICRS perforation due to silent migration through the endothelium into the AC. We also present all reported cases in the literature of intraoperative and postoperative perforation into the AC.

Astigmatic Change as a Predictor of Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Late Extrusion

PURPOSE

To evaluate changes in keratoconic corneas implanted with intracorneal ring segments (ICRS) that have been explanted due to late extrusion of the segment after >2 years.

SETTING

Vissum Miranza, Alicante, Spain; OftalmoSalud, Lima, Peru; Minya University Hospital, Egypt.

METHODS

Retrospective, multicenter, series of cases of 23 keratoconic corneas that have been implanted for > 2 years and have been explanted due to natural extrusion of the segment. Clinical measures of visual, refractive, topographic, pachymetric and aberrometric data were analyzed. To perform exploratory factor analysis, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test was used to evaluate sampling adequacy. Factor analysis with VARIMAX rotation was used to determine the main factors of the inventory.

RESULTS

Mean time interval 5 years. Topographic findings were reversed nearly to the baseline level after segment explantation (p>0.05). Significant worsened in refractive cylinder was found pre-ICRS extrusion (p<0.05). KMO revealed a suitability of 0.528 in the preimplantation matrix (p<.001), 0.534 in the postimplantation matrix (p<.001), 0.549 in the preexplantation matrix (p=.009). Main factor obtained in the preimplantation moment included keratoconus grade, keratometric readings and visual acuities. After ICRS implantation, the most strength components were the refractive cylinder, CDVA and UDVA. Corneal aberrations were the main factors in the preexplantation analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

ICRS can be safely extracted, with a reversal of the corneal topographic data to the preoperative level. We showed a significant astigmatic change in patients implanted with ICRS before late extrusion of the segment, suggesting the role of this parameter as a prognostic factor of extrusion.

Effects of intracorneal ring segments implementation technique and design on corneal biomechanics and keratometry in a personalized computational analysis

The implementation of intracorneal ring segments (ICRS) is one of the successfully applied refractive operations for the treatment of keratoconus (kc) progression. The different selection of ICRS types along with the surgical implementation techniques can significantly affect surgical outcomes. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the influence of ICRS implementation techniques and design on the postoperative biomechanical state and keratometry results. The clinical data of three patients with different stages and patterns of keratoconus were assessed to develop a three-dimensional (3D) patient-specific finite-element model (FEM) of the keratoconic cornea. For each patient, the exact surgery procedure definitions were interpreted in the step-by-step FEM. Then, seven surgical scenarios, including different ICRS designs (complete and incomplete segment), with two surgical implementation methods (tunnel incision and lamellar pocket cut), were simulated. The pre- and postoperative predicted results of FEM were validated with the corresponding clinical data. For the pre- and postoperative results, the average error of 0.4% and 3.7% for the mean keratometry value ([Formula: see text]) were predicted. Furthermore, the difference in induced flattening effects was negligible for three ICRS types (KeraRing segment with arc-length of 355, 320, and two separate 160) of equal thickness. In contrast, the single and double progressive thickness of KeraRing 160 caused a significantly lower flattening effect compared to the same type with constant thickness. The observations indicated that the greater the segment thickness and arc-length, the lower the induced mean keratometry values. While the application of the tunnel incision method resulted in a lower [Formula: see text] value for moderate and advanced KC, the induced maximum Von Mises stress on the postoperative cornea exceeded the induced maximum stress on the cornea more than two to five times compared to the pocket incision and the preoperative state of the cornea. In particular, an asymmetric regional Von Mises stress on the corneal surface was generated with a progressive ICRS thickness. These findings could be an early biomechanical sign for a later corneal instability and ICRS migration. The developed methodology provided a platform to personalize ICRS refractive surgery with regard to the patient's keratoconus stage in order to facilitate the efficiency and biomechanical stability of the surgery.

A novel Q-value-based nomogram for single intracorneal ring segment implantation versus standard manufacturer's nomogram combined with accelerated cross-linking for treatment of keratoconus: a randomized controlled trial

Purpose

To compare the efficacy of implanting a single Keraring segment according to a novel Q‐value‐based nomogram (QN) to that of segment implantation according to the manufacturer's standard nomogram (SN), for keratoconus treatment.

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized controlled trial of 104 patients (104 eyes) with Amsler‐Krumeich grade 1 or 2 keratoconus, and type 1 or 2 cone asymmetry determined according to manufacturer's classification. They were randomly distributed into two groups: group A patients (n = 52) underwent Keraring implantation according to the SN, and group B patients (n = 52) underwent implantation of a single (210° arc‐length) Keraring segment according to the QN. Both treatments were combined with accelerated transepithelial cross‐linking, and follow‐up was 6 months. Main outcome measures were preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, subjective refraction and corneal topography.

Results

At postoperative month 6, group B exhibited statistically significantly higher values of mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), sphere, K2, K‐average, K‐max and Q‐anterior (p = 0.02, 0.01, 0.002, 0.001, 0.0001 and 0.03, respectively) compared to that of group A. However, group A exhibited better refractive cylindrical improvements (p = 0.04). In group A, we documented spontaneous extrusion of one Keraring segment.

Conclusion

Single 210° arc‐length segment implantation using our objective QN was more efficacious for keratoconus treatment than using the subjective SN. The nomograms were comparable when the Q‐anterior value was >−1.00; however, the QN was superior to the SN when the Q‐anterior value was ≤−1.00. The QN yielded greater postoperative UDVA and smoother corneal remodelling than did the SN for treatment of grade 1 and 2 keratoconic eyes.

Long-Term Visual, Refractive and Topographic Outcomes of KeraRings Combined with Accelerated Transepithelial Crosslinking for Management of Different Grades of Progressive Keratoconus: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose:

To evaluate long-term visual, refractive, and topographic outcomes of KeraRings intrastromal implantation combined with accelerated transepithelial cross-linking for management of different stages of progressive keratoconus.

Materials and Methods:

This retrospective cohort study included 70 eyes of 70 patients with Amsler-Krumeich grades 1 to 4 keratoconus. They were divided into two groups: group-A included 37 eyes with grades 1-2 keratoconus, and group-B included 33 eyes with grades 3-4 keratoconus. Both groups underwent combined Keraring implantation with TCXL treatment. The main outcome measures included the preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, refraction, keratometry readings, and pachymetry.

Results:

At postoperative month 60, group-B exhibited significantly higher values of all mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), sphere/cylinder/spherical equivalent/defocus equivalent (DEQ), and K1/K2/Kaverages/Kmax parameters compared to that of group A. However, group-A exhibited better stability of postoperative improvements. Keratoconus progression (KCP) was greater in group-B (45.5%) than group-A (10.8%). Two eyes revealed segments' migration while one eye showed tunnel vascularization and opacification with segments' migration.

Conclusion:

The diagnostic criteria of preoperative-KCP are not adequate for the diagnosis of postoperative-KCP following ICRS implantation. UDVA and K average posterior seemed to be more sensitive parameters than K max in documenting early postoperative-KCP. We suggest that deterioration of UDVA≥0.10 log MAR and/or K average posterior ≥0.25 D are highly suspicious of post-ring implantation keratoconus progression (PR-KCP). The occurrence of two of the following parameters: Kmax≥0.50 D, Kaverageanterior≥0.50 D, K average posterior ≥0.25 D, or pachymetry≥1.5% thinning, is diagnostic of PR-KCP. The occurrence of two or more of the following parameters: Kmax≥0.50 D, Kaverageanterior≥0.50 D, Kaverageposterior ≥0.25 D, pachymetry≥ 1.5% thinning or UDVA≥0.10 logMAR, is diagnostic of PR-KCP. We also suggest that Kmax≥0.75 D alone is diagnostic of PR-KCP.

Comparison of Visual, Tomographic, and Biomechanical Outcomes of 360 Degrees Intracorneal Ring Implantation With and Without Corneal Crosslinking for Progressive Keratoconus: A 5-Year Follow-up

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term (5 years) results of 360 degrees intracorneal ring (ICR) implantation with and without corneal crosslinking (CXL) in patients with progressive keratoconus (KCN).

METHOD

This historical cohort study was performed on 35 eyes with progressive KCN, which was randomly divided into 2 groups. Fourteen patients were implanted only with ICR, and 21 patients with KCN were treated with ICR plus CXL simultaneously. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and refractive components were collected from patients' medical records. The biomechanical properties of patients were measured using the Corvis ST (Oculus, Inc, Weltzar, Germany). Corneal topography and aberrometry parameters were also recorded from the Pentacam HR device (Oculus).

RESULTS

Both UCVA and CDVA increased in both groups after ICR implantation; however, this improvement was more significant in the ICR plus CXL group (P = 0.002 and P = 0.001, respectively). The mean improvement of CDVA in patients with ICR implantation with and without CXL was 0.56 ± 0.67 and 0.33 ± 0.61, respectively. A comparison of the long-term postoperative Tomographic and Biomechanical Index between 2 groups showed a better result in the ICR plus CXL group (P = 0.012). Topographic findings of the anterior corneal surface (flat-K, steep-K, mean-K, and astigmatism) after surgery were significantly better than before surgery in both groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although ICR implantation alone might halt the KCN progression with acceptable visual, topographic, and biomechanical outcomes, the combination of ICR and CXL has an adjuvant and synergistic effect, especially in long-term follow-up.