Thermoformed Retainer: An Effective Option for Long-Term Stability

Evaluation of the Distortion of Essix Retainer Formed From Biostar Machine Using Intraoral Digital Scans: An In Vitro Study

Introduction Retention is essential to prevent unwanted tooth movement due to growth changes, to allow the gingival and periodontal tissues affected by orthodontic treatment to realign, and to stabilize teeth that have been moved to potentially unstable positions, thus reducing the risk of relapse. This study aimed to evaluate the distortion of Essix retainers over time to enhance their retention and stability. Methods Patients who visited the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics at Ranjeet Deshmukh Dental College & Research Centre, Nagpur, India, after completing their orthodontic treatment were included in the study, according to the established inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 26 patients participated. Each patient received an Essix retainer fabricated from a Duran+ Biostar round sheet (1 mm thickness) using a Biostar machine based on their post-debonded maxillary cast. The patients were instructed on the correct insertion and removal of the Essix retainer. The inner surface of the retainers was scanned at one month, three months, and six months using an intraoral digital scanner. These scans were analyzed and compared for distortion at different time intervals using Medit software. Results The Essix retainers exhibited varying degrees of distortion at different time intervals. Notably, distortion was more significant in the posterior region compared to the anterior region. Additionally, distortion increased over time, with the least amount observed at one month and progressively worsening by the sixth month. Specifically, the average distortion in the posterior region ranged from 0.133 mm after the first month to 0.304 mm after six months. In contrast, the average distortion in the anterior region was lower, ranging from 0.057 mm at one month to 0.068 mm at six months. Conclusions Distortion was more pronounced on the posterior surface of the Essix retainer compared to the anterior region.

Comparison of light transmittance and color changes between polyurethane and copolyester retainer materials after staining and destaining

BACKGROUND

Retainers are the only effective approach to prevent orthodontic relapse. The aim of this study was to compare the changes in color and light-transmittance of rough and smooth thermoformed polyurethane and copolymer retainer samples after staining in different solutions and destaining with different approaches.

METHODS

Four hundred copolyester (Essix® ACE) and 400 polyurethane (Zendura®) samples with different surface textures, smooth and rough, were stained in 4 different solutions (n = 100 per solution) over 28 days. Each of the four groups of 100 stained samples of each material was subdivided into 5 groups of 20 samples and subjected to different destaining solutions. Light transmittance and color changes were evaluated using a spectrometer and a spectrophotometer. Mean differences were compared using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and posthoc multiple comparison tests at P = 0.05.

RESULTS

No significant differences in light transmittance were found between both untreated materials. Both materials were stained in a similar fashion and showed no significant differences between two materials after staining. Coffee and tea stained both materials more significantly than wine, but there was a significant difference of changes of color and light transmittance between rough and smooth surfaces during the destaining in coffee- and tea-stained samples of copolyester material. All destaining solutions were effective at removing all stains on the samples. The surface roughness of the material plays a significant role in the ability of the materials to be destained, demonstrating a more significant greater effect on cleaning rough samples for improvements in light-transmittance and greater changes in color.

CONCLUSIONS

This study concluded that the surface of materials plays a significant role in the material destaining and staining. In addition, the different polymers used for retainer fabrication exhibited different responses during the destaining process depending on types of stains.

Stability of anterior open bite cases treated with upper and lower extrusion arches in adults: a follow-up study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the post-treatment stability of anterior open bite (AOB) cases treated with upper and lower extrusion arches in adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

23 patients with AOB were treated with extrusion arches and evaluated for dentoskeletal changes using lateral cephalometric radiographs before treatment (T0), after treatment (T1), and 12 months post-treatment (T2). Patients received bondable tongue spurs and vacuum-formed retainers as post-treatment retention/stability measures for 12 months. Post-treatment stability was further assessed qualitatively by the Photographic Openbite Severity Index.

RESULTS

All the cases showed positive overlap between the anterior teeth at the end of orthodontic treatment, and 20 of 23 treated patients attended the recall visit after 12 months. A total of 85% of the cases maintained positive overlap at least 1 year post-treatment, 10% showed edge-to-edge bite, and only 5% showed no overbite.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of AOB in adults with extrusion arches proved to be stable 1 year post-treatment. Changes in the overbite after 1 year of follow-up were not significant.

Relapse and inadvertent tooth movement post orthodontic treatment in individuals with fixed retainers: A review

Orthodontists must fully inform patients about the implications of orthodontic treatment and the subsequent need for retention. This review provides an update on relapse, unwanted movements and different factors that can cause loss of stability following orthodontic treatment. Since it is difficult to predict which patients will present some degree of loss of stability after treatment, it is important that they be treated as if they have a high potential for relapse. The present review included a bibliographic search in the main sources of scientific review including Medline via PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane library. The search strategy was carried out until May 5, 2022. Only 34 studies fulfilling the selection criteria. Our results showed that maintaining teeth in the correct position following orthodontic treatment is a great challenge for orthodontists. The etiology of relapse is complex and not yet clearly established. Its origin is attributed to factors such as the time of gingival and periodontal tissue reorganization and changes produced by growth, compromising the stability of the results achieved with orthodontic treatment. The retention phase is necessary after orthodontic treatment to avoid relapse or loss of the occlusion results obtained. However, fixed retainers may induce unwanted tooth movement that may occur despite these retainers being attached and intact. There is currently no consensus among orthodontists regarding the ideal type of wire for fixed containment. We concluded that post-orthodontic treatment relapse is the result of a regression towards the original malocclusion. However, changes in the position of the teeth can also occur, which are considered as unwanted movements and have a multifactorial origin.

Effect of the addition of Chitosan and TiO2nanoparticles on antibacterial properties of an orthodontic composite in fixed orthodontic treatment: a randomized clinical trial study

Due to the existing demands for methods independent of patient co-operation in preventing and overcoming the incidence of white spot lesions (WSLs) and caries in fixed orthodontic treatments, several studies have considered the modification of orthodontic composites using antimicrobial nanomaterials. In this regard, the aim of this study is to investigate the effect of the addition of chitosan nanoparticles (NPs) and TiO₂NPs onStreptococcus mutans(S. mutans) counts and the enamel mineral content in fixed orthodontic patients. A double-blind randomized clinical trial study was carried out in 24 patients (i.e., 48 upper second premolars and 48 maxillary lateral incisors) who were candidates for fixed orthodontic treatment. In the case of the control group, the bracket was bonded to the tooth with an orthodontic adhesive (Transbond XT, 3M Unitek, USA) while, in the experimental group, the bracket was bonded to the tooth with Transbond XT containing 1% chitosan NPs and 1% TiO₂NPs. For the maxillary lateral incisor and upper second premolar teeth, theS. mutanscounts around the brackets were measured, through the usage of real-time PCR, at the time points of 1 day, 2 months, and 6 months after bonding the brackets to the tooth. Furthermore, the enamel mineral content measurement was also performed around the brackets at 1 day, 2 months, and 6 months after bonding the brackets to the tooth. TheS. mutanscounts were analyzed using Friedman and Mann-Whitney U tests. The Repeated measures ANOVA test and Independent samples T-test were also applied, in order to evaluate the mineral content. According to the results, there was a significant reduction in theS. mutanscounts of experimental group at the time points of 1 day, 2 months, and 6 months in both maxillary lateral incisor and upper second premolar teeth. However, we did not observe any significant differences in the control group between the reports at 1 day, 2 months, and 6 months in both maxillary lateral incisor and upper second premolar teeth. The outcomes of this study indicate that, with regard to maxillary lateral incisor teeth, there were no significant differences between the results of the experimental group and control group at the time points of 1 day, 2 months, and 6 months. Furthermore, with respect to the upper second premolar teeth, no significant differences were observed between the two groups at 1 day and 2 months; however,S. mutanscounts were significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group at the time point of 6 months. Moreover, our gathered data confirmed the absence of any significant differences between the experimental group and control group, in terms of enamel mineral content, at the time intervals of 1 day, 2 months, and 6 months. In conclusion, the incorporation of chitosan NPs and TiO₂NPs in orthodontic composites induces an antibacterial property in the resultant adhesive to be used for fixed orthodontic treatment.