Exploring Current Evidence on the Past, the Present, and the Future of the Heart Team: A Narrative Review

Predictors of Mortality Following Aortic Valve Replacement in Aortic Stenosis Patients

Background: Understanding of the risk factors for the development of adverse outcomes after aortic valve replacement is necessary to develop timely preventive measures and to improve the results of surgical treatment. Methods: We analyzed patients with aortic stenosis (n = 742) who underwent surgical treatment in the period 2014−2020. The average age was 63 (57;69) years—men 58%, women 42%. Results: The hospital mortality rate was 3% (22 patients). The following statistically significant threshold values (cut-off points) were obtained in the ROC analysis: aortic cross-clamp time > 93 min AUC (CI) 0.676 (0.640−0.710), p = 0.010; cardiopulmonary bypass time > 144 min AUC (CI) 0.809 (0.778−0.837), p < 0.0001, hemoglobin before op <120 g/L. AUC (CI) 0.762 (0.728−0.793), p < 0.0001, hematocrit before op <39% AUC (CI) 0.755 (0.721−0.786), p < 0.001, end-diastolic dimension index >2.39 AUC (CI) 0.647 (0.607−0.686), p = 0.014, end-systolic dimension index > 1.68 AUC (CI) 0.657 (0.617−0.695), p = 0.009. Statistically significant independent predictors of hospital mortality were identified: BMI > 30 kg/m2 (OR 2.84; CI 1.15−7.01), ischemic heart disease (OR 3.65; CI 1.01−13.2), diabetes (OR 3.88; CI 1.38−10.9), frequent ventricular ectopy before operation (OR 9.78; CI 1.91−50.2), mitral valve repair (OR 4.47; CI 1.76−11.3), tricuspid valve repair (OR 3.06; CI 1.09−8.58), 3 and more procedures (OR 4.44; CI 1.67−11.8). Conclusions: The hospital mortality rate was 3%. The main indicators associated with the risk of death were: diabetes, overweight (body mass index more than 30 kg/m2), frequent ventricular ectopy before surgery, hemoglobin level below 120 g/L, hematocrit level below 39%, longer cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time, additional mitral and tricuspid valve interventions.

Heart Valve Critical Pathway and Heart Valve Clinic: Novel Benchmarks for Modern Management of Valvular Heart Disease

The growing burden of valvular heart disease in Western countries represents a challenge for the daily clinical practice, especially in the light of the ever-increasing number of therapeutic options. The Euro Heart Survey showed that, among elderly subjects with severe, symptomatic valve dysfunction, surgery is denied for 33% of patients with aortic stenosis and for 50% of patients with mitral regurgitation. Current management (from diagnosis to follow-up) is often fragmented in multiple-sometimes unnecessary-steps. Such a "patchy" approach may translate into a suboptimal management, especially in the geriatric population. New healthcare models exist that can coordinate care, reduce fragmentation, limit costs and, ultimately, improve outcomes: the clinical pathways.

Cardionephrology from the point of view of the cardiologist: no more agree to disagree-getting to 'yes' for every patient

Whether one wants to or not, interactions between the heart and the kidneys exist and manifest nevertheless. Both from theoretical and clinical perspectives, it seems the need for a subspecialty of cardionephrology seems justified. Our editorial is a cardiologist perspective on the article by Diez and Ortiz published in Clinical Kidney Journal related to the 'need for a cardionephrology subspecialty'. We analysed the historical similarities of the emergence of already ingrained clinical fields with the current needs in the cardionephrology sector. We motivated our approach based on novel cardiovascular diagnostic and therapeutic developments and significant pathophysiological differences from a cardiological perspective, accounting for the foundation of a novel sustainable medical field. One of the sensitive issues we also addressed was the operationality and applicability of the principles. We answered with some examples from high-risk debatable contexts the question of where a cardionephrologist should be integrated. Clarifying the operationality aspects would be a positive shift towards improving guidelines adherence in managing complex patients. In conclusion, we underline that the necessity of a cardionephrologist must be addressed from an operational and scientific perspective, with the ultimate goal of reducing mortality and complications in cardiorenal patients.

Consensus Decision-Making for the Management of Antiplatelet Therapy before Non-Cardiac Surgery in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents: A Cohort Study

Background

Although antiplatelet therapy (APT) has been recommended to balance ischemic‐bleeding risks, it has been left to an individualized decision‐making based on physicians' perspectives before non‐cardiac surgery. The study aimed to assess the advantages of a consensus among physicians, surgeons, and anesthesiologists on continuation and regimen of preoperative APT in patients with coronary drug‐eluting stents.

Methods and Results

A total of 3582 adult patients undergoing non‐cardiac surgery after percutaneous coronary intervention with second‐generation stents was retrospectively included from a multicenter cohort. Physicians determined whether APT should be continued or discontinued for a recommended period before non‐cardiac surgery. There were 3103 patients who complied with a consensus decision. Arbitrary APT, not based on a consensus decision, was associated with urgent surgery, high bleeding risk of surgery, female sex, and dual APT at the time of preoperative evaluation. Arbitrary APT independently increased the net clinical adverse event (adjusted odds ratio [OR_adj], 1.98; 95% CI, 1.98–3.11), major adverse cardiac event (OR_adj, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.31–7.34), and major bleeding (OR_adj, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.45–3.76) risks. The association was consistently noted, irrespective of the surgical risks, recommendations, and practice on discontinuation of APT.

Conclusions

Most patients were treated in agreement with a consensus decision about preoperative APT based on a referral system among physicians, surgeons, and anesthesiologists. The risk of perioperative adverse events increased if complying with a consensus decision was failed.

Registration

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03908463.