Correlation Analysis of Refractive and Visual Quality after Wavefront-Optimized Laser In Situ Keratomileusis for 50% and 100% Angle Kappa Compensation

Angle Kappa and angle Alpha agreement between Pentacam Scheimpflug system, swept source optical coherence tomography and ray-tracing aberrometry

PURPOSE

To compare the consistency of Pentacam Scheimpflug system (Pentacam® HR), ray-tracing aberrometry (iTrace), and swept source optical coherence tomography (IOLMaster 700) measurements for Angle Kappa and angle Alpha.

METHODS

A prospective randomized cohort study. 86 individuals (86 eyes) aged 19-45 years with best corrected vision of 4.9 or better were randomly selected from January 2022 to December 2022 in a tertiary-level hospital. Angle Kappa and angle Alpha were measured or calculated using Pentacam, iTrace, and IOLMaster 700, respectively.

RESULTS

The mean difference of angle Kappa between any two instruments was not statistically significant, but the mean difference of angle Alpha between both Pentacam and iTrace, Pentacam and IOLMaster 700, and iTrace and IOLMaster 700 was statistically significant (p value <0.001, 0.003, <0.001). The highest consistency of angle Kappa and the narrowest 95% LoA (-0.20 to 0.21) were found between Pentacam and iTrace according to Bland Altman plots, but between Pentacam and IOLMaster 700 according to Mountain plots. Both Bland Altman plots and Mountain plots showed the highest consistency of angle Alpha and the narrowest 95% LoA (-0.14 to 0.24) between Pentacam and iTrace.

CONCLUSION

The mean angle Kappa among Pentacam® HR, iTrace, and IOLMaster 700 had good agreement, and the value of angle Kappa could be output directly, making it more convenient for clinical application. The measured or calculated angle Alpha had poor agreement, and ophthalmologists could refer to measurements from multiple instruments.

Prediction of CW chord as a measure for the eye's orientation axis after cataract surgery from preoperative IOLMaster 700 measurement data

BACKGROUND

The angles alpha and kappa are widely discussed for centring refractive procedures, but they cannot be determined with ophthalmic instruments. The purpose of this study is to investigate the Chang-Waring chord (position of the Purkinje reflex PI relative to the corneal centre) derived from an optical biometer before and after cataract surgery and to study the changes resulting from cataract surgery.

METHODS

The analysis was based on a large dataset of 1587 complete sets of preoperative and postoperative IOMaster 700 biometry measurements from two clinical centres, each containing: valid data for pupil and corneal centre position, the position of the Purkinje reflex PI originated from a coaxial fixation target, keratometry (K), axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), central corneal thickness CCT, and horizontal corneal diameter W2W. The Chang-Waring chord CW was derived from pupil centre and Purkinje reflex PI analysed preoperatively and postoperatively, and a multilinear regression model together with a feedforward neural network algorithm was set up to predict postoperative CW chord from preoperative CW chord, K and biometric distances of the eye.

RESULTS

The Y component of CW chord shows a slight shift in the inferior direction in both left and right eyes, before and after cataract surgery. The X component shows some shift in the temporal direction, which is more pronounced preoperatively and slightly reduced postoperatively but with a larger variation. The change in CW chord from preoperative to postoperative shows a slight shift in the superior and nasal directions. Our algorithms for prediction of postoperative CW chord using preoperative CW chord, keratometry and biometry as input data performed with a multilinear regression and a feedforward neural network approach were able to reduce the variance, but could not properly predict the postoperative CW chord X and Y components.

CONCLUSION

The CW chord as the position of the Purkinje reflex PI with respect to the pupil centre can be directly measured with any biometer, topographer or tomographer with a coaxial fixation light. The mean Y component does not differ between right and left eyes or preoperatively and postoperatively, but the mean temporal shift of the X component preoperatively is slightly reduced postoperatively, but with a larger scatter of the values.