Gonadotropin Stimulation Has Only a Limited Effect on the Concentration of Follicular Fluid Signalling Proteins: An Antibody Array Analysis

Oocyte maturity, oocyte fertilization and cleavage-stage embryo morphology are better in natural compared with high-dose gonadotrophin stimulated IVF cycles

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does high-dose gonadotrophin stimulation have an effect on oocyte and early-stage embryo development?

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study including 616 natural cycle IVF (NC-IVF) and 167 conventional IVF (cIVF) cycles. In total, 2110 oocytes were retrieved and analysed in fresh cycles. In NC-IVF, only human chorionic gonadotrophin was applied to trigger ovulation. In cIVF, antagonist protocols with daily 150-300 IU of human menopausal gonadotrophins were performed. The effect of gonadotrophins on oocyte and early-stage embryo development was analysed. Primary outcomes were the occurrence of mature (metaphase II) oocytes, zygotes and embryos with good morphology at the cleavage stage 2 days after oocyte retrieval.

RESULTS

The mature oocyte rate (number of mature oocytes/number of retrieved oocytes) was higher in NC-IVF than cIVF cycles (89% versus 82%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.79, P = 0.001), as was the zygote rate per oocyte retrieved (70% versus 58%, aOR 1.76, P = 0.001) and the zygote rate per mature oocyte (79% versus 71%, aOR 1.62, P = 0.001). The percentage of zygotes that developed into cleavage-stage embryos was no different. For the transferred embryos, the probability of having a good embryo morphology with four blastomeres and a fragmentation of <10% (score 0) in cleavage-stage embryos was found to be higher in NC-IVF (proportional aOR for four blastomeres 2.00, P < 0.001; aOR 1.87 for a fragmentation score of 0, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Oocyte maturity, oocyte fertilization and morphology of the cleavage-stage embryo are affected by high-dose gonadotrophin stimulation in fresh IVF cycles.

Gonadotrophin stimulation reduces follicular fluid hormone concentrations and disrupts their quantitative association with cumulus cell mRNA

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do follicular fluid hormone concentrations and the mRNA expression of LHCG, FSH and androgen receptors, aromatase and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) in cumulus granulosa cells differ in naturally matured and stimulated follicles?

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study involving 57 natural cycle IVF (NC-IVF) and 36 conventional gonadotrophin-stimulated IVF (cIVF) cycles performed between 2014 and 2016. cIVF was performed by ovarian stimulation with human menopausal gonadotrophin and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists. Hormone concentrations were determined in the follicular fluid of the leading follicle, and mRNA concentrations were quantified by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in RNA extracted from granulosa cells of the cumulus oophorus complex obtained from these fluids.

RESULTS

Follicular fluid hormone concentrations were significantly lower in cIVF compared with NC-IVF follicles. Median concentrations were 0.50 and 14.5 mIU/ml for LH (P < 0.001), 16.1 and 46.5 nmol/l for testosterone (P < 0.001), 1270 and 2675 nmol/l for oestradiol (P < 0.001), and 12.3 and 28.9 pmol/l for AMH (P < 0.001), respectively. In cumulus granulosa cells, mRNA concentrations for LH receptor, FSH receptor, androgen receptor, aromatase and AMH did not differ between cIVF and NC-IVF follicles. Several hormone and mRNA concentrations were quantitatively associated in natural cycles such as follicular fluid AMH and cumulus granulosa cells AMH RNA (r² = 0.107, P = 0.013), follicular fluid testosterone and cumulus granulosa cell AMH RNA (r² = 0.158, P = 0.002), follicular fluid oestradiol and cumulus granulosa cell AMH RNA (r² = 0.105, P = 0.014) and follicular fluid oestradiol and aromatase (r² = 0.113, P = 0.011). In contrast, these associations were not observed in stimulated cycles.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate some effects of gonadotrophin stimulation on follicular physiology, which could be a cause for the previously suggested lower oocyte quality in cIVF compared with NC-IVF.