Efficacy of MAVIG X-Ray Protective Drapes in Reducing CTO Operator Radiation

Impact of X-Ray Protective Drapes on Operator and Patient Radiation Exposure During Cardiac Catheterization

BACKGROUND

As cardiac catheterization operators are exposed to radiation exposure throughout their careers, optimal radiation protection is crucial. Our study was designed to assess the effects of supplementary protective measures beyond standard radiation protection attire and barriers, measuring their influence on scatter radiation exposure levels for both the operator and the patient.

AIMS

The objective of this trial is to assess the impact of a lead shield on scatter radiation exposure for both the operator and the patient.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, randomized clinical trial in which procedures were allocated to incorporate the use of a reusable lead apron designed to shield the lower body of the patient. Both operators and patients were outfitted with real-time procedure-specific dosimeters to monitor exposure. All patients undergoing radial access procedures were entered into a randomization process. The study's dual primary outcomes included the relative operator dose above (RODt) and under (RODu) the protective gear, as well as the scatter patient radiation dose (RPD), which was calculated as the measured radiation exposure (µSv) standardized against the dose area product (DAP).

RESULTS

Out of 400 procedures that were randomized, data from 346 procedures was complete for analysis. The use of the pelvic shield resulted in a substantial decrease in the RODt and RODu, with reductions of 25% and 40%, respectively (p < 0.0001). There was also a 38% reduction observed in the scatter RPD. In patients with a high BMI, the effectiveness of the pelvic shield varied.

CONCLUSION

Employing an auxiliary pelvic shield significantly diminishes scatter radiation exposure for both the operator and the patient.

Efficacy and User Experience of a Novel X-Ray Shield on Operator Radiation Exposure During Cardiac Catheterization: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Radiation shielding is mandatory during cardiac catheterization, but there is a need to improve efficacy and ease of use.

METHODS

The aim of the study was to assess the shielding effect and user feedback for a novel flexible multiconfiguration x-ray shield (FMX). The 0.5-mm Pb equivalent FMX can be selectively configured to accommodate for variations in patient morphology, access site, and type of procedure with maintained visualization, vascular access, and shielding. To evaluate efficacy, relative operator dose (operator dose indexed for given dose) was measured during 103 consecutive procedures randomized in a 1:1 proportion to the current routine setup or FMX+routine. User feedback was collected on function, relevance, and likelihood of adoption into clinical practice.

RESULTS

Median relative operator dose was 3.63 μSv/µGy·m2×10-3 (IQR, 2.62-6.37) with routine setup and 0.57 μSv/µGy·m2×10-3 (IQR, 0.27-1.06) with FMX+routine, which amounts to an 84.4% reduction (P<0.001). For 500 procedures/year, this corresponds to an estimated yearly dose reduction from 3.6 to 0.7 mSv. User feedback regarding size, functionality, ease of use, likely to use, critical issues, shielding, draping, procedure time, vascular access, patient discomfort, and risk was 99% positive. No critical issues were identified. There was no significant difference in patient radiation exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

The FMX reduces radiation exposure considerably. The FMX represents an effective and attractive solution for radiation protection that can easily be implemented in existing workflow. FMX has potential for general use with maintained visualization, vascular access, and shielding in routine cardiac catheterization.

Effectiveness of staff radiation protection devices for interventional cardiology procedures

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of currently available radioprotective (RP) devices in reducing the dose to interventional cardiology staff, especially to the eye lens and brain.

METHODS

The performances of five RP devices (masks, caps, patient drapes, staff lead and lead-free aprons and Zero-Gravity (ZG) suspended radiation protection system) were assessed by means of Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. A geometry representative of an interventional cardiology setup was modelled and several configurations, including beam projections and staff distance from the source, were investigated. In addition, measurements on phantoms were performed for masks and drapes.

RESULTS

An average dose reduction of 65% and 25% to the eyes and the brain respectively was obtained for the masks by MC simulations but a strong influence of the design was observed. The cap effectiveness for the brain ranges on average between 13% and 37%. Nevertheless, it was shown that only some upper parts of the brain were protected. There was no significant difference between the effectiveness of lead and lead-free aprons. Of all the devices, the ZG system offered the highest protection to the brain and eye lens and a protection level comparable to the apron for the organs normally covered.

CONCLUSION

All investigated devices showed potential for dose reduction to specific organs. However, for masks, caps and drapes, it strongly depends on the design, exposure conditions and staff position. Therefore, for a clinical use, it is recommended to evaluate their effectiveness in the planned conditions of use.

Effect of an optimized X-ray blanket design on operator radiation dose in cardiac catheterization based on real-world angiography

Background

There is increasing concern and focus in the interventional cardiology community on potential long term health issues related to radiation exposure and heavy wearable protection. Optimized shielding measures may reduce operator dose to levels where lighter radioprotective garments can safely be used, or even omitted. X-ray blankets (XRB) are commercially available but suffer from small size and lack of stability. A larger XRB may reduce operator dose but could hamper vascular access and visualization. The aim of this study is to assess shielding effect of an optimized XRB during cardiac catheterization and estimate the potential reduction in annual operator dose based on DICOM Radiation Dose Structured Report (RDSR) data reflecting everyday clinical practice.

Methods

Data accumulated from 7681 procedures over three years in our RDSR repository was used to identify projection angles and radiation doses during cardiac catheterization. Using an anthropomorphic phantom and a scatter radiation detector, radiation dose to the operator (mSv) and patient (dose area product—DAP) was measured for each angiographic projection for three different shielding setups. Relative operator dose (mSv/DAP) was calculated and multiplied by DAP per projection to estimate effect on operator dose.

Results

Adding an optimized XRB to a standard shielding setup comprising a table- and ceiling-mounted shield resulted in a 94.9% reduction in estimated operator dose. The largest shielding effect was observed in left and cranial projections where the ceiling-mounted shield offered less protection.

Conclusions

An optimized XRB is a simple shielding measure that has the potential to reduce operator dose.