1
|
Medhi D, Kamidi SR, Mamatha Sree KP, Shaikh S, Rasheed S, Thengu Murichathil AH, Nazir Z. Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Diagnosing Heart Failure: A Narrative Review. Cureus 2024; 16:e59661. [PMID: 38836155 PMCID: PMC11148729 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) is prevalent globally. It is a dynamic disease with varying definitions and classifications due to multiple pathophysiologies and etiologies. The diagnosis, clinical staging, and treatment of HF become complex and subjective, impacting patient prognosis and mortality. Technological advancements, like artificial intelligence (AI), have been significant roleplays in medicine and are increasingly used in cardiovascular medicine to transform drug discovery, clinical care, risk prediction, diagnosis, and treatment. Medical and surgical interventions specific to HF patients rely significantly on early identification of HF. Hospitalization and treatment costs for HF are high, with readmissions increasing the burden. AI can help improve diagnostic accuracy by recognizing patterns and using them in multiple areas of HF management. AI has shown promise in offering early detection and precise diagnoses with the help of ECG analysis, advanced cardiac imaging, leveraging biomarkers, and cardiopulmonary stress testing. However, its challenges include data access, model interpretability, ethical concerns, and generalizability across diverse populations. Despite these ongoing efforts to refine AI models, it suggests a promising future for HF diagnosis. After applying exclusion and inclusion criteria, we searched for data available on PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library and found 150 relevant papers. This review focuses on AI's significant contribution to HF diagnosis in recent years, drastically altering HF treatment and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diptiman Medhi
- Internal Medicine, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Guwahati, IND
| | | | | | - Shifa Shaikh
- Cardiology, SMBT Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Igatpuri, IND
| | - Shanida Rasheed
- Emergency Medicine, East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Eastbourne, GBR
| | | | - Zahra Nazir
- Internal Medicine, Combined Military Hospital, Quetta, Quetta, PAK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martindale APL, Ng B, Ngai V, Kale AU, Ferrante di Ruffano L, Golub RM, Collins GS, Moher D, McCradden MD, Oakden-Rayner L, Rivera SC, Calvert M, Kelly CJ, Lee CS, Yau C, Chan AW, Keane PA, Beam AL, Denniston AK, Liu X. Concordance of randomised controlled trials for artificial intelligence interventions with the CONSORT-AI reporting guidelines. Nat Commun 2024; 15:1619. [PMID: 38388497 PMCID: PMC10883966 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45355-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials extension for Artificial Intelligence interventions (CONSORT-AI) was published in September 2020. Since its publication, several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of AI interventions have been published but their completeness and transparency of reporting is unknown. This systematic review assesses the completeness of reporting of AI RCTs following publication of CONSORT-AI and provides a comprehensive summary of RCTs published in recent years. 65 RCTs were identified, mostly conducted in China (37%) and USA (18%). Median concordance with CONSORT-AI reporting was 90% (IQR 77-94%), although only 10 RCTs explicitly reported its use. Several items were consistently under-reported, including algorithm version, accessibility of the AI intervention or code, and references to a study protocol. Only 3 of 52 included journals explicitly endorsed or mandated CONSORT-AI. Despite a generally high concordance amongst recent AI RCTs, some AI-specific considerations remain systematically poorly reported. Further encouragement of CONSORT-AI adoption by journals and funders may enable more complete adoption of the full CONSORT-AI guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Benjamin Ng
- Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Christ Church, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Victoria Ngai
- University College London Medical School, London, UK
| | - Aditya U Kale
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Robert M Golub
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Gary S Collins
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine//UK EQUATOR Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David Moher
- Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottowa, ON, Canada
| | - Melissa D McCradden
- Department of Bioethics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Genetics & Genome Biology Research Program, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research & Learning, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Clinical and Public Health, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lauren Oakden-Rayner
- Australian Institute for Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Samantha Cruz Rivera
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research (CPROR), Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Melanie Calvert
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research (CPROR), Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit (BTRU) in Precision Transplant and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Christopher Yau
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Health Data Research UK, London, UK
| | - An-Wen Chan
- Department of Medicine, Women's College Hospital. University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Pearse A Keane
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
| | - Andrew L Beam
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard. T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alastair K Denniston
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
| | - Xiaoxuan Liu
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Magrabi F, Lyell D, Coiera E. Automation in Contemporary Clinical Information Systems: a Survey of AI in Healthcare Settings. Yearb Med Inform 2023; 32:115-126. [PMID: 38147855 PMCID: PMC10751141 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To examine the nature and use of automation in contemporary clinical information systems by reviewing studies reporting the implementation and evaluation of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare settings. METHOD PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, the tables of contents of major informatics journals, and the bibliographies of articles were searched for studies reporting evaluation of AI in clinical settings from January 2021 to December 2022. We documented the clinical application areas and tasks supported, and the level of system autonomy. Reported effects on user experience, decision-making, care delivery and outcomes were summarised. RESULTS AI technologies are being applied in a wide variety of clinical areas. Most contemporary systems utilise deep learning, use routinely collected data, support diagnosis and triage, are assistive (requiring users to confirm or approve AI provided information or decisions), and are used by doctors in acute care settings in high-income nations. AI systems are integrated and used within existing clinical information systems including electronic medical records. There is limited support for One Health goals. Evaluation is largely based on quantitative methods measuring effects on decision-making. CONCLUSION AI systems are being implemented and evaluated in many clinical areas. There remain many opportunities to understand patterns of routine use and evaluate effects on decision-making, care delivery and patient outcomes using mixed-methods. Support for One Health including integrating data about environmental factors and social determinants needs further exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farah Magrabi
- Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - David Lyell
- Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Enrico Coiera
- Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Plana D, Shung DL, Grimshaw AA, Saraf A, Sung JJY, Kann BH. Randomized Clinical Trials of Machine Learning Interventions in Health Care: A Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2233946. [PMID: 36173632 PMCID: PMC9523495 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Despite the potential of machine learning to improve multiple aspects of patient care, barriers to clinical adoption remain. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are often a prerequisite to large-scale clinical adoption of an intervention, and important questions remain regarding how machine learning interventions are being incorporated into clinical trials in health care. OBJECTIVE To systematically examine the design, reporting standards, risk of bias, and inclusivity of RCTs for medical machine learning interventions. EVIDENCE REVIEW In this systematic review, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection online databases were searched and citation chasing was done to find relevant articles published from the inception of each database to October 15, 2021. Search terms for machine learning, clinical decision-making, and RCTs were used. Exclusion criteria included implementation of a non-RCT design, absence of original data, and evaluation of nonclinical interventions. Data were extracted from published articles. Trial characteristics, including primary intervention, demographics, adherence to the CONSORT-AI reporting guideline, and Cochrane risk of bias were analyzed. FINDINGS Literature search yielded 19 737 articles, of which 41 RCTs involved a median of 294 participants (range, 17-2488 participants). A total of 16 RCTS (39%) were published in 2021, 21 (51%) were conducted at single sites, and 15 (37%) involved endoscopy. No trials adhered to all CONSORT-AI standards. Common reasons for nonadherence were not assessing poor-quality or unavailable input data (38 trials [93%]), not analyzing performance errors (38 [93%]), and not including a statement regarding code or algorithm availability (37 [90%]). Overall risk of bias was high in 7 trials (17%). Of 11 trials (27%) that reported race and ethnicity data, the median proportion of participants from underrepresented minority groups was 21% (range, 0%-51%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This systematic review found that despite the large number of medical machine learning-based algorithms in development, few RCTs for these technologies have been conducted. Among published RCTs, there was high variability in adherence to reporting standards and risk of bias and a lack of participants from underrepresented minority groups. These findings merit attention and should be considered in future RCT design and reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dennis L Shung
- Department of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Alyssa A Grimshaw
- Harvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Anurag Saraf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joseph J Y Sung
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Benjamin H Kann
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Program, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liu X, Zhou H, Wang Z, Liu X, Li X, Nie C, Li Y. Fully Convolutional Neural Network Deep Learning Model Fully in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Complicated with Peripheral Neuropathy by High-Frequency Ultrasound Image. COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE 2022; 2022:5466173. [PMID: 35371289 PMCID: PMC8970954 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5466173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This study was aimed at exploring the diagnostic value of high-frequency ultrasound imaging based on a fully convolutional neural network (FCN) for peripheral neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). A total of 70 patients with T2D mellitus were selected and divided into a lesion group (n = 31) and a nonlesion group (n = 39) according to the type of peripheral neuropathy. In addition, 30 healthy people were used as controls. Hypervoxel-based and FCN-based high-frequency ultrasound images were used to examine the three groups of patients to evaluate their diagnostic performance and to compare the changes of peripheral nerves and ultrasound characteristics. The results showed that the Dice coefficient (92.7) and mean intersection over union (mIOU) (82.6) of the proposed algorithm after image segmentation were the largest, and the Hausdorff distance (7.6) and absolute volume difference (AVD) (8.9) were the smallest. The high-frequency ultrasound based on the segmentation algorithm showed higher diagnostic accuracy (94.0% vs. 86.0%), sensitivity (87.1% vs. 67.7%), specificity (97.1% vs. 94.2%), positive predictive value (93.1% vs. 86.7%), and negative predictive value (94.4% vs. 84.0%) (P < 0.05). There were significant differences in the detection values of the three major nerve segments of the upper limbs in the control group, the lesion group, and the nonlesion group (P < 0.05). Compared with the nonlesion group, the patients in the lesion group were more likely to have reduced nerve bundle echo, blurred reticular structure, thickened epineurium, and unclear borders of adjacent tissues (P < 0.05). In summary, the high-frequency ultrasound processed by the algorithm proposed in this study showed a high diagnostic value for peripheral neuropathy in T2D patients, and high-frequency ultrasound can be used to evaluate the morphological changes of peripheral nerves in T2D patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoqiang Liu
- Department of Ultrasound, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian City, 116027 Liaoning Province, China
| | - Hongyan Zhou
- Department of Ultrasound, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian City, 116027 Liaoning Province, China
| | - Zhaoyun Wang
- Department of Wound Repair, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian City, 116027 Liaoning Province, China
| | - Xiaoli Liu
- Department of Respiratory, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian City, 116027 Liaoning Province, China
| | - Xin Li
- Department of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian City, 116027 Liaoning Province, China
| | - Chen Nie
- Department of Neurology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian City, 116027 Liaoning Province, China
| | - Yang Li
- Department of Ultrasound, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian City, 116027 Liaoning Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liu Y, Wang Y, Shu Y, Zhu J. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Images under Deep Learning in the Identification of Tuberculosis and Pneumonia. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING 2021; 2021:6772624. [PMID: 34956575 PMCID: PMC8695032 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6772624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
This work aimed to explore the application value of deep learning-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images in the identification of tuberculosis and pneumonia, in order to provide a certain reference basis for clinical identification. In this study, 30 pulmonary tuberculosis patients and 27 pneumonia patients who were hospitalized were selected as the research objects, and they were divided into a pulmonary tuberculosis group and a pneumonia group. MRI examination based on noise reduction algorithms was used to observe and compare the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and carrier-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the images. In addition, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value for the diagnosis efficiency of lung parenchymal lesions was analyzed, and the best b value was selected. The results showed that the MRI image after denoising by the deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) algorithm was clearer, the edges of the lung tissue were regular, the inflammation signal was higher, and the SNR and CNR were better than before, which were 119.79 versus 83.43 and 12.59 versus 7.21, respectively. The accuracy of MRI based on a deep learning algorithm in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis and pneumonia was significantly improved (96.67% vs. 70%, 100% vs. 62.96%) (P < 0.05). With the increase in b value, the CNR and SNR of MRI images all showed a downward trend (P < 0.05). Therefore, it was found that the shadow of tuberculosis lesions under a specific sequence was higher than that of pneumonia in the process of identifying tuberculosis and pneumonia, which reflected the importance of deep learning MRI images in the differential diagnosis of tuberculosis and pneumonia, thereby providing reference basis for clinical follow-up diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yabin Liu
- Clinical Medical College and The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China
| | - Yimin Wang
- Clinical Medical College and The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China
| | - Ya Shu
- Clinical Medical College and The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China
| | - Jing Zhu
- Clinical Medical College and The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China
| |
Collapse
|