Luo Y, Pan R, Rao H, Chen X, Yang H. Association Between Germline
BRCA1/2 Gene Variants and Clinicopathological Features of Ovarian Cancer.
Int J Gen Med 2024;
17:75-84. [PMID:
38226182 PMCID:
PMC10789571 DOI:
10.2147/ijgm.s445660]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective
To investigate the relationship between BRCA1/2 gene mutation and clinicopathological features in ovarian cancer patients, so as to develop precise individualized treatment plan for patients.
Methods
Patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer between January 2018 and July 2023 who underwent BRCA1/2 genetic testing were retrospectively analyzed. The clinicopathological characteristics (age, body mass index (BMI), family history of ovarian cancer, pregnancy history, menopause status, tumor size, histopathology, Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging, and ascites) of non-carriers and BRCA1/2 variant carriers were compared. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the relationship between BRCA1/2 variants and clinicopathological characteristics of ovarian cancer.
Results
A total of 284 ovarian cancer patients were collected, and the subjects were divided into two groups, 197 non-carriers and 87 BRCA1/2 variants carriers. The proportion of serous ovarian carcinoma in BRCA1/2 variant carriers is higher than that in non-BRCA variant carriers (78.2% vs 60.9%, p=0.015). There were 51 patients with BRCA pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant, 22 patients with BRCA likely benign variant, and 14 patients with BRCA variants of uncertain significance (VUS). The proportion of serous ovarian carcinoma in patients with BRCA pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant is higher than that in patients with BRCA likely benign variant and BRCA VUS (94.1% vs 50.0% and 64.3%. p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in BMI, family history of ovarian cancer, pregnancy history, menopause status, maximum diameter of the tumor lesion, FIGO stage, and ascites among patients with different grades of variants. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that serous ovarian carcinoma was related to BRCA mutation (Serous carcinoma vs non-serous carcinoma: OR 2.145, 95% CI: 1.044-4.407) (p=0.038).
Conclusion
Patients with BRCA1 variant develop ovarian cancer at a younger age than those with the BRCA2 variant. The proportion of FIGO stage III-IV in patients with BRCA pathogenic + likely pathogenic variant was significantly higher than those in patients with other variants. Germline BRCA1/2 variants were most frequently identified in serous ovarian carcinoma patients.
Collapse