Landscape of Immune Microenvironment in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer and Establishing Risk Model by Machine Learning

TGFBI: A novel therapeutic target for cancer

TGFBI, an extracellular matrix protein induced by transforming growth factor β, has been found to exhibit aberrant expression in various types of cancer. TGFBI plays a crucial role in tumor cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and apoptosis. It also facilitates invasion and metastasis in various types of cancer, including colon, head and neck squamous, renal, and prostate cancers. TGFBI, a prominent p-EMT marker, strongly correlates with lymph node metastasis. TGFBI demonstrates immunosuppressive effects within the tumor immune microenvironment. Targeted therapy directed at TGFBI shows promise as a potential strategy to combat cancer. Hence, a comprehensive review was conducted to examine the impact of TGFBI on various aspects of tumor biology, including cell proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion, metastasis, apoptosis, and the immune microenvironment. This review also delved into the underlying biochemical mechanisms to enhance our understanding of the research advancements related to TGFBI in the context of tumors.

Integration of local and systemic immunity in ovarian cancer: Implications for immunotherapy

Cancer is a disease that induces many local and systemic changes in immunity. The difficult nature of ovarian cancer stems from the lack of characteristic symptoms that contributes to a delayed diagnosis and treatment. Despite the enormous progress in immunotherapy, its efficacy remains limited. The heterogeneity of tumors, lack of diagnostic biomarkers, and complex immune landscape are the main challenges in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Integrative approaches that combine the tumor microenvironment - local immunity - together with periphery - systemic immunity - are urgently needed to improve the understanding of the disease and the efficacy of treatment. In fact, multiparametric analyses are poised to improve our understanding of ovarian tumor immunology. We outline an integrative approach including local and systemic immunity in ovarian cancer. Understanding the nature of both localized and systemic immune responses will be crucial to boosting the efficacy of immunotherapies in ovarian cancer patients.

The current landscape of predictive and prognostic biomarkers for immune checkpoint blockade in ovarian cancer

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy has evoked a prominent shift in anticancer therapy. Durable clinical antitumor activity to ICB has been observed in patients with ovarian cancer (OC). However, only a subset of patients derive clinical benefit, and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) caused by ICB therapy can lead to permanent tissue damage and even fatal consequences. It is thus urgent to develop predictive biomarkers to optimize patient outcomes and minimize toxicity risk. Herein, we review current predictive and prognostic biomarkers for checkpoint immunotherapy in OC and highlight emerging biomarkers to guide treatment with ICB. The prevalent biomarkers, such as PD-L1 expression status, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, mutational burden, and immune gene signatures, are further discussed. We provide a state-of-the-art survey on prognostic and predictive biomarkers for checkpoint immunotherapy and offer valuable information for guiding precision immunotherapy

The Immune Subtypes and Landscape of Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer

Immunotherapy has played a significant role in the treatment of a variety of hematological and solid tumors, but its application in ovarian cancer (OC) remains unclear. This study aimed to identify immune subtypes of OC and delineate an immune landscape for selecting suitable patients for immunotherapy, thereby providing potent therapeutic targets for immunotherapy drug development. Three immune subtypes (IS1–IS3) with distinctive molecular, cellular, and clinical characteristics were identified from the TCGA and GSE32062 cohorts. Compared to IS1, IS3 has a better prognosis and exhibits an immunological “hot”. IS3, in contrast, exhibits an immunological “cold” and has a worse prognosis in OC patients. Moreover, gene mutations, immune modulators, CA125, CA199, and HE4 expression, along with sensitivity either to immunotherapy or chemotherapy, were significantly different among the three immune subtypes. The OC immune landscape was highly heterogeneous between individual patients. Poor prognosis was correlated with low expression of the hub genes CD2, CD3D, and CD3E, which could act not only as biomarkers for predicting prognosis, but also as potential immunotherapy targets. Our study elucidates the immunotyping and molecular characteristics of the immune microenvironment in OC, which could provide an effective immunotherapy stratification method for optimally selecting patients, and also has clinical significance for the development of new immunotherapy as well as rational combination strategies for the treatment of OC patients.