Prediction of Remnant Liver Regeneration after Right Hepatectomy in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Preoperative CT Texture Analysis and Clinical Features

Evaluation of liver regeneration after hemi-hepatectomy by combining computed tomography and post-operative liver function

Background

Accurate evaluation of postoperative liver regeneration is essential to prevent postoperative liver failure.

Aims

To analyze the predictors that affect liver regeneration after hemi-hepatectomy.

Method

Patients who underwent hemi-hepatectomy in Hangzhou First People's Hospital and Hangzhou Shulan Hospital from January 2016 to December 2021 were enrolled in this study. The regeneration index (RI) was calculated by the following equation: RI = [(postoperative total liver volume {TLVpost} - future liver remnant volume {FLRV}/FLRV] × 100 %. Hepatic dysfunction was defined according to the "TBilpeak>7" standard, which was interpreted as (peak) total bilirubin (TBil) >7.0 mg/dL. Good liver regeneration was defined solely when the RI surpassed the median with hepatic dysfunction. Logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate prognostic factors affecting liver regeneration.

Result

A total of 153 patients were enrolled, with 33 in the benign group and 120 patients in the malignant group. In the entire study population, FLRV% [OR 4.087 (1.405-11.889), P = 0.010], international normalized ratio (INR) [OR 2.763 (95%CI, 1.008-7.577), P = 0.048] and TBil [OR 2.592 (95%CI, 1.177-5.710), P = 0.018] were independent prognostic factors associated with liver regeneration. In the benign group, only the computed tomography (CT) parameter FLRV% [OR, 11.700 (95%CI, 1.265-108.200), P = 0.030] predicted regeneration. In the malignant group, parenchymal hepatic resection rate (PHRR%) [OR 0.141 (95%CI, 0.040-0.499), P = 0.002] and TBil [OR 3.384 (95%CI, 1.377-8.319), P = 0.008] were independent prognostic factors.

Conclusion

FLRV%, PHRR%, TBil and INR were predictive factors associated with liver regeneration.

Short-Term Monitoring of Graft Regeneration in Partial Liver Transplantation Recipients

BACKGROUND Liver regeneration after partial liver transplantation, including living donor liver transplantation and split liver transplantation, is important for successful transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 68 patients who underwent partial liver transplantation and calculated their regeneration index (RI)-based difference in postoperative and preoperative liver volume. We collected clinical data of donors and recipients and analyzed the correlation between clinical characteristics and RI. According to the above results, the generalized estimating equation (GEE) model included white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophils, lymphocytes, platelets, prothrombin time (PT), and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) on Days 1, 3, and 7 after LT and was used to predict the RI. RESULTS The mean RI was 40%, which was used as the cutoff value to divide all patients to the high-RI group and the low-RI group. The percentage of Child-Pugh C patients was 44% in the high-RI group, which was significantly more than that (21%) in the low-RI group (P=0.038). Among the postoperative monitoring parameters, neutrophil (P=0.044) and platelet (P=0.036) levels declined in the high-RI group on Day 3, while APTT was higher on Day 1 compared to the low-RI group. The predictive model based on GEE analysis achieved a good effect, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve on Day 1 (0.681; 95% CI, 0.556-0.807) and Day 3 (0.705; 95% CI, 0.578-0.832) showing significant differences (P=0.010 and 0.004, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The combination of decreased counts of WBC, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and platelets, as well as elevated PT and APTT on Day 3 after LT showed a good capability to predict a higher rate of liver regeneration after partial liver transplantation.

Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion weighted imaging for preoperative evaluation of liver regeneration after hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To explore whether intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameters could evaluate liver regeneration preoperatively.

METHODS

A total of 175 HCC patients were initially recruited. The apparent diffusion coefficient, true diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*), pseudodiffusion fraction (f), diffusion distribution coefficient, and diffusion heterogeneity index (Alpha) were measured by two independent radiologists. Spearman's correlation test was used to assess correlations between IVIM parameters and the regeneration index (RI), calculated as 100% × (the volume of the postoperative remnant liver - the volume of the preoperative remnant liver) / the volume of the preoperative remnant liver. Multivariate linear regression analyses were used to identify the factors for RI.

RESULTS

Finally, 54 HCC patients (45 men and 9 women, mean age 51.26 ± 10.41 years) were retrospectively analyzed. The intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.842 to 0.918. In all patients, fibrosis stage was reclassified as F0-1 (n = 10), F2-3 (n = 26), and F4 (n = 18) using the METAVIR system. Spearman correlation test showed D* (r = 0.303, p = 0.026) was associated with RI; however, multivariate analysis showed that only D value was a significant predictor (p < 0.05) of RI. D and D*showed moderate correlations with fibrosis stage (r = -0.361, p = 0.007; r = -0.457, p = 0.001). Fibrosis stage showed a negative correlation with RI (r = -0.263, p = 0.015). In the 29 patients who underwent minor hepatectomy, only the D value showed a positive association (p < 0.05) with RI, and a negative correlation with fibrosis stage (r = -0.360, p = 0.018). However, in the 25 patients who underwent major hepatectomy, no IVIM parameters were associated with RI (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The D and D* values, especially the D value, may be reliable preoperative predictors of liver regeneration.

KEY POINTS

• The D and D* values, especially the D value, derived from IVIM diffusion-weighted imaging may be useful markers for the preoperative prediction of liver regeneration in patients with HCC. • The D and D* values derived from IVIM diffusion-weighted imaging show significant negative correlations with fibrosis, an important predictor of liver regeneration. • No IVIM parameters were associated with liver regeneration in patients who underwent major hepatectomy, but the D value was a significant predictor of liver regeneration in patients who underwent minor hepatectomy.

Providing higher value care for hepatocellular carcinoma rather than diagnosis: What can current radiologists do?

Medical imaging is of great value for the comprehensive evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma from diagnosis to prognosis, which contributes to optimal clinical management making.