1
|
Bavil AY, Eghan-Acquah E, Diamond LE, Barrett R, Carty CP, Barzan M, Nasseri A, Lloyd DG, Saxby DJ, Feih S. Effect of different constraining boundary conditions on simulated femoral stresses and strains during gait. Sci Rep 2024; 14:10808. [PMID: 38734763 PMCID: PMC11088641 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61305-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Finite element analysis (FEA) is commonly used in orthopaedic research to estimate localised tissue stresses and strains. A variety of boundary conditions have been proposed for isolated femur analysis, but it remains unclear how these assumed constraints influence FEA predictions of bone biomechanics. This study compared the femoral head deflection (FHD), stresses, and strains elicited under four commonly used boundary conditions (fixed knee, mid-shaft constraint, springs, and isostatic methods) and benchmarked these mechanics against the gold standard inertia relief method for normal and pathological femurs (extreme anteversion and retroversion, coxa vara, and coxa valga). Simulations were performed for the stance phase of walking with the applied femoral loading determined from patient-specific neuromusculoskeletal models. Due to unrealistic biomechanics observed for the commonly used boundary conditions, we propose a novel biomechanical constraint method to generate physiological femur biomechanics. The biomechanical method yielded FHD (< 1 mm), strains (approaching 1000 µε), and stresses (< 60 MPa), which were consistent with physiological observations and similar to predictions from the inertia relief method (average coefficient of determination = 0.97, average normalized root mean square error = 0.17). Our results highlight the superior performance of the biomechanical method compared to current methods of constraint for both healthy and pathological femurs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alireza Y Bavil
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies (ADaPT) Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Emmanuel Eghan-Acquah
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies (ADaPT) Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Laura E Diamond
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies (ADaPT) Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Rod Barrett
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies (ADaPT) Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Christopher P Carty
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies (ADaPT) Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Martina Barzan
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies (ADaPT) Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Azadeh Nasseri
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies (ADaPT) Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - David G Lloyd
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies (ADaPT) Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - David J Saxby
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
- Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies (ADaPT) Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
| | - Stefanie Feih
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
- Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies (ADaPT) Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
- School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
The Surgical Management of Proximal Femoral Metastases: A Narrative Review. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 28:3748-3757. [PMID: 34677238 PMCID: PMC8534449 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28050320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
The proximal femur is a common location for the development of bony metastatic disease. Metastatic bone disease in this location can cause debilitating pain, pathologic fractures, reduced quality of life, anemia or hypercalcemia. A thorough history, physical examination and preoperative investigations are required to ensure accurate diagnosis and prognosis. The goals of surgical management is to provide pain relief and return to function with a construct that provides stability to allow for immediate weightbearing. Current surgical treatment options include intramedullary nailing, hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty and endoprosthetic reconstructions. Oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma must be given special consideration as tumor resection and reconstruction has survival benefit. Both tumor and patient characteristics must be taken into account before deciding on the appropriate surgical intervention.
Collapse
|