Effect of Psychological Care Combined with Traditional Chinese Medicine on Postoperative Psychological Stress Response in Patients with Advanced Cervical Cancer

Exploration of the Pharmacological Mechanism of Bufei Nashen Pill in Treating Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Using Network Pharmacology Integrated Molecular Docking

Objective: Based on network pharmacological analysis and molecular docking verification, the therapeutic mechanism of Bufei Nashen Pill (BFNSP) in treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is discussed. Methods: First, the active ingredients and therapeutic targets of BFNSP were determined based on literature and the Chinese medicine system pharmacology database. Relevant targets of COPD were determined using GeneCard, Therapeutic Target Database and Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM). The con-targets of BFNSP and COPD were then obtained through the Veen platform, which were implemented in Cytoscape to build “Drug-Ingredients-Potential Target network.” Target gene function enrichment analysis and signal pathway analysis were performed based on STRING database, Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery, and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes Pathway database. Finally, SYBYL 2.2.1 software was used to finish docking. Results: In the Drug-Ingredients-Potential Targets network, 172 active ingredients and 183 potential targets were found. Enrichment analysis showed that potential targets mainly involve biological functions such as inflammation, reactive oxygen, and immunity. Molecular docking showed that the active ingredients of BFNSP had preferential interaction with interleukin 6, mitogen-activated protein kinase 1, SRC, epidermal growth factor receptor, and matrix metalloproteinase-9. Conclusion: BFNSP can be used to treat COPD by the regulation of inflammation, immunity, and hypoxia tolerance.

Psychotherapy for advanced cancer patients: A meta-analysis of the quality of life and survival assessments

OBJECTIVES

A meta-analysis has explored the effect of psychotherapy on the quality of life (QOL) but has not explored the effect on advanced cancer patients' survival, which is highly debated. Therefore, we consider the survival days and QOL as the primary outcomes in our analysis.

METHODS

Eligible studies were collected from four databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) until February 20, 2021. The pooled effect sizes were presented as weighted mean difference (WMD) or relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Publication bias was evaluated by Egger's test, and I2 statistics was used to assess the heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies were finally included, containing 2,159 patients in the psychotherapy group and 2,170 patients in the control group. McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire (MQOL) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life-C15-Palliative (EORTC-QLQ-C15-Pal) supported that QOL of the psychotherapy group was significantly higher than that of the control group, and WMD value was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.12-0.71) and 17.26 (95% CI: 11.08-23.44), respectively. No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding to the survival time (WMD: 17.85, 95% CI: -8.79, 44.49, P = 0.189). Moreover, the levels of anxiety, depression, confusion, pain, and suffering were lowered in psychotherapy group (all P < 0.05).

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

Psychotherapy could improve the QOL of advanced cancer patients but not affect the survival time.