Traditional East Asian Herbal Medicine for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Scoping Review

Effectiveness of herbal medicine on patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Analysis of the PRO-ACT data using propensity score matching

BACKGROUND

Patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) have restricted pharmacotherapy options and thus resort to herbal medicines (HMs), despite limited and conflicting evidence. Therefore, use of HMs needs to be assessed in patients with ALS.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the benefits of HMs in ALS and to describe the characteristics of HM users.

STUDY DESIGN

The correlation between HMs and prognosis was determined based on data obtained from the largest ALS database with high-quality clinical trials. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to address confounding and selection bias.

METHODS

In total, 321 and 231 HM users with at least a 4-week HM prescription were identified and PS-matched with non-HM users at a 1:1 ratio based on predefined confounders. Time-to-event models with censoring at 12 or 18 months were established for survival analyses. For evaluating activity limitation and respiratory function, 320 and 376 HM users were included, respectively, and analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA).

RESULTS

The profiles of 321 HM users indicated a better condition compared with that of non-HM users before PS-matching, including higher weight (median [IQR], 77.90 [21.8] kg vs. 74.00 [21.2] kg, p < 0.01), higher body mass index (26.00 [5.4] vs. 25.20 [5.8], p < 0.01), more percentage of limb onset (261 [81.3%] vs. 2366 [67.2%], p < 0.01), and slower progression (0.47 [0.5] vs. 0.51 [0.5], p = 0.03). HM did not significantly affect survival at 12 months (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-1.03; log-rank p = 0.069), but it significantly prolonged survival at 18 months (adjusted HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56-0.98; log-rank p = 0.038). After imputation of missing data, MANOVA revealed significant effectiveness of HMs in improving activity limitation (Pillai trace, 0.0195; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

PS-based methods eliminated baseline differences between HM and non-HM users. Overall, the use of HM to treat patients with ALS is favored based on their association with prolonged overall survival within 18 months and improved activity limitation.

Herbal medicine and acupuncture relieved progressive bulbar palsy for more than 3 years: A case report

RATIONALE

Progressive bulbar palsy (PBP) is a type of motor neuron disease (MND). The main symptoms include dysarthria, dysphagia, tongue muscle atrophy and fasciculations. This disease is generally severe and develops rapidly. Due to the lack of effective treatment, many patients with MND in China turn to traditional Chinese medicine treatment for help. We successfully relieved dysphagia and sialorrhea in a patient with PBP for 3 years with herbal medicine and acupuncture.

PATIENT CONCERNS

The patient was a 68-years-old woman with PBP and suffered from severe dysphagia and sialorrhea.

DIAGNOSES

Progressive bulbar palsy.

INTERVENTIONS

Chinese herbal medicine and acupuncture.

OUTCOMES

After 4 months of herbal medicine and acupuncture treatment, dysphagia and sialorrhea were relieved considerably. The patient's condition has been stable for more than 3 years and continues to be treated with Chinese herbal medicine and acupuncture.

LESSONS

Our case suggests that alternative therapies such as herbal medicine and acupuncture may be effective in alleviating the symptoms of MND/PBP. However, standardized clinical studies are still required to verify the effectiveness and safety.

The efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicine as an add-on therapy for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) has attracted widespread attention because of its unknown pathogenesis, rapid progression, and life-threatening and incurable characteristics. A series of complementary therapies, including Chinese herbal medicine (CHM), is available for use in the clinic and has been the focus of much research. However, it is unclear as to whether supplementary CHM relieves disease symptoms or extends life span; thus, we conducted this updated meta-analysis to validate the efficacy and safety of this practice.

Methods

We searched six electronic databases for randomized controlled trials involving CHM and patients with ALS that were published up to April 2022. Two researchers independently screened the literature, assessed the risk of bias for each trial, and then extracted data. The methodological quality of the included trials was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and a pooled data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.

Results

A total of 14 trials led to the publication of 15 articles featuring 1,141 participants during the study period; the articles were included in the systematic review. In terms of increasing ALS functional rating scale (ALSFRS) scores, CHM was superior to the placebo after 3 months of treatment [mean difference (MD):0.7; 95% CI:0.43 to 0.98; P < 0.01] and to riluzole after 4 weeks of treatment (MD: 2.87; 95% CI: 0.81 to 4.93; P < 0.05), and it was superior to conventional medicine (CM) alone when used as an add-on therapy after 8 weeks of treatment (MD: 3.5; 95% CI: 0.51 to 6.49; P < 0.05). The change in the modified Norris score (m-Norris) from baseline to the end of more than 3 months of treatment was significantly different when compared between the CHM plus CM group and the CM alone group (MD: 2.09; 95% CI: 0.62 to 3.55; P < 0.01). In addition, CHM had a significantly better effect on increase in clinical effective rate (RR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.23 to 1.92; P < 0.01) and improvement in forced vital capacity (MD: 7.26; 95% CI: 2.92 to 11.6; P < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between the CHM therapy and CM in terms of improving life quality (MD: 5.13; 95% CI: -7.04 to 17.31; P = 0.41) and decreasing mortality (RR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.04 to 4.21; P = 0.46).

Conclusion

The analysis suggested that the short-term adjunct use of CHM could improve the ALSFRS score and clinical effect with a good safety profile when compared with the placebo or riluzole alone. However, future research should be centered on the long-term efficacy of patient-oriented outcomes.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=323047, identifier: CRD42022323047.