|
1
|
Zhu MR, Zhao CK, Sun YK, Li XL, Yin HH, Lu D, Ye X, Hu XY, Wang X, Xia HS, Han H, Zhou BY, Xu HX, Wang LF. Subtype prediction of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Insights Imaging 2024; 15:119. [PMID: 38755299 PMCID: PMC11098973 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01683-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The study aimed to investigate the predictive value of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) in differentiating small-duct (SD) and large-duct (LD) types of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). METHODS This study retrospectively enrolled 110 patients with pathologically confirmed ICC lesions who were subject to preoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations between January 2022 and February 2023. Patients were further classified according to the subtype: SD-type and LD-type, and an optimal predictive model was established and validated using the above pilot cohort. The test cohort, consisting of 48 patients prospectively enrolled from March 2023 to September 2023, was evaluated. RESULTS In the pilot cohort, compared with SD-type ICCs, more LD-type ICCs showed elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (p < 0.001), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (p = 0.004), ill-defined margin (p = 0.018), intrahepatic bile duct dilation (p < 0.001). Among DCE-US quantitative parameters, the wash-out area under the curve (WoAUC), wash-in and wash-out area under the curve (WiWoAUC), and fall time (FT) at the margin of lesions were higher in the SD-type group (all p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the mean transit time (mTT) and wash-out rate (WoR) at the margin of the lesion were higher in the LD-type group (p = 0.041 and 0.007, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed that intrahepatic bile duct dilation, mTT, and WoR were significant predictive factors for predicting ICC subtypes, and the AUC of the predictive model achieved 0.833 in the test cohort. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative DCE-US has the potential to become a novel complementary method for predicting the pathological subtype of ICC. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT DCE-US has the potential to assess the subtypes of ICC lesions quantitatively and preoperatively, which allows for more accurate and objective differential diagnoses, and more appropriate treatments and follow-up or additional examination strategies for the two subtypes. KEY POINTS Preoperative determination of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) subtype aids in surgical decision-making. Quantitative parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced US (DCE-US) allow for the prediction of the ICC subtype. DCE-US-based imaging has the potential to become a novel complementary method for predicting ICC subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Rui Zhu
- Department of Ultrasound, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Chong-Ke Zhao
- Department of Ultrasound, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi-Kang Sun
- Department of Ultrasound, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Long Li
- Department of Ultrasound, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Hao-Hao Yin
- Department of Ultrasound, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Dan Lu
- Department of Ultrasound, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Xin Ye
- Department of Ultrasound, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Xin-Yuan Hu
- School of Medicine, Anhui University of Science and Technology, 232000, Anhui, China
| | - Xi Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Han-Sheng Xia
- Department of Ultrasound, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Hong Han
- Department of Ultrasound, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Bo-Yang Zhou
- Department of Ultrasound, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.
| | - Hui-Xiong Xu
- Department of Ultrasound, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.
| | - Li-Fan Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Wang H, Chen J, Zhang X, Sheng X, Chang XY, Chen J, Chen MS, Dong H, Duan GJ, Hu HP, Huang ZY, Jia WD, Jiang XQ, Kuang D, Li SS, Li ZS, Lu CL, Qin SK, Qiu XS, Qu LJ, Shao CK, Shen F, Shi GM, Shi SS, Shi YJ, Sun HC, Teng XD, Wang B, Wang ZB, Wen TF, Yang JM, Yang QQ, Ye SL, Yin HF, Yuan ZG, Yun JP, Zang FL, Zhang HQ, Zhang LH, Zhao JM, Zhou J, Zhou WX, Fan J, Chen XP, Lau WY, Ji Y, Cong WM. Expert Consensus on Pathological Diagnosis of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (2022 version). J Clin Transl Hepatol 2023; 11:1553-1564. [PMID: 38161496 PMCID: PMC10752808 DOI: 10.14218/jcth.2023.00118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) can originate from the large bile duct group (segment bile ducts and area bile ducts), small bile duct group (septal bile ducts and interlobular bile ducts), and terminal bile duct group (bile ductules and canals of Hering) of the intrahepatic biliary tree, which can be histopathological corresponding to large duct type iCCA, small duct type iCCA and iCCA with ductal plate malformation pattern, and cholangiolocarcinoma, respectively. The challenge in pathological diagnosis of above subtypes of iCCA falls in the distinction of cellular morphologies, tissue structures, growth patterns, invasive behaviors, immunophenotypes, molecular mutations, and surgical prognoses. For these reasons, this expert consensus provides nine recommendations as a reference for standardizing and refining the diagnosis of pathological subtypes of iCCA, mainly based on the 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Wang
- Department of Pathology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun Chen
- Department of Pathology, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xin Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xia Sheng
- Department of Pathology, Minhang Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Yan Chang
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Min-Shan Chen
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Hui Dong
- Department of Pathology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Guang-Jie Duan
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - He-Ping Hu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Medicine, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhi-Yong Huang
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Wei-Dong Jia
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Science and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Xiao-Qing Jiang
- Department of Biliary Surgery I, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Dong Kuang
- Department of Pathology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Shan-Shan Li
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Zeng-Shan Li
- Department of Pathology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Chang-Li Lu
- Department of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Shu-Kui Qin
- Cancer Center of Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xue-Shan Qiu
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Li-Juan Qu
- Department of Pathology, The 900 Hospital of the Chinese People′s Liberation Army Joint Logistics Team, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Chun-Kui Shao
- Department of Pathology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Feng Shen
- Department of Hepatic Surgery IV, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Guo-Ming Shi
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Su-Sheng Shi
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yu-Jun Shi
- Institute of Clinical Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Hui-Chuan Sun
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Teng
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Bin Wang
- Department of Pathology, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Zhan-Bo Wang
- Department of Pathology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tian-Fu Wen
- Department of Liver Surgery & Liver Transplantation Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jia-Mei Yang
- Department of Special Medical Care, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiao-Qiao Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Sheng-Long Ye
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hong-Fang Yin
- Department of Pathology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhen-Gang Yuan
- Department of Oncology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing-Ping Yun
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Feng-Lin Zang
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Hong-Qi Zhang
- Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Li-Hong Zhang
- Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing-Min Zhao
- Department of Pathology and Hepatology, The Fifth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jian Zhou
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei-Xun Zhou
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jia Fan
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Ping Chen
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Wan Yee Lau
- Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Yuan Ji
- Department of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen-Ming Cong
- Department of Pathology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chinese Society of Liver Cancer of Chinese Anti-Cancer Association; Digestive Disease Group of Chinese Society of Pathology, Chinese Medical Association; Chinese Society of Pathology of Chinese Anti-Cancer Association; Hepatic Surgery Group of Chinese Society of Surgery, Chinese Medical Association; Biliary Tract Tumor Committee of China Anti-Cancer Association; Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology
- Department of Pathology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Pathology, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Pathology, Minhang Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary Medicine, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Science and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
- Department of Biliary Surgery I, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Pathology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
- Department of Pathology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
- Department of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Cancer Center of Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
- Department of Pathology, The 900 Hospital of the Chinese People′s Liberation Army Joint Logistics Team, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Department of Pathology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Hepatic Surgery IV, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Institute of Clinical Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Department of Pathology, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Department of Pathology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- Department of Liver Surgery & Liver Transplantation Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Department of Special Medical Care, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Pathology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing, China
- Department of Oncology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
- Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Pathology and Hepatology, The Fifth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Pu X, Qi L, Yan JW, Ai Z, Wu P, Yang F, Fu Y, Li X, Zhang M, Sun B, Yue S, Chen J. Oncogenic activation revealed by FGFR2 genetic alterations in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. Cell Biosci 2023; 13:208. [PMID: 37964396 PMCID: PMC10644541 DOI: 10.1186/s13578-023-01156-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Except for gene fusions, FGFR2 genetic alterations in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICCs) have received limited attention, leaving patients harboring activating FGFR2 gene mutations with inadequate access to targeted therapies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We sought to survey FGFR2 genetic alterations in ICC and pan-cancers using fluorescence in situ hybridization and next-generation sequencing. We conducted an analysis of the clinical and pathological features of ICCs with different FGFR2 alterations, compared FGFR2 lesion spectrum through public databases and multicenter data, and performed cellular experiments to investigate the oncogenic potential of different FGFR2 mutants. RESULTS FGFR2 gene fusions were identified in 30 out of 474 ICC samples, while five FGFR2 genetic alterations aside from fusion were present in 290 ICCs. The tumors containing FGFR2 translocations exhibited unique features, which we designated as the "FGFR2 fusion subtypes of ICC". Molecular analysis revealed that FGFR2 fusions were not mutually exclusive with other oncogenic driver genes/mutations, whereas FGFR2 in-frame deletions and site mutations often co-occurred with TP53 mutations. Multicenter and pan-cancer studies demonstrated that FGFR2 in-frame deletions were more prevalent in ICCs (0.62%) than in other cancers, and were not limited to the extracellular domain. We selected representative FGFR2 genetic alterations, including in-frame deletions, point mutations, and frameshift mutations, to analyze their oncogenic activity and responsiveness to targeted drugs. Cellular experiments revealed that different FGFR2 genetic alterations promoted ICC tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis but responded differently to FGFR-selective small molecule kinase inhibitors (SMKIs). CONCLUSIONS FGFR2 oncogenic alterations have different clinicopathological features and respond differently to SMKIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaohong Pu
- Department of Pathology, Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School,Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China
| | - Liang Qi
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jia Wu Yan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School,Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China
| | - Zihe Ai
- Department of Medical Genetics, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ping Wu
- Department of Medical Genetics, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China
| | - Fei Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School,Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yao Fu
- Department of Pathology, Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School,Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xing Li
- Shanghai Origimed Limited Company, Shanghai, 20000, China
| | - Min Zhang
- Beijing Gene Plus Limited Company, Beijing, 10000, China
| | - Beicheng Sun
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School,Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China.
| | - Shen Yue
- Department of Medical Genetics, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China.
| | - Jun Chen
- Department of Pathology, Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School,Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Dotto-Vasquez G, Villacorta-Ampuero AK, Ulloque-Badaracco JR, Hernandez-Bustamante EA, Alarcón-Braga EA, Herrera-Añazco P, Benites-Zapata VA, Hernandez AV. Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio and Clinical Outcomes in Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:2655. [PMID: 36359498 PMCID: PMC9689307 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12112655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte ratio (LMR) has shown an association with survival outcomes in several oncological diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the association between LMR and clinical outcomes for cholangiocarcinoma patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to assess the association between LMR values and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and time to recurrence (TTR) in cholangiocarcinoma patients. We used Hazard ratio (HR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) as a measure of effect for the random effect model meta-analysis. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment. The Egger test and funnel plot were developed for approaching publication bias. A total of 19 studies were included in this study (n = 3860). The meta-analysis showed that cholangiocarcinoma patients with low values of LMR were associated with worse OS (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.71-0.96; I2 = 86%) and worse TTR (HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.58-0.86; I2 = 0%). DFS and RFS also were evaluated; however, they did not show statistically significant associations. Low LMR values were associated with a worse OS and TTR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Enrique A. Hernandez-Bustamante
- Sociedad Científica de Estudiantes de Medicina de la Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Trujillo 13011, Peru
- Grupo Peruano de Investigación Epidemiológica, Unidad para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima 15012, Peru
| | - Esteban A. Alarcón-Braga
- Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima 15023, Peru
- Sociedad Científica de Estudiantes de Medicina de la Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima 15023, Peru
| | - Percy Herrera-Añazco
- Escuela de Enfermería, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Lima 15067, Peru
- Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación—IETSI, EsSalud, Lima 14072, Peru
| | - Vicente A. Benites-Zapata
- Unidad de Investigación para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima 14072, Peru
| | - Adrian V. Hernandez
- Unidad de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Meta-análisis, Guías de Práctica Clínica y Evaluaciones de Tecnología Sanitaria, Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima 15012, Peru
- Health Outcomes, Policy, and Evidence Synthesis Group, University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Mansfield, CT 06269, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Li S, Zhang X, Lou C, Gu Y, Zhao J. Preoperative peripheral blood inflammatory markers especially the fibrinogen-to-lymphocyte ratio and novel FLR-N score predict the prognosis of patients with early-stage resectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1003845. [PMID: 36387142 PMCID: PMC9659886 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1003845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Systemic inflammation is important in the development of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC). The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic power of preoperative peripheral blood inflammatory markers and the novel FLR-N score in patients with resectable ECC. Methods A total of 140 patients with resectable ECC and 140 healthy controls (HCs) were recruited for the study. The Mann−Whitney U test was used to evaluate the differences in inflammatory markers between groups. Kaplan−Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the prognostic power of preoperative fibrinogen, albumin, prealbumin, bilirubin, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, platelets, fibrinogen-to-lymphocyte ratio (FLR), fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR), fibrinogen-to-prealbumin ratio (FPR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), FLR-neutrophil (FLR-N) score, and CA19-9 in patients with resectable ECC. Nomogram was developed based on the results of multivariate Cox analyses. Results Patients with resectable ECC had significantly higher levels of neutrophils, monocytes, fibrinogen, FLR, FAR, FPR, NLR, PLR, and MLR and lower levels of lymphocytes, albumin, and prealbumin than HCs (all P < 0.01). Albumin, prealbumin, and FPR had a good ability to distinguish between ECC patients with total bilirubin < 34 µmol/L and HCs (AUCs of 0.820, 0.827, and 0.836, respectively). Kaplan−Meier analysis showed that high neutrophil, fibrinogen, FLR, FAR, PLR, MLR, and FLR-N score values were associated with poor survival in patients with resectable ECC. Multivariate analyses indicated that neutrophils (P = 0.022), FLR (P = 0.040), FLR-N score (P < 0.0001), and positive lymph node metastasis (P = 0.016) were independent factors for overall survival (OS). Nomogram were developed to predict OS for patients with ECC. Conclusion The prognostic roles of inflammatory markers in patients with resectable ECC were different. The preoperative neutrophil count, FLR and FLR-N score could serve as noninvasive markers for predicting the prognosis of resectable ECC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shijie Li
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Xingli Zhang
- Biotherapy Center, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Changjie Lou
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Yuanlong Gu
- Biotherapy Center, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Taizhou Municipal Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China
- *Correspondence: Juan Zhao, ; Yuanlong Gu,
| | - Juan Zhao
- Biotherapy Center, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
- *Correspondence: Juan Zhao, ; Yuanlong Gu,
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Liu D, Heij LR, Czigany Z, Dahl E, Dulk MD, Lang SA, Ulmer TF, Neumann UP, Bednarsch J. The prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2022; 12:12691. [PMID: 35879385 PMCID: PMC9314341 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16727-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is used as biomarker in malignant diseases showing significant association with poor oncological outcomes. The main research question of the present study was whether NLR has also prognostic value in cholangiocarcinoma patients (CCA). A systematic review was carried out to identify studies related to NLR and clinical outcomes in CCA evaluating the literature from 01/2000 to 09/2021. A random-effects model, pooled hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to investigate the statistical association between NLR and overall survival (OS) as well as disease-free survival (DFS). Subgroup analyses, evaluation of sensitivity and risk of bias were further carried out. 32 studies comprising 8572 patients were eligible for this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled outcomes revealed that high NLR prior to treatment is prognostic for poor OS (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.18–1.38, p < 0.01) and DFS (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.17–1.66, p < 0.01) with meaningful HR values. Subgroup analysis revealed that this association is not significantly affected by the treatment modality (surgical vs. non-surgical), NLR cut-off values, age and sample size of the included studies. Given the likelihood of NLR to be prognostic for reduced OS and DFS, pre-treatment NLR might serve as a useful biomarker for poor prognosis in patients with CCA and therefore facilitate clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Liu
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Lara R Heij
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.,Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Zoltan Czigany
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Edgar Dahl
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Marcel den Dulk
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sven A Lang
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Tom F Ulmer
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ulf P Neumann
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Bednarsch
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Kast RE, Alfieri A, Assi HI, Burns TC, Elyamany AM, Gonzalez-Cao M, Karpel-Massler G, Marosi C, Salacz ME, Sardi I, Van Vlierberghe P, Zaghloul MS, Halatsch ME. MDACT: A New Principle of Adjunctive Cancer Treatment Using Combinations of Multiple Repurposed Drugs, with an Example Regimen. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2563. [PMID: 35626167 PMCID: PMC9140192 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
In part one of this two-part paper, we present eight principles that we believe must be considered for more effective treatment of the currently incurable cancers. These are addressed by multidrug adjunctive cancer treatment (MDACT), which uses multiple repurposed non-oncology drugs, not primarily to kill malignant cells, but rather to reduce the malignant cells' growth drives. Previous multidrug regimens have used MDACT principles, e.g., the CUSP9v3 glioblastoma treatment. MDACT is an amalgam of (1) the principle that to be effective in stopping a chain of events leading to an undesired outcome, one must break more than one link; (2) the principle of Palmer et al. of achieving fractional cancer cell killing via multiple drugs with independent mechanisms of action; (3) the principle of shaping versus decisive operations, both being required for successful cancer treatment; (4) an idea adapted from Chow et al., of using multiple cytotoxic medicines at low doses; (5) the idea behind CUSP9v3, using many non-oncology CNS-penetrant drugs from general medical practice, repurposed to block tumor survival paths; (6) the concept from chess that every move creates weaknesses and strengths; (7) the principle of mass-by adding force to a given effort, the chances of achieving the goal increase; and (8) the principle of blocking parallel signaling pathways. Part two gives an example MDACT regimen, gMDACT, which uses six repurposed drugs-celecoxib, dapsone, disulfiram, itraconazole, pyrimethamine, and telmisartan-to interfere with growth-driving elements common to cholangiocarcinoma, colon adenocarcinoma, glioblastoma, and non-small-cell lung cancer. gMDACT is another example of-not a replacement for-previous multidrug regimens already in clinical use, such as CUSP9v3. MDACT regimens are designed as adjuvants to be used with cytotoxic drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alex Alfieri
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cantonal Hospital of Winterthur, 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland; (A.A.); (M.-E.H.)
| | - Hazem I. Assi
- Naef K. Basile Cancer Center, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1100, Lebanon;
| | - Terry C. Burns
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | - Ashraf M. Elyamany
- Oncology Unit, Hemato-Oncology Department, SECI Assiut University Egypt/King Saud Medical City, Riyadh 7790, Saudi Arabia;
| | - Maria Gonzalez-Cao
- Translational Cancer Research Unit, Dexeus University Hospital, 08028 Barcelona, Spain;
| | | | - Christine Marosi
- Clinical Division of Medical Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Michael E. Salacz
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA;
| | - Iacopo Sardi
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Meyer Children’s Hospital, Viale Pieraccini 24, 50139 Florence, Italy;
| | - Pieter Van Vlierberghe
- Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;
| | - Mohamed S. Zaghloul
- Children’s Cancer Hospital & National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo 11796, Egypt;
| | - Marc-Eric Halatsch
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cantonal Hospital of Winterthur, 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland; (A.A.); (M.-E.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
The Value of Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Prognostic Marker in Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14020438. [PMID: 35053599 PMCID: PMC8773915 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio has shown prognostic value in several malignancies; however, its role in cholangiocarcinoma remains to be determined. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the currently available literature. Overall, our analysis revealed that a high platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio before treatment is associated with an impaired long-term oncological outcome. Further, our results indicate that this assumption was not influenced by the used treatment modality (surgical vs. non-surgical), PLR cut-off values, study population age, or sample size of the included studies. Thus, an elevated pretreatment platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio has valid prognostic value for cholangiocarcinoma patients. Abstract The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), an inflammatory parameter, has shown prognostic value in several malignancies. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the impact of pretreatment PLR on the oncological outcome in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). A systematic literature search has been carried out in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases for pertinent papers published between January 2000 and August 2021. Within a random-effects model, the pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to investigate the relationships among the PLR, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were also conducted to further evaluate the relationship. A total of 20 articles comprising 5429 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, the pooled outcomes revealed that a high PLR before treatment is associated with impaired OS (HR = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.06–1.24; p < 0.01) and DFS (HR = 1.57; 95% CI = 1.19–2.07; p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis revealed that this association is not influenced by the treatment modality (surgical vs. non-surgical), PLR cut-off values, or sample size of the included studies. An elevated pretreatment PLR is prognostic for the OS and DFS of CCA patients. More high-quality studies are required to investigate the pathophysiological basis of the observation and the prognostic value of the PLR in clinical management as well as for patient selection.
Collapse
|