Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Safflower Injection in the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Hydroxysafflor Yellow A Inhibits Pyroptosis and Protecting HUVECs from OGD/R via NLRP3/Caspase-1/GSDMD Pathway

OBJECTIVE

To observe the protective effect and mechanism of hydroxyl safflower yellow A (HSYA) from myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs).

METHODS

HUVECs were treated with oxygen-glucose deprivation reperfusion (OGD/R) to simulate the ischemia reperfusion model, and cell counting kit-8 was used to detect the protective effect of different concentrations (1.25-160 µ mol/L) of HSYA on HUVECs after OGD/R. HSYA 80 µ mol/L was used for follow-up experiments. The contents of inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-18, IL-1 β, monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and IL-6 before and after administration were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The protein expressions of toll-like receptor, NOD-like receptor containing pyrin domain 3 (NLRP3), gasdermin D (GSDMD) and GSDMD-N-terminal domain (GSDMD-N) before and after administration were detected by Western blot. NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor cytokine release inhibitory drug 3 sodium salt (CRID3 sodium salt, also known as MCC950) and agonist were added, and the changes of NLRP3, cysteine-aspartic acid protease 1 (Caspase-1), GSDMD and GSDMD-N protein expressions were detected by Western blot.

RESULTS

HSYA inhibited OGD/R-induced inflammation and significantly decreased the contents of inflammatory cytokines IL-18, IL-1 β, MCP-1, TNF-α and IL-6 (P<0.01 or P<0.05). At the same time, by inhibiting NLRP3/Caspase-1/GSDMD pathway, HSYA can reduce the occurrence of pyroptosis after OGD/R and reduce the expression of NLRP3, Caspase-1, GSDMD and GSDMD-N proteins (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The protective effect of HSYA on HUVECs after OGD/R is related to down-regulating the expression of NLRP3 inflammasome and inhibiting pyroptosis.

Identification of pharmacokinetic markers for safflower injection using a combination of system pharmacology, multicomponent pharmacokinetics, and quantitative proteomics study

Safflower injection (SI), a water-extract preparation from safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.), has been widely used for the treatment of cardio-cerebrovascular diseases. This work aims to develop an approach for identifying PK markers of cardiovascular herbal medicines using SI as a case study. Firstly, qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed to reveal ingredients of the preparation via HPLC-MS. Subsequently, multiple PK ingredients and integrated PK investigations were carried out to ascertain ingredients with favorable PK properties (e.g., easily detected at conventional PK time points and high system exposure) for the whole preparation. Next, ingredients against cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in the preparation were predicted with target fishing and system pharmacology studies. Finally, ingredients with favorable PK properties, satisfactory PK representativeness for the preparation, and high relevance to CVDs were considered as potential PK markers. Their therapeutic effect was further evaluated using the H₂O₂-induced H9c2 cardiomyocyte-injured model and a proteomics study to identify objective PK markers. As results, it disclosed that SI mainly contains 11 ingredients. Among them, five ingredients, namely, hydroxysafflor yellow A (HSYA), syringin (SYR), p-coumaric acid (p-CA), scutellarin (SCU), and p-hydroxybenzaldehyde (p-HBA), showed favorable PK properties. HSYA, SYR, and rutin (RU) were predicted to show high relevance to CVDs and screened as potential PK markers. However, only HSYA and SYR were confirmed as therapeutic ingredients against CVDs. Combined with these findings, only HSYA demonstrated satisfactory representativeness on PK properties and therapeutic effects of multiple ingredients of the preparation, thereby indicating that HSYA is a potential PK marker for the SI. The results of this study can provide a reference for the characterization of PK markers for traditional Chinese medicines.

The efficacy and safety of mecobalamin combined with Chinese medicine injections in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background: In recent years, people pay more and more attention to diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). As a neurotrophic agent, mecobalamin is able to repaire nerves, which has already become a consensus among experts. However, it has been found that mecobalamin has poor effect to increase nerve conduction velocity, which is an important indicator. Clinical data have shown that Chinese medicine injection, combined with mecobalamin injection, can significantly improve nerve conduction velocity of the limbs. Nevertheless, several kinds of Chinese medicine injections have been used to treat DPN. The effect of these Chinese medicine injections for DPN are various. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of Chinese medicine injections combined with mecobalamin in the treatment of DPN.

Methods: All relevant articles published before 12 March 2022 were searched in eight electronic databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on Chinese medicine injections plus Mecobalamin for DPN were identified according to inclusion criteria, and were assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool (ROB2.0). R software and stata15 was used to create the ranking probabilities and network meta-analysis.

Results: A total of 80 RCTs involving 6,980 patients were included. The results showed that mecobalamin plus Dengzhanxixin injection (ME + DZXX) ranked first in overall response rate [RR = 1.64, 95% CI (1.26, 2.21)] and median motor nerve conduction velocity [MD = 9.46, 95% CI (5.67, 13.28)]. Then, mecobalamin plus Kudiezi Injection (ME + KDZ) had the best effect in median sensory nerve conduction velocity [MD = 10.41, 95% CI (−13.31, −7.52)], and mecobalamin plus Honghua injection (ME + HH) ranked highest in common peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity [MD = 6.8, 95% CI (4.13, 9.49)] and common peroneal sensory nerve conduction velocity [MD = −6.25, 95% CI (−8.85, −3.65)].

Conclusion: This study determined the efficacy of different Chinese medicine injections combined with mecobalamin. DZXX may be the best adjunctive Chinese medicine injection for DPN patients. However, due to potential risk of bias and limited RCTs, our results need to be treated with reservations.