Association of Early and Late Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury and Long-Term Mortality in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography

High expression of lncRNA PELATON serves as a risk factor for the incidence and prognosis of acute coronary syndrome

Atherosclerosis is the primary origin of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) diseases. Previous studies have shown that lncRNA plaque-enriched long noncoding RNA in atherosclerotic macrophage regulation (lncRNA PELATON) is a specific lncRNA in macrophage nuclei. This study aims to identify serum lncRNA PELATON as a biomarker for assessing the incidence and prognosis of ACS. Levels of serum lncRNA PELATON were detected by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) in patients with ACS and healthy individuals. The clinical significance of lncRNA PELATON in patients with ACS was assessed by analyzing receiver operating characteristic and survival curves. The serum levels of lncRNA PELATON in patients with ACS were significantly higher than those in healthy individuals. LncRNA PELATON expression was positively correlated with the expression levels of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and creatine kinase MB (CK-MB) (p < 0.05). LncRNA PELATON can be used as a potential diagnostic index with an AUC of 0.706 for unstable angina pectoris (UA), 0.782 for acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and 0.900 for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The incidence of major cardiovascular events in patients with ACS with high lncRNA PELATON expression was higher than that in those with low lncRNA PELATON expression. However, the mortality between patients in the high and low lncRNA PELATON groups was not significantly different. This study showed that higher levels of lncRNA PELATON were negatively correlated with the prognosis of ACS, revealing the potential of this measurement to serve as an index to assess the incidence and prognosis of ACS.

Ultrasonographic assessment of cardiac function and disease severity in coronary heart disease

BACKGROUND

Coronary heart disease (CHD) causes many adverse cardiovascular events and poses a threat to the patient’s health and quality of life.

AIM

To evaluate ultrasonography for evaluation of cardiac function and lesion degree in patients with CHD.

METHODS

A total of 106 patients with CHD (study group) and 106 healthy individuals (control group) in our hospital from March 2019 to September 2020 were selected for this study. All subjects were examined by ultrasound, and the mitral orifice’s early-to-late diastolic blood flow velocity ratio (E/A), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVDd), and left atrial diameter (LAD) were measured. Values were compared between the study group and healthy group, and the correlation between the ultrasonic parameters of patients with different cardiac function grades and the degree of CHD were assessed. In addition, the ultrasonic parameters of patients with different prognoses were compared after a follow-up for 6 mo.

RESULTS

E/A (1.46 ± 0.34) of the study group was smaller than that of the control group (1.88 ± 0.44), while LVDd (58.24 ± 5.05 mm) and LAD (43.31 ± 4.38 mm) were larger (48.15 ± 3.93 and 34.94 ± 2.81, respectively; P < 0.05). E/A for patients with grade III disease (1.41 ± 0.43) was smaller and their LVDd (60.04 ± 4.21 mm) and LA (44.16 ± 2.79 mm) were larger than those in patients with grade II disease (1.71 ± 0.48, 52.18 ± 3.67 mm, and 39.68 ± 2.37, respectively; P < 0.05). Patients with grade IV disease had smaller E/A (1.08 ± 0.39) and larger LVDd (66.81 ± 5.39 mm) and LAD (48.81 ± 3.95 mm) than patients with grade II and III disease (P < 0.05). In patients with moderate disease, E/A (1.44 ± 0.41) was smaller and LVDd (59.95 ± 4.14 mm) and LAD (45.15 ± 2.97 mm) were larger than in patients with mild disease (1.69 ± 0.50, 51.97 ± 3.88 and 38.81 ± 2.56 mm, respectively; P < 0.05). In patients with severe disease, E/A (1.13 ± 0.36) was smaller and LVDd (67.70 ± 6.11 mm) and LAD (49.09 ± 4.05 mm) were larger than in patients with moderate disease (P < 0.05). E/A was negatively correlated with cardiac function classification and disease severity, while LVDd and LAD were positively correlated with cardiac function classification and disease severity (P < 0.05). E/A (1.83 ± 0.51) for patients with good prognosis was higher than that for those with poor prognosis (1.39 ± 0.32), while LVDd (49.60 ± 4.39 mm) and LAD (36.13 ± 3.05 mm) were lower (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The ultrasonic parameters of patients with CHD are abnormal, and differ significantly in patients with different cardiac function grades, lesion degree, and prognosis.