Renal Vascular Response to Angiotensin II Administration in Two Kidneys-One Clip Hypertensive Rats Treated with High Dose of Estradiol: The Role of Mas Receptor

Age- and Gender-Related Differences in Renal Vascular Responses to Angiotensin II in Rats: The Role of the Mas Receptor

Background

Renal hemodynamic is influenced by both gender difference and age. Also, the Mas receptor (MasR) as one of the depressor components of the renin-angiotensin system which has more expression in females could postpone some dysfunctions associated with age, although the association between MasR and age in renal vascular responses to angiotensin II (Ang II) in male and female rats was well undefined. Therefore, the current study examined the effects of age and sex on systemic and renal vascular responses to graded doses of Ang II in Wistar rats with or without MasR antagonists (A779).

Materials and Methods

Anesthetized Wistar male and female rats with two age ranges of 8-12 and 24-28 weeks were exposed to cannulate venous and arterial vessels. After stability, mean arterial pressure (MAP), renal perfusion pressure (RPP), renal vascular resistance (RVR), and renal blood flow (RBF) were measured in response to the infusion of Ang II with or without A779.

Results

There were no significant differences in the base values of MAP, RPP, RBF, and RVR between the two genders in both the age ranges of 8-12 and 24-28 weeks. In addition, no significant gender difference was observed in the age ranges of the above mentioned parameters among the groups receiving vehicle or A779. Also, the infusion of vehicle or A779 could not significantly change the base values. On the other hand, the responses of RBF and RVR to Ang II revealed gender differences among 8-12-week groups (P < 0.05) but not in 24-28-week groups, while the blockade of MasR could not influence the responses in the age ranges.

Conclusion

It was concluded that age could impress sex difference in RBF and RVR responses to Ang II infusion and that MasR alone could not participate in these responses. In other words, MasR is not active under normal and acutely elevated Ang II levels.

Hibiscus attenuates renovascular hypertension-induced aortic remodeling dose dependently: the oxidative stress role and Ang II/cyclophilin A/ERK1/2 signaling

Introduction: The high levels of angiotensin II (Ang II) can modify the vascular tone, enhance vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) proliferation and hypertrophy and increase the inflammatory cellular infiltration into the vessel wall. The old herbal nonpharmacological agent, Hibiscus (HS) sabdariffa L has multiple cardioprotective impacts; thus, we investigated the role of HS extract in amelioration of renovascular hypertension (RVH)-induced aortic remodeling. Materials and methods: Thirty-five rats (7/group) were randomly allocated into 5 groups; group: I: Control-sham group, and RVH groups; II, III, IV, and V. The rats in RVH groups were subjected to the modified Goldblatt two-kidneys, one clip (2K1C) for induction of hypertension. In group: II, the rats were left untreated whereas in group III, IV, and V: RVH-rats were treated for 6 weeks with low dose hibiscus (LDH), medium dose hibiscus (MDH), and high dose hibiscus (HDH) respectively. Results: We found that the augmented pro-contractile response of the aortic rings was ameliorated secondary to the in-vivo treatment with HS dose dependently. The cyclophilin A (CyPA) protein levels positively correlated with the vascular adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and ERK1/2, which, in turn, contribute to the reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Daily HS intake modified aortic renovation by enhancing the antioxidant capacity, restraining hypertrophy and fibrosis, downregulation of the metastasis associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript (MALAT1), and cyclophilin A (CyPA)/ERK1/2 levels. Discussion: Adding to the multiple beneficial effects, HS aqueous extract was able to inhibit vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation induced by 2K1C model. Thus, adding more privilege for the utilization of the traditional herbal extracts to attenuate RVH-induced aortopathy.

A review on experimental surgical models and anesthetic protocols of heart failure in rats

Heart failure (HF) is a serious health and economic burden worldwide, and its prevalence is continuously increasing. Current medications effectively moderate the progression of symptoms, and there is a need for novel preventative and reparative treatments. The development of novel HF treatments requires the testing of potential therapeutic procedures in appropriate animal models of HF. During the past decades, murine models have been extensively used in fundamental and translational research studies to better understand the pathophysiological mechanisms of HF and develop more effective methods to prevent and control congestive HF. Proper surgical approaches and anesthetic protocols are the first steps in creating these models, and each successful approach requires a proper anesthetic protocol that maintains good recovery and high survival rates after surgery. However, each protocol may have shortcomings that limit the study's outcomes. In addition, the ethical regulations of animal welfare in certain countries prohibit the use of specific anesthetic agents, which are widely used to establish animal models. This review summarizes the most common and recent surgical models of HF and the anesthetic protocols used in rat models. We will highlight the surgical approach of each model, the use of anesthesia, and the limitations of the model in the study of the pathophysiology and therapeutic basis of common cardiovascular diseases.

Sex Difference in MasR Expression and Functions in the Renal System

Renin-angiotensin system (RAS), as a critical system for controlling body fluid and hemostasis, contains peptides and receptors, including angiotensin 1-7 (Ang 1-7) and Mas receptor (MasR). Ang 1-7 implements its function via MasR. Ang II is another peptide in RAS that performs its actions via two Ang II type 1 and 2 receptors (AT1R and AT2R). The functions of AT2R and MasR are very similar, and both have a vasodilation effect, while AT1R has a vasoconstriction role. MasR affects many mechanisms in the brain, heart, blood vessels, kidney, lung, endocrine, reproductive, skeletal muscle, and liver and probably acts like a paracrine hormone in these organs. The effect of Ang 1-7 in the kidney is complex according to the hydroelectrolyte status, the renal sympathetic nervous system, and the activity level of the RAS. The MasR expression and function seem more complex than Ang II receptors and have interacted with Ang II receptors and many other factors, including sex hormones. Also, pathological conditions including hypertension, diabetes, and ischemia-reperfusion could change MasR expression and function. In this review, we consider the role of sex differences in MasR expression and functions in the renal system under physiological and pathological conditions.

Estradiol Supplement or Induced Hypertension May Attenuate the Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antagonist-Promoted Renal Blood Flow Response to Graded Angiotensin II Administration in Ovariectomized Rats

Backgrounds. Estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) and hypertension may influence females’ renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and its components. The angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 receptor (AT1R) antagonist (losartan) may promote renal blood flow (RBF), and it is widely used in the clinic to control hypertension. The main objective of this study was the effects of estradiol or induced hypertension on RBF response to Ang II in losartan-treated ovariectomized (OVX) rats. Methods. Two groups of OVX rats were treated with placebo (group 1) and estradiol (group 2) for period of four weeks, and another group of OVX rats was subjected to induce hypertension by two-kidney one clip (2K1C) model (group 3). All the groups were subjected to the surgical procedure under anesthesia, and AT1R was blocked by losartan. RBF and renal vascular resistance (RVR) responses to Ang II administration were determined and compared. Results. Mean arterial (MAP) and renal perfusion (RPP) pressures in group 3 and uterus weight (UT) in group 2 were significantly more than other groups ( $P<0.05$ ). Ang II infusion resulted in dose-related percentage change increase in RBF and decrease in RVR. However, these responses in the OVX-estradiol and OVX-hypertensive rats were significantly lower than in the OVX-control group ( $P<0.05$ ). For instance, at the dose of 1000 ng/kg/min of Ang II administration, the percentage change of RBF was $45.1\pm 10.4\%$ , $17.9\pm 2.3\%$ , and $16.7\pm 4.7\%$ in the groups of 1 to 3, respectively. Conclusion. Losartan prescription in some conditions such as hypertension or ERT could worsen RBF and RVR responses to Ang II.