Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block Combined with Propofol Deep Sedation versus Spinal Anesthesia for Hemorrhoidectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study

The impact of combined administration of ropivacaine and dexamethasone on postoperative analgesia in perianal surgery with pudendal nerve block under ultrasound guidance: a prospective randomized controlled study

Background

In recent years, severe pain after perianal surgery has seriously affected the prognosis of hospitalized patients. How to maximize the improvement of postoperative pain and perioperative comfort becomes particularly important.

Methods

This study was a double-blind randomized controlled trial (Registration No.: ChiCTR2100048760, Registration Date: 16 July 2021, Link: www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=130226), and patients were randomly divided into two groups: one group underwent postoperative 20 mL bilateral pudendal nerve block with 0.5% ropivacaine (P group), and the other group underwent postoperative 20 mL bilateral pudendal nerve block with 0.5% ropivacaine + 8 mg dexamethasone (PD group). The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate to severe pain at the first postoperative dressing change. Secondary outcomes included Quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at 3 days after surgery, sleep quality, pain score at 3 days after surgery, and incidence of adverse events.

Results

In the main outcome indicators, the incidence was 41.7% in the P group and 24.2% in the PD group (p = 0.01). The QoR-15 score and sleep quality in PD group were better than those in P group 2 days before surgery. The incidence of postoperative urinary retention was significantly decreased in PD group (p = 0.01).

Conclusion

Local anesthesia with dexamethasone combined with pudendal nerve block after perianal surgery can reduce the incidence of moderate to severe pain during the first dressing change. This may be one of the approaches to multimodal analgesia after perianal surgery.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR2100048760.

Comparison between the Efficacy of Sacral Erector Spina Plane Block and Pudendal Block on Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort: A Prospective Randomized Study

Objective: Catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) due to indwelling urinary catheterization in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is difficult to tolerate and needs to be treated. This randomized prospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of sacral erector spinae plane block (SESPB) and pudendal nerve block (PNB) in reducing the incidence and score of CRBD. Methods: This study was conducted between November and December 2023. ASA I-III, fifty-four TURP patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 received SESPB (n = 27) and Group 2 received PNB (n = 27) under ultrasound guidance at the end of surgery. The incidence of CRBD, CRBD score, numerical rating scale (NRS) score, use of rescue analgesics, block performance time, first call for analgesics, patient satisfaction, and side effects were recorded for 24 h. Results: The incidence of CRBD was lowest at 33.3% and highest at 48.1% in Group 1 and lowest at 25.9% and highest at 48.1% in Group 2, with no significant difference between the groups at all measurement times. CRBD scores and NRS scores were low and similar between the two groups. Block performance times were 9 ± 1.7 min in SESPB and 20 ± 2.5 min in PNB, and there was a significant difference between the mean times (p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was adequate and similar in both groups. Conclusions: SESPB demonstrated a similar decreasing effect to PNB on the incidence and scores of CRBD in the first 24 h following TURP operations. The duration of SESPB administration was shorter than PNB.

The role of pudendal nerve block in hemorrhoid surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind randomized controlled trials

Background

Pudendal nerve block (PNB) is a commonly used anesthesia method that has been widely used in postoperative analgesia for hemorrhoids in recent years. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to analyze the effectiveness of PNB in postoperative analgesia for hemorrhoids.

Methods

Relevant data and studies published from inception until August 14, 2023, were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to evaluate the beneficial effects of PNB for analgesia following hemorrhoidectomy.

Results

This meta-analysis included 6 double-blind RCTs comprising 501 patients. We evaluated the function of PNB in improving outcomes of postoperative analgesia of hemorrhoids. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores on postoperative within 6 h (MD, -3.04; 95% CI, -4.13 to -1.95; P < 0.0001), 12 h (MD, -3.14; 95% CI, -3.87 to -2.40; P < 0.0001), and 24 h (MD, -2.25; 95% CI, -2.95 to -1.55; P < 0.0001) were enhanced by the application of PNB, but not in 48 h (MD, -2.54; 95% CI, -5.29 to 0.20; P = 0.07).

Conclusion

Pudendal nerve block (PNB) could effectively relieve postoperative pain of hemorrhoids. However, our results still need to be confirmed by multi-center clinical studies.

Impact of Intraspinal Nerve Block Anesthesia on Intrapartum Fever and the Neonate

Objective

To evaluate the impact of intraspinal nerve block anesthesia on intrapartum fever and the neonate.

Methods

In this prospective study, between October 2019 and December 2020, 90 eligible primiparous women enrolled in the obstetrics and gynecology department of our hospital for delivery were recruited and assigned via the random number table method at a ratio of 1 : 1 to either an analgesic group given intraspinal nerve block anesthesia for labor or a nonanalgesic group without anesthesia for labor. Outcome measures included intrapartum body temperature, cases of intrapartum fever, Apgar scores of neonates, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, delivery mode, and indomethacin use.

Results

Intraspinal nerve block anesthesia was associated with a higher body temperature at 4 h and 5 h after analgesia and more cases of intrapartum fever versus no anesthesia (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the Apgar scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). Participants given intraspinal nerve block anesthesia had lower VAS scores during labor versus those without anesthesia (P < 0.05). The differences in the delivery mode between the two groups were not significant (P > 0.05). Intraspinal nerve block anesthesia resulted in a significantly higher demand for indomethacin versus no anesthesia (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Intraspinal nerve block anesthesia is clinically effective in labor analgesia but may cause increased body temperature or even overt clinical fever, so close clinical observation of maternal temperature changes is required to mitigate the effects of anesthesia on the mothers. No adverse consequences of intraspinal nerve block anesthesia on the newborns were reported in this study.