An Objective Pain Score for Chronic Pain Clinic Patients

Skeletal Traction for Isolated Femur Fractures Does Not Reduce Opioid Consumption

OBJECTIVES

Isolated femoral shaft fractures can be treated preoperatively with skeletal traction (TXN) or maintenance of a position of comfort (COMF). The goal of this retrospective review was to determine whether preoperative opioid consumption differs significantly between these forms of treatment.

METHODS

DESIGN

Case-control retrospective study.

SETTING

Two academic Level 1 trauma centers.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients presenting to the emergency department with isolated OTA/AO 32A-C femoral shaft fractures from 2017 to 2020.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

The primary outcome was preoperative opioid consumption (morphine milligram equivalents) comparing patients treated with application of TXN or placed in a position of COMF.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty patients were studied (COMF n = 167, TXN n = 53). Multivariate regression analysis revealed significantly greater preoperative opioid consumption in the emergency department for the TXN group compared with COMF (2.6 more morphine milligram equivalents [confidence interval, 0.23-4.96], P = 0.031). There was no difference in preoperative opioid consumption between groups on the hospital floor ( P = 0.811) nor during the entire preoperative course ( P = 0.486). The total preoperative rate of opioid consumption (morphine milligram equivalents/hour) did not differ ( P = 0.825).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with isolated femoral shaft fractures treated preoperatively with skeletal traction consumed more opioids in the emergency department compared with patients treated in a position of comfort, but no difference in opioid consumption was observed between groups for the entire preoperative course. A position of comfort may be considered as an acceptable alternative to skeletal traction for patients with isolated femur fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Intradermal and Intramuscular Bupivacaine Reduces Opioid Use Following Noninstrumented Spine Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative bupivacaine hydrochloride wound infiltration as an adjunct means of pain relief following noninstrumented posterior spine surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed of all patients who underwent posterior spinal decompression surgery at the University of California, San Diego, and at the San Diego VA Medical Center between June 2020 and July 2021, following a change in practice to including bupivacaine infiltration at the end of the surgery. Patients were stratified into groups based on whether they received intrawound bupivacaine during surgery. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from the electronic health record. Postoperative opioid use, visual analog pain scores, heart rate, and blood pressure were compared.

RESULTS

The analysis included 43 patients; 21 received bupivacaine infiltration, and 22 did not. No complications were encountered in the perioperative period. Patients who received bupivacaine consumed significantly less opioids over the 72 hours following surgery, had slightly lower pain scores, and experienced slightly lower heart rates. No significant difference was found between groups with respect to systolic blood pressure, operative time, or length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative infiltration of the exposed paraspinous musculature and peri-incisional subdermal layer with bupivacaine significantly reduced postoperative opioid consumption for 72 hours after surgery and slightly reduced pain ratings and conferred superior heart rate control. This low-cost intervention produced significant patient benefit with minimal risk and no significant increase in surgical time or hospital stay.

Exhaled-Breath Testing Using an Electronic Nose during Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: An Experimental Pilot Study

The increased awareness of discrepancies between self-reporting outcome measurements and objective outcome measurements within the field of neuromodulation has accelerated the search towards more objective measurements. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether an electronic nose can differentiate between chronic pain patients in whom Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) was activated versus deactivated. Twenty-seven patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) participated in this prospective pilot study. Volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath were measured with electronic nose technology (Aeonose™) during SCS on and off states. Random forest was used with a leave-10%-out cross-validation method to determine accuracy of discriminating between SCS on and off states. Our random forest showed an accuracy of 0.56, with an area under the curve of 0.62, a sensitivity of 62% (95% CI: 41–79%) and a specificity of 50% (95% CI: 30–70%). Pain intensity scores were significantly different between both SCS states. Our findings indicate that we cannot discriminate between SCS off and on states based on exhaled breath with the Aeonose™ in patients with FBSS. In clinical practice, these findings imply that with a noninvasive electronic nose, exhaled breath cannot be used as an additional marker of the effect of neuromodulation.