Predicting the Grade of Prostate Cancer Based on a Biparametric MRI Radiomics Signature

Radiomic Pipelines for Prostate Cancer in External Beam Radiation Therapy: A Review of Methods and Future Directions

Background: Prostate Cancer (PCa) is asymptomatic at an early stage and often painless, requiring only active surveillance. External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) is currently a curative option for localised and locally advanced diseases and a palliative option for metastatic low-volume disease. Although highly effective, especially in a hypofractionation scheme, 17.4% to 39.4% of all patients suffer from cancer recurrence after EBRT. But, radiographic findings also correlate with significant differences in protein expression patterns. In the PCa EBRT workflow, several imaging modalities are available for grading, staging and contouring. Using image data characterisation algorithms (radiomics), one can provide a quantitative analysis of prognostic and predictive treatment outcomes. Methods: This literature review searched for original studies in radiomics for PCa in the context of EBRT. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this review includes 73 new studies and analyses datasets, imaging modality, segmentation technique, feature extraction, selection and model building methods. Results: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the preferred imaging modality for radiomic studies in PCa but Computed Tomography (CT), Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Ultrasound (US) may offer valuable insights on tumour characterisation and treatment response prediction. Conclusions: Most radiomic studies used small, homogeneous and private datasets lacking external validation and variability. Future research should focus on collaborative efforts to create large, multicentric datasets and develop standardised methodologies, ensuring the full potential of radiomics in clinical practice.

Can we predict pathology without surgery? Weighing the added value of multiparametric MRI and whole prostate radiomics in integrative machine learning models

OBJECTIVE

To test the ability of high-performance machine learning (ML) models employing clinical, radiological, and radiomic variables to improve non-invasive prediction of the pathological status of prostate cancer (PCa) in a large, single-institution cohort.

METHODS

Patients who underwent multiparametric MRI and prostatectomy in our institution in 2015-2018 were considered; a total of 949 patients were included. Gradient-boosted decision tree models were separately trained using clinical features alone and in combination with radiological reporting and/or prostate radiomic features to predict pathological T, pathological N, ISUP score, and their change from preclinical assessment. Model behavior was analyzed in terms of performance, feature importance, Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) values, and mean absolute error (MAE). The best model was compared against a naïve model mimicking clinical workflow.

RESULTS

The model including all variables was the best performing (AUC values ranging from 0.73 to 0.96 for the six endpoints). Radiomic features brought a small yet measurable boost in performance, with the SHAP values indicating that their contribution can be critical to successful prediction of endpoints for individual patients. MAEs were lower for low-risk patients, suggesting that the models find them easier to classify. The best model outperformed (p ≤ 0.0001) clinical baseline, resulting in significantly fewer false negative predictions and overall was less prone to under-staging.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results highlight the potential benefit of integrative ML models for pathological status prediction in PCa. Additional studies regarding clinical integration of such models can provide valuable information for personalizing therapy offering a tool to improve non-invasive prediction of pathological status.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The best machine learning model was less prone to under-staging of the disease. The improved accuracy of our pathological prediction models could constitute an asset to the clinical workflow by providing clinicians with accurate pathological predictions prior to treatment.

KEY POINTS

• Currently, the most common strategies for pre-surgical stratification of prostate cancer (PCa) patients have shown to have suboptimal performances. • The addition of radiological features to the clinical features gave a considerable boost in model performance. Our best model outperforms the naïve model, avoiding under-staging and resulting in a critical advantage in the clinic. •Machine learning models incorporating clinical, radiological, and radiomics features significantly improved accuracy of pathological prediction in prostate cancer, possibly constituting an asset to the clinical workflow.

AI-powered radiomics: revolutionizing detection of urologic malignancies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to highlight the integration of artificial intelligence-powered radiomics in urologic oncology, focusing on the diagnostic and prognostic advancements in the realm of managing prostate, kidney, and bladder cancers.

RECENT FINDINGS

As artificial intelligence continues to shape the medical imaging landscape, its integration into the field of urologic oncology has led to impressive results. For prostate cancer diagnostics, machine learning has shown promise in refining clinically-significant lesion detection, with some success in deciphering ambiguous lesions on multiparametric MRI. For kidney cancer, radiomics has emerged as a valuable tool for better distinguishing between benign and malignant renal masses and predicting tumor behavior from CT or MRI scans. Meanwhile, in the arena of bladder cancer, there is a burgeoning emphasis on prediction of muscle invasive cancer and forecasting disease trajectory. However, many studies showing promise in these areas face challenges due to limited sample sizes and the need for broader external validation.

SUMMARY

Radiomics integrated with artificial intelligence offers a pioneering approach to urologic oncology, ushering in an era of enhanced diagnostic precision and reduced invasiveness, guiding patient-tailored treatment plans. Researchers must embrace broader, multicentered endeavors to harness the full potential of this field.

Exploring the efficacy of multi-flavored feature extraction with radiomics and deep features for prostate cancer grading on mpMRI

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of radiomics and deep features obtained from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for grading prostate cancer. We propose a novel approach called multi-flavored feature extraction or tensor, which combines four mpMRI images using eight different fusion techniques to create 52 images or datasets for each patient. We evaluate the effectiveness of this approach in grading prostate cancer and compare it to traditional methods.

METHODS

We used the PROSTATEx-2 dataset consisting of 111 patients' images from T2W-transverse, T2W-sagittal, DWI, and ADC images. We used eight fusion techniques to merge T2W, DWI, and ADC images, namely Laplacian Pyramid, Ratio of the low-pass pyramid, Discrete Wavelet Transform, Dual-Tree Complex Wavelet Transform, Curvelet Transform, Wavelet Fusion, Weighted Fusion, and Principal Component Analysis. Prostate cancer images were manually segmented, and radiomics features were extracted using the Pyradiomics library in Python. We also used an Autoencoder for deep feature extraction. We used five different feature sets to train the classifiers: all radiomics features, all deep features, radiomics features linked with PCA, deep features linked with PCA, and a combination of radiomics and deep features. We processed the data, including balancing, standardization, PCA, correlation, and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. Finally, we used nine classifiers to classify different Gleason grades.

RESULTS

Our results show that the SVM classifier with deep features linked with PCA achieved the most promising results, with an AUC of 0.94 and a balanced accuracy of 0.79. Logistic regression performed best when using only the deep features, with an AUC of 0.93 and balanced accuracy of 0.76. Gaussian Naive Bayes had lower performance compared to other classifiers, while KNN achieved high performance using deep features linked with PCA. Random Forest performed well with the combination of deep features and radiomics features, achieving an AUC of 0.94 and balanced accuracy of 0.76. The Voting classifiers showed higher performance when using only the deep features, with Voting 2 achieving the highest performance, with an AUC of 0.95 and balanced accuracy of 0.78.

CONCLUSION

Our study concludes that the proposed multi-flavored feature extraction or tensor approach using radiomics and deep features can be an effective method for grading prostate cancer. Our findings suggest that deep features may be more effective than radiomics features alone in accurately classifying prostate cancer.

Morphometry-based radiomics for predicting therapeutic response in patients with gliomas following radiotherapy

Introduction

Gliomas are still considered as challenging in oncologic management despite the developments in treatment approaches. The complete elimination of a glioma might not be possible even after a treatment and assessment of therapeutic response is important to determine the future course of actions for patients with such cancers. In the recent years radiomics has emerged as a promising solution with potential applications including prediction of therapeutic response. Hence, this study was focused on investigating whether morphometry-based radiomics signature could be used to predict therapeutic response in patients with gliomas following radiotherapy.

Methods

105 magnetic resonance (MR) images including segmented and non-segmented images were used to extract morphometric features and develop a morphometry-based radiomics signature. After determining the appropriate machine learning algorithm, a prediction model was developed to predict the therapeutic response eliminating the highly correlated features as well as without eliminating the highly correlated features. Then the model performance was evaluated.

Results

Tumor grade had the highest contribution to develop the morphometry-based signature. Random forest provided the highest accuracy to train the prediction model derived from the morphometry-based radiomics signature. An accuracy of 86% and area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.91 were achieved for the prediction model evaluated without eliminating the highly correlated features whereas accuracy and AUC value were 84% and 0.92 respectively for the prediction model evaluated after eliminating the highly correlated features.

Discussion

Nonetheless, the developed morphometry-based radiomics signature could be utilized as a noninvasive biomarker for therapeutic response in patients with gliomas following radiotherapy.

Advancements in MRI-Based Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Review and Future Prospects

The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has become a common technique used in guiding biopsy and developing treatment plans for prostate lesions. While this technique is effective, non-invasive methods such as radiomics have gained popularity for extracting imaging features to develop predictive models for clinical tasks. The aim is to minimize invasive processes for improved management of prostate cancer (PCa). This study reviews recent research progress in MRI-based radiomics for PCa, including the radiomics pipeline and potential factors affecting personalized diagnosis. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) with medical imaging is also discussed, in line with the development trend of radiogenomics and multi-omics. The survey highlights the need for more data from multiple institutions to avoid bias and generalize the predictive model. The AI-based radiomics model is considered a promising clinical tool with good prospects for application.

Radiomics vs radiologist in prostate cancer. Results from a systematic review

PURPOSE

Radiomics in uro-oncology is a rapidly evolving science proving to be a novel approach for optimizing the analysis of massive data from medical images to provide auxiliary guidance in clinical issues. This scoping review aimed to identify key aspects wherein radiomics can potentially improve the accuracy of diagnosis, staging, and extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

The literature search was performed on June 2022 using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Controlled Register of Trials. Studies were included if radiomics were compared with radiological reports only.

RESULTS

Seventeen papers were included. The combination of PIRADS and radiomics score models improves the PIRADS score reporting of 2 and 3 lesions even in the peripheral zone. Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics models suggest that by simply omitting diffusion contrast enhancement imaging in radiomics models can simplify the process of analysis of clinically significant PCa by PIRADS. Radiomics features correlated with the Gleason grade with excellent discriminative ability. Radiomics has higher accuracy in predicting not only the presence but also the side of extraprostatic extension.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomics research on PCa mainly uses MRI as an imaging modality and is focused on diagnosis and risk stratification and has the best future possibility of improving PIRADS reporting. Radiomics has established its superiority over radiologist-reported outcomes but the variability has to be taken into consideration before translating it to clinical practice.

A radiomics model based on aortic computed tomography angiography: the impact on predicting the prognosis of patients with aortic intramural hematoma (IMH)

Background

The prognosis of aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) is unpredictable, but computed tomography angiography (CTA) plays an important role of high diagnostic performance in the initial diagnosis and during follow-up of patients. In this study, we investigated the value of a radiomics model based on aortic CTA for predicting the prognosis of patients with medically treated IMH.

Method

A total of 120 patients with IMH were enrolled in this study. The follow-up duration ranged from 32 to 1,346 days (median 232 days). Progression of these patients was classified as follows: destabilization, which refers to deterioration in the aortic condition, including significant increases in the thickness of the IMH, the progression of IMH to a penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU), aortic dissection (AD), or rupture; or stabilization, which refers to an unchanged appearance or a decrease in the size or disappearance of the IMH. The patients were divided into a training cohort (n=84) and a validation cohort (n=36). Six different machine learning classifiers were applied: random forest (RF), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), Gaussian Naive Bayes, decision tree, logistic regression, and support vector machine (SVM). The clinical-radiomics combined nomogram model was established by multivariate logistic regression. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was implemented to evaluate the discrimination performance of the models. The calibration curves and Hosmer-Lemeshow test were used for evaluating model calibration. DeLong's test was performed to compare the AUC performance of models.

Results

Among all of the patients, 60 patients showed destabilization and 60 patients remained stable. A total of 12 radiomic features were retained after application of the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). These features were used for the machine learning model construction. The SVM-radial basis function (SVM-RBF) model obtained the best performance with an AUC of 0.765 (95% CI, 0.593-0.906). In the validation cohort, the combined clinical-radiomics model [AUC =0.787; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.619-0.923] showed a significantly higher performance than did the clinical model (AUC =0.596; 95% CI, 0.413-0.796; P=0.021) and had a similar performance to the radiomics model (AUC =0.765; 95% CI, 0.589-0.906; P=0.672).

Conclusions

A quantitative nomogram based on radiomic features of CTA images can be used to predict disease progression in patients with IMH and may help improve clinical decision-making.

Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer with a multimodal MRI-based radiomics nomogram

Objective

To develop and validate a multimodal MRI-based radiomics nomogram for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer (CS-PCa).

Methods

Patients who underwent radical prostatectomy with pre-biopsy prostate MRI in three different centers were assessed retrospectively. Totally 141 and 60 cases were included in the training and test sets in cohort 1, respectively. Then, 66 and 122 cases were enrolled in cohorts 2 and 3, as external validation sets 1 and 2, respectively. Two different manual segmentation methods were established, including lesion segmentation and whole prostate segmentation on T2WI and DWI scans, respectively. Radiomics features were obtained from the different segmentation methods and selected to construct a radiomics signature. The final nomogram was employed for assessing CS-PCa, combining radiomics signature and PI-RADS. Diagnostic performance was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, net reclassification improvement (NRI) and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

Ten features associated with CS-PCa were selected from the model integrating whole prostate (T2WI) + lesion (DWI) for radiomics signature development. The nomogram that combined the radiomics signature with PI-RADS outperformed the subjective evaluation alone according to ROC analysis in all datasets (all p<0.05). NRI and DCA confirmed that the developed nomogram had an improved performance in predicting CS-PCa.

Conclusions

The established nomogram combining a biparametric MRI-based radiomics signature and PI-RADS could be utilized for noninvasive and accurate prediction of CS-PCa.

Evaluation of the Efficiency of MRI-Based Radiomics Classifiers in the Diagnosis of Prostate Lesions

Objective

To compare the performance of different imaging classifiers in the prospective diagnosis of prostate diseases based on multiparameter MRI.

Methods

A total of 238 patients with pathological outcomes were enrolled from September 2019 to July 2021, including 142 in the training set and 96 in the test set. After the regions of interest were manually segmented, decision tree (DT), Gaussian naive Bayes (GNB), XGBoost, logistic regression, random forest (RF) and support vector machine classifier (SVC) models were established on the training set and tested on the independent test set. The prospective diagnostic performance of each classifier was compared by using the AUC, F1-score and Brier score.

Results

In the patient-based data set, the top three classifiers of combined sequences in terms of the AUC were logistic regression (0.865), RF (0.862), and DT (0.852); RF “was significantly different from the other two classifiers (P =0.022, P =0.005), while logistic regression and DT had no statistical significance (P =0.802). In the lesions-based data set, the top three classifiers of combined sequences in terms of the AUC were RF (0.931), logistic regression (0.922) and GNB (0.922). These three classifiers were significantly different from.

Conclusion

The results of this experiment show that radiomics has a high diagnostic efficiency for prostate lesions. The RF classifier generally performed better overall than the other classifiers in the experiment. The XGBoost and logistic regression models also had high classification value in the lesions-based data set.