Outcome of Root Canal Treatment of Necrotic Teeth with Apical Periodontitis Filled with a Bioceramic-Based Sealer

Root canal therapy combined with endoscopic sinus surgery for odontogenic sinusitis: Efficacy comparison in a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Odontogenic maxillary sinusitis, often triggered by dental issues like periapical periodontitis, significantly contributes to chronic sinusitis, mainly affecting adults around 50 years old, emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary diagnostic and treatment approach.

AIM

To investigate the therapeutic effect and clinical value of root canal therapy combined with nasal endoscopic surgery compared with simple root canal therapy in the treatment of severe odontogenic maxillary sinusitis caused by periapical periodontitis.

METHODS

The clinical data, diagnosis, and treatment of 200 patients with severe odontogenic maxillary sinusitis caused by periapical periodontitis from October 2020 to October 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, 63 patients were treated with simple root canal therapy as the control group, and 137 patients were treated with root canal therapy combined with nasal endoscopic surgery as the observation group. The therapeutic effect, Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score, paranasal sinus Lund-Mackay score, complication rate, recurrence rate, and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

First, we compared the effective rates: 23 cases were cured, 22 were improved, and 8 were ineffective in the control group, yielding a total effective rate of 84.90%. Meanwhile, 97 cases were cured, 34 improved, and 6 were ineffective in the observation group, resulting in a total effective rate of 95.62%. The observation group had a higher total effective rate compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Second, we compared the Lund–Kennedy endoscopic score. Before treatment, no significant difference (P > 0.05) was observed in this score between the two groups. After treatment, the Lund–Kennedy endoscopic score decreased in both groups. The Lund–Kennedy endoscopic score of the observation group at 3 and 6 mo after treatment was lower compared to that of the control group (P < 0.05). Third, we compared the Lund–Mackay score of paranasal sinuses. Before treatment, there was no significant difference in this score between the two groups (P > 0.05). After treatment, the Lund–Mackay scores of paranasal sinuses decreased in both groups. The Lund–Mackay scores of paranasal sinuses in the observation group at 3 and 6 mo after treatment were lower compared to those of the control group (P < 0.05). Fourth, we compared the incidence and recurrence rate of complications. Three months after treatment, no significant difference was found in the incidence and recurrence rate of complications between the observation group (6.56%) and the control group (9.52%) (P > 0.05). However, 6 mo after treatment, the incidence and recurrence rate of complications in the observation group (2.91%) was significantly higher compared to that of the control group (12.69%) (P < 0.05). Fifth, we compared patient satisfaction. Six months after treatment, the patient satisfaction of the observation group (93.43%) was significantly better than that of the control group (84.12%) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Root canal therapy combined with nasal endoscopic surgery has a good therapeutic effect on severe odontogenic maxillary sinusitis caused by periapical periodontitis, and it can reduce the injury of maxillary sinus mucosa and bone, and significantly reduce the incidence of complications and recurrence rate. Meanwhile, it has high patient satisfaction and remarkable therapeutic effect, which is suggested to be popularized and applied in clinic.

Outcomes and prognostic factors of endodontically treated teeth filled with calcium silicate- or epoxy resin-based root canal sealers: A retrospective cohort study

AIM

The objectives of this study were to compare the clinical outcomes of root canal treatment between calcium silicate-based sealer using the cold hydraulic condensation technique and epoxy resin-based sealer using warm vertical compaction and to identify the prognostic factors affecting the outcomes of both obturation techniques.

METHODOLOGY

Dental records and radiographs of the teeth that received root canal treatment with calcium silicate-based sealer using the cold hydraulic condensation technique or epoxy resin-based sealer using warm vertical compaction during 2015-2021 were selected using inclusion and exclusion criteria. The cases were matched between the two groups based on four factors: primary root canal treatment or retreatment, tooth type, periapical lesion and its size and extension of root canal filling. The success rates of root canal treatment between two sealers/obturation techniques were analysed. The incidence and resorption of extruded sealer were evaluated using the McNemar's test. Generalized estimated equations were used to evaluate any prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The median recall period of this study was 15 months. A total of 234 teeth, comprising 117 cases in each sealer/obturation group, were included. No significant difference was found in the success rates between the calcium silicate-based sealer using the cold hydraulic condensation technique group (91.5%) and the epoxy resin-based sealer using the warm vertical compaction group (94.9%). The incidence of sealer extrusion for the calcium silicate-based sealer (27.6%) did not significantly differ from that of the epoxy resin-based sealer (36.2%), with both sealers typically demonstrating no resorption at recalls. No prognostic factors related to the success rate of either technique were detected.

CONCLUSION

The study findings suggest no difference in the success rate between calcium silicate-based sealer and epoxy resin-based sealer. The study did not identify any prognostic factors that significantly influenced the outcomes of the endodontic treatments.

Clinical outcome of root canal obturation using different based sealers: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess and compare the performance of root canal treatment obturated either with calcium silicate-based or epoxy resin-based root canal sealers on retreatment cases with periapical lesions.

METHODS

Patients' radiographic data and clinical records were obtained retrospectively from the computerized patient record system. A total of 44 teeth, 28 teeth treated with calcium silicate-based sealer and 16 teeth treated with epoxy resin-based sealer, were included in the study. The mean follow-up period was 11.9 months for calcium silicate-based sealer and 23.6 months for epoxy resin based sealer groups. The outcome was evaluated based on radiographic findings and clinical records of the patients. Chi-square test and Fisher's Exact test were used to examine the differences between categorical variables. An independent samples t-test was used to compare the initial and final PAI differences based on sealer type.

RESULTS

The success rate was 100% for calcium silicate-based sealer and 93.75% for epoxy resin-based sealer. Calcium silicate-based sealer showed a faster healing capacity than epoxy resin-based sealer.

CONCLUSIONS

Both sealers are viable options for retreatment cases, but calcium silicate-based sealer has a faster healing potential.

Comparison between AH plus sealer and total fill bioceramic sealer performance in previously untreated and retreatment cases of maxillary incisors with large-sized periapical lesion: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the efficacy of bioceramic (BC) sealer when applied using the single cone technique (SCT), in comparison to AH Plus sealer applied with the cold lateral condensation technique (LCT), concerning their impact on the healing of large-sized periapical lesions in both untreated and retreatment cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 41 patients who had 60 permanent teeth in the maxillary incisors that were accompanied by large-sized periapical lesions. The included teeth were radiographed with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images and divided equally into two groups according to the endodontic treatment statute (30 untreated previous cases and 30 retreated cases). Subsequently, teeth received uniform preparation, irrigation, and dressing procedures. Then each group was divided equally according to the used sealer (15 teeth obturated using AH plus sealer with LCT and 15 teeth obturated using BC sealer with SCT). All cases were followed up after 6 and 12 months with CBCT images. Subsequently, the change in periapical lesion diameter (PLD) was observed as an indicator to determine the treatment outcome score. One-way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U test were used to analyze the PLD changing and scoring the treatment outcome during the follow-up periods. The significance level was set at α = 0.05.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between untreated and retreatment cases neither using AH plus sealer with LCT nor BC sealer with SCT regarding changes in PLD in the follow-up periods. Moreover, there were no significant differences between groups regarding treatment outcome scores in the follow-up periods. All groups showed a high success rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful treatment was achieved for untreated or retreatment maxillary incisor cases accompanied by large-sized periapical lesions using either BC sealer with the SCT or AH Plus sealer with LCT with a similar high success rate up to 12 months follow-up period.

Clinical outcome of non-surgical root canal treatment using different sealers and techniques of obturation in 237 patients: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical results of two root canal sealers and three obturation techniques used for non-surgical root canal treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of two hundred eighty-three root canal treated teeth in two hundred thirty-seven patients with minimum a 6-month follow-up was included for this study. The canals were filled with three different modes: 1) cold lateral condensation (CLC) and AH Plus Sealer; 2) continuous wave condensation technique (CWC) and AH Plus Sealer, and 3) sealer-based obturation technique (SBO) and AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer. The treatment outcome was analysed based on clinical signs and symptoms, and periapical radiograph (periapical index, PAI).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in treatment outcome between various sealers and filling techniques applied. The sealer extrusion was found most frequently in the CWC group (60.67%), followed by SBO (59.21%) and CLC (21.19%) with statistically significant differences (p < .05). The initial diagnosis, previous treatment and sealer extrusion (p < .05) were prognostic factors that affected treatment outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the findings of this study, neither the sealer type nor the filling technique affected the treatment success while preoperative diagnosis, previous treatment and sealer extrusion had significant effect on the outcome.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A bioceramic sealant applied along with the single-cone technique might be considered as an alternative method in root canal obturation.

The efficacy of premixed bioceramic sealers versus standard sealers on root canal treatment outcome, extrusion rate and post-obturation pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Limited evidence is available regarding the superior clinical properties of bioceramic sealers comparted with traditional standard sealers.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to answer the following research questions: 'In healthy patients requiring a root canal treatment (P), what is the efficacy of premixed bioceramic sealers (I) compared with traditional root canal epoxy resin-based sealers (C) in terms of survival, success rates (PICO1) sealer extrusion and resorption (PICO2) post-obturation pain (PICO3) (O)?'

METHODS

Authors independently searched three electronic databases: PubMed (including MEDLINE), Web of Science, Embase and Scopus up to 31 October 2023. This was accompanied by both grey literature and manual search. Detailed selection criteria were applied, namely mature permanent teeth requiring root canal treatment, premixed bioceramic sealer with gutta-percha as an intervention group, a standard filling technique as control group and full-text available in English. A random-effect meta-analysis was used to synthesize the body of evidence regarding the use of bioceramic sealers in root canal treatment and their impact on post-obturation pain. Effect sizes were represented as relative risks on a logarithmic scale for binary outcomes and as mean differences for continuous outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 941 articles were identified. Fifteen Comparative clinical studies were finally included. Eleven were randomized clinical trials, and four were prospective clinical trials with control group. The follow-up of these studies was not greater than 2 years. No publication bias was observed in any study. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of survival and success rates. A small non-significant lower risk of extrusion was observed for bioceramics. A small, non-significantly lower post-operative-pain within 24-h was observed when bioceramics were used.

DISCUSSION

The majority of current evidence shows inconsistencies in reporting and is of short-term duration. Robust prospective long-term trials are needed in this area to better support future recommendations.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review is the first to analyse several clinical outcomes using premixed sealers. Included studies differed in terms of clinical protocol and operator expertise, but reported a similar outcome when comparing bioceramic versus standard sealers. Tooth survival, treatment outcome, post-operative pain and periapical extrusion were similar and presented no significant differences between the two sealer types.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO database (CRD42023449151).