1
|
Puranik AD, Choudhury S, Ghosh S, Dev ID, Ramchandani V, Uppal A, Bhosale V, Palsapure A, Rungta R, Pandey R, Khatri S, George G, Satamwar Y, Maske R, Agrawal A, Shah S, Purandare NC, Rangarajan V. Tata Memorial Centre Evidence Based Use of Nuclear medicine diagnostic and treatment modalities in cancer. Indian J Cancer 2024; 61:S1-S28. [PMID: 38424680 DOI: 10.4103/ijc.ijc_52_24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT PET/CT and radioisotope therapy are diagnostic and therapeutic arms of Nuclear Medicine, respectively. With the emergence of better technology, PET/CT has become an accessible modality. Diagnostic tracers exploring disease-specific targets has led the clinicians to look beyond FDG PET. Moreover, with the emergence of theranostic pairs of radiopharmaceuticals, radioisotope therapy is gradually making it's way into treatment algorithm of common cancers in India. We therefore would like to discuss in detail the updates in PET/CT imaging and radionuclide therapy and generate a consensus-driven evidence based document which would guide the practitioners of Oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ameya D Puranik
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital and Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Kol K, Ebisch R, Beugeling M, Cnossen J, Nederend J, van Hamont D, Coppus S, Piek J, Bekkers R. Comparing Methods to Determine Complete Response to Chemoradiation in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:198. [PMID: 38201625 PMCID: PMC10778528 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is no consensus on the most reliable procedure to determine remission of cervical cancer after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Therefore, this study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of two different imaging techniques, MRI and 18F[FDG]-PET/CT, in determining the presence of locoregional residual disease after CRT in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS Patients diagnosed with locally advanced cervical cancer (FIGO 2009) treated with CRT were retrospectively identified from a regional cohort. The accuracy of MRI and 18F[FDG]-PET/CT in detecting locoregional residual disease was assessed with histology as the reference standard. RESULTS The negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) for locoregional residual disease detection of MRI and 18F[FDG]-PET/CT combined were 84.2% (95% CI 73.2-92.1), and 70.4% (95% CI 51.8-85.2), respectively. The NPV and PPV of MRI alone were 80.2% (95% CI 71.2-87.5) and 47.7% (95% CI 35.8-59.7), respectively, and values of 81.1% (95% CI 72.2-88.3) and 55.8 (95% CI 42.2-68.7), respectively, were obtained for 18F[FDG]-PET/CT alone. CONCLUSION In this study, the reliability of MRI and 18F[FDG]-PET/CT in detecting locoregional residual disease was limited. Combining MRI and 18F[FDG]-PET/CT did not improve predictive values. Routine use of both MRI and 18F[FDG]-PET/CT in the follow-up after CRT should be avoided. MRI during follow-up is the advised imaging technique. Pathology confirmation of the presence of locoregional residual disease before performing salvage surgery is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim van Kol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands (J.P.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Renée Ebisch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
| | - Maaike Beugeling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute Verbeeten (BVI), 5042 SB Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Jeltsje Cnossen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Nederend
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Dennis van Hamont
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amphia Hospital, 4818 CK Breda, The Netherlands;
| | - Sjors Coppus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maxima Medical Center, 5631 BM Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Jurgen Piek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands (J.P.)
| | - Ruud Bekkers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands (J.P.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lakhman Y, Aherne EA, Jayaprakasam VS, Nougaret S, Reinhold C. Staging of Cervical Cancer: A Practical Approach Using MRI and FDG PET. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2023; 221:633-648. [PMID: 37459457 PMCID: PMC467038 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.23.29003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
This review provides a practical approach to the imaging evaluation of patients with cervical cancer (CC), from initial diagnosis to restaging of recurrence, focusing on MRI and FDG PET. The primary updates to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) CC staging system, as well as these updates' relevance to clinical management, are discussed. The recent literature investigating the role of MRI and FDG PET in CC staging and image-guided brachytherapy is summarized. The utility of MRI and FDG PET in response assessment and posttreatment surveillance is described. Important findings on MRI and FDG PET that interpreting radiologists should recognize and report are illustrated. The essential elements of structured reports during various phases of CC management are outlined. Special considerations, including the role of imaging in patients desiring fertility-sparing management, differentiation of CC and endometrial cancer, and unusual CC histologies, are also described. Finally, future research directions including PET/MRI, novel PET tracers, and artificial intelligence applications are highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yulia Lakhman
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065
| | - Emily A Aherne
- Department of Radiology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065
| | - Stephanie Nougaret
- Department of Radiology, Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
- Pinkcc Lab, IRCM, Montpellier, France
| | - Caroline Reinhold
- Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Augmented Intelligence & Precision Health Laboratory, Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ciulla S, Celli V, Aiello AA, Gigli S, Ninkova R, Miceli V, Ercolani G, Dolciami M, Ricci P, Palaia I, Catalano C, Manganaro L. Post treatment imaging in patients with local advanced cervical carcinoma. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1003930. [PMID: 36465360 PMCID: PMC9710522 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1003930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth leading cause of death in women worldwide and despite the introduction of screening programs about 30% of patients presents advanced disease at diagnosis and 30-50% of them relapse in the first 5-years after treatment. According to FIGO staging system 2018, stage IB3-IVA are classified as locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC); its correct therapeutic choice remains still controversial and includes neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, hysterectomy or a combination of these modalities. In this review we focus on the most appropriated therapeutic options for LACC and imaging protocols used for its correct follow-up. We explore the imaging findings after radiotherapy and surgery and discuss the role of imaging in evaluating the response rate to treatment, selecting patients for salvage surgery and evaluating recurrence of disease. We also introduce and evaluate the advances of the emerging imaging techniques mainly represented by spectroscopy, PET-MRI, and radiomics which have improved diagnostic accuracy and are approaching to future direction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Ciulla
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - V Celli
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - A A Aiello
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - S Gigli
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - R Ninkova
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - V Miceli
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - G Ercolani
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - M Dolciami
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - P Ricci
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - I Palaia
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - C Catalano
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - L Manganaro
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|