1
|
Hida WT, Moscovici BK, Cortez CM, Colombo-Barboza GN, Tzelikis PFDM, Motta AFP, De Medeiros AL, Nose W, Carricondo PC. Comparison of visual outcomes of bilateral dual-technology diffractive intraocular lens vs blended enhanced monofocal with dual-technology intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2024; 50:401-406. [PMID: 38085244 DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare clinical outcomes after implantation of TECNIS Synergy (ZFR00V) intraocular lenses (IOLs) in both eyes and implantation of the TECNIS Synergy and TECNIS Eyhance (ICB00) combination in patients undergoing cataract surgery. SETTING Department of Cataract, Hospital Oftalmológico de Brasilia (HOB), Brasília, Brazil. DESIGN Prospective, interventional, randomized, parallel-group study. METHODS Patients were categorized into 2 groups: Group 1: ZFR00V IOL was implanted in both eyes. Group 2: An ICB00 IOL was implanted in the dominant eye, and a ZFR00V IOL was implanted in the nondominant eye. RESULTS Visual acuity was similar between the 2 groups (95% CI <0.1 logMAR). A superior visual acuity of ≥ 20/25 (at -2.00 to -2.50 diopters [D]) was achieved in Group 1 (bilateral ZFR00V) than in Group 2 (combination of ZFR00V/ICB00). The binocular defocus curve demonstrated better visual acuity at 40 cm (-2.00 D) and 50 cm (-2.50 D) in Group 1 than in Group 2 ( P < .05). Similar contrast sensitivity values were observed between the 2 groups. Patients in Group 1 reported higher satisfaction (completely satisfied) than those in Group 2 ( P < .05). However, halos and glare were more pronounced in Group 1 than in Group 2 ( P < .05). CONCLUSIONS Both presbyopia-correcting IOL combinations showed similar binocular visual acuity results. Group 1 demonstrated enhanced visual acuity in the defocus curve at 40 cm (-2.00 D) and 50 cm (-2.50 D). Comparable contrast sensitivity outcomes were observed in both groups. Patients were more completely satisfied in Group 1 than in Group 2, despite the higher frequency of postoperative nighttime halos and glare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wilson Takashi Hida
- From the Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Oftalmológico de Brasília (HOB), Brasília, Brazil (Hida, Cortez, Tzelikis); Department of Ophthalmology, University of Sao Paulo (HC-FMUSP), Sao Paulo, Brazil (Hida, Carricondo); Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), Sao Paulo, Brazil (Moscovici, Nose); Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Visão Laser, Santos, Brazil (Moscovici, Colombo-Barboza, Tzelikis); Department of Ophthalmology, Renato Ambrosio Research Center (CEORA), Brasília, Brazil (Cortez, Tzelikis, Motta, De Medeiros)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moore J, Østergaard J, Kretz F. Visual performance and patient preference with bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus or combined implantation of an extended depth of focus/trifocal intraocular lens. Int Ophthalmol 2024; 44:80. [PMID: 38356027 PMCID: PMC10866775 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-024-03030-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Evaluate postoperative visual performance in patients with bilaterally implanted AT LARA or AT LARA/AT LISA tri (Carl Zeiss AG, Jena, Germany) intraocular lenses. METHODS Multicentered, comparative, open-label, retrospective/prospective study. Post-IOL implantation, patients were prospectively enrolled into this study; preoperative patient data were collected retrospectively. Follow-up was at 2-4 and 5-8 months post-surgery. The primary endpoint was binocular best corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). The study was retrospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT05462067). RESULTS Seventy-one patients (142 eyes) were enrolled; 67 patients (134 eyes) have 5-8 months data. The mean binocular CDVA at 2-4 months was -0.10 ± 0.06 logMAR in the bilateral AT LARA group ("bilateral") and -0.11 ± 0.09 logMAR in the combined implantation AT LARA/ AT LISA tri group ("combined implantation"); (P = 0.4856). At 5-8 months, mean binocular CDVA was -0.13 ± 0.06 logMAR in the bilateral group and -0.11 ± 0.09 in the combined implantation group (P = 0.4003). At 5-8 months, more eyes in the bilateral group attained 0.2 logMAR or better binocular uncorrected intermediate VA (UIVA; 67 cm) than those in the combined implantation group (100% vs. 94%, respectively). The bilateral group achieved a mean of 0.24 ± 0.11 logMAR in uncorrected near VA (UCNVA), compared to a mean of 0.16 ± 0.12 logMAR in the combined implantation group at 5-8 months (P = 0.0041). CONCLUSIONS A combined implantation approach (AT LARA in the distance dominant eye/AT LISA tri in the non-dominant eye) produced similar CDVA outcomes but better UCNVA as bilateral implantation with the AT LARA. UIVA was comparable between groups. No new safety concerns were reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Florian Kretz
- Augentagesklinik Rheine, Osnabrücker Straße 233 -235, 48429, Rheine, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Danzinger V, Schartmüller D, Schwarzenbacher L, Röggla V, Abela-Formanek C, Menapace R, Leydolt C. Clinical prospective intra-individual comparison after mix-and-match implantation of a monofocal EDOF and a diffractive trifocal IOL. Eye (Lond) 2024; 38:321-327. [PMID: 37524833 PMCID: PMC10811191 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-023-02682-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess intra-individually visual acuity (VA) and subjective outcome after mix-and-match implantation of a monofocal EDOF IOL and a diffractive trifocal IOL. METHODS The monofocal EDOF Isopure IOL was implanted in the dominant eye and the trifocal FineVision HP IOL in the non-dominant eye. Postoperative evaluation included VA at various distances, contrast acuity, monocular defocus curves, decentration and tilt, wavefront aberrometry, VF-7 questionnaire and a halo and glare simulator. RESULTS 50 eyes of 25 subjects were enroled. The trifocal IOL performed better at monocular DCNVA (p < 0.01) and at defocus levels of -1.5D to -4.0D (p < 0.01), the monofocal EDOF IOL was better at -0.5D (p = 0.013). No differences in monocular BCDVA, DCIVA, contrast acuity, decentration or tilt were observed (p > 0.05). Wavefront analysis revealed lower HOAs in the trifocal group at 5 mm (p < 0.01) and no difference (p = 0.107) at 3 mm pupil aperture. The monofocal EDOF IOL displayed increased negative SA at 5 mm (p < 0.01) and 3 mm (p < 0.01) pupil diameter. Low values of optical phenomena and satisfying results of the VF-7 questionnaire were obtained. CONCLUSION Excellent visual performance and low rates of optical phenomena were achieved after mix-and-match implantation of the monofocal EDOF Isopure IOL and the trifocal FineVision HP IOL. Trifocal IOL implantation in the non-dominant eye may decrease optical disturbing phenomena. Similar results were observed for monocular distance, intermediate and contrast VA. The trifocal IOL provided better monocular near VA. Decentration and tilt and HOAs were low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Danzinger
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniel Schartmüller
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Vienna, Austria
| | - Luca Schwarzenbacher
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Vienna, Austria
| | - Veronika Röggla
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Rupert Menapace
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christina Leydolt
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang J, Shao J, Cao X, Zhang Y, Zheng L. Defocus Curve and Satisfaction of Patients with Presbyopia After LASIK Using the Differential Modulation of Binocular Longitudinal Spherical Aberration. Clin Ophthalmol 2023; 17:3531-3542. [PMID: 38026604 PMCID: PMC10676107 DOI: 10.2147/opth.s437324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the visual acuity and satisfaction of patients after Zhang & Zheng's corneal laser-enhanced accommodation refraction Q (ZZ-CLEAR-Q) surgery utilizing differential modulation of binocular longitudinal spherical aberration and determine its clinical significance. Patients and Methods This prospective observational study enrolled a consecutive cohort of patients with presbyopia who underwent ZZ-CLEAR-Q surgery between December 2020 and January 2023. The study assessed visual acuity, distance-corrected defocus curve, satisfaction, Q factor, manifest spherical equivalent, and primary spherical aberration, among others, at 3 months postoperatively. Additionally, the study conducted a binocular comparison to analyze the clinical significance of setting the different longitudinal spherical aberrations. Results A total of 232 eyes of 116 patients were included. The binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 for all patients. At 3 months postoperatively, the binocular uncorrected near visual acuity was Jaeger 1 for 96% of the patients and Jaeger 2 for 100% of the patients. Furthermore, 93.1% of the patients expressed satisfaction. The monocular distance-corrected defocus curve revealed that the dominant eyes had significantly better visual acuity at 0 D (P<0.001), while the non-dominant eyes had significantly better visual acuity across various defocus levels except 0 and -0.50 D (All P<0.05). At 3 months, there were no significant differences between the expected and achieved manifest spherical equivalents, corneal Q factor values, and ocular primary spherical aberration values of both groups. Conclusion Patients with presbyopia who underwent ZZ-CLEAR-Q surgery were likely to achieve normal uncorrected visual acuity and be satisfied. The increased depth of field has clinical significance for assisting near vision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Zhang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hangzhou MSK Eye Hospital, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jie Shao
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hangzhou MSK Eye Hospital, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xinfang Cao
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hangzhou MSK Eye Hospital, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yonggang Zhang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hangzhou MSK Eye Hospital, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Li Zheng
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hangzhou MSK Eye Hospital, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
McNeely RN, Stewart SA, Moore JE. Visual performance and subjective experience 3 months and 12 months after combined implantation of 2 new complementary continuous phase multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2023; 49:921-928. [PMID: 37291750 DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the 3-month and 12-month postoperative visual performance and subjective quality of vision (QoV) after combined implantation of complementary continuous phase multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). SETTING Private practice, United Kingdom. DESIGN Case series. METHODS The study enrolled 44 patients undergoing phacoemulsification with implantation of an Artis Symbiose Mid in the dominant eye and an Artis Symbiose Plus in the nondominant eye. Refraction, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity, uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), electronic reading desk, and a QoV questionnaire were evaluated at 3 months and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS The mean binocular UDVA was -0.06 ± 0.08 logMAR and -0.07 ± 0.06 logMAR at 3 months and 12 months ( P = .097), respectively. The mean binocular UIVA was 0.03 ± 0.13 logMAR and 0.03 ± 0.10 logMAR ( P = 1.0), respectively. The mean binocular UNVA was 0.07 ± 0.10 logMAR and 0.07 ± 0.08 logMAR ( P = .875), respectively. There was a significant improvement in QoV for both day and night between 3 and 12 months, with a significant reduction in halos at 12 months. Spectacle independence was reported in 93.2% of cases at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS The Artis Symbiose Mid and Plus IOL combined implantation provided an excellent range of uncorrected vision at 3 and 12 months. There was a significant improvement in QoV and less halos at 12 months. This IOL combination provided very high rates of complete spectacle independence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard N McNeely
- From the Cathedral Eye Clinic, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom (McNeely, Stewart, Moore); School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom (Stewart); College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom (Moore); Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China (Moore)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Choi WK, Han HJ, Son HS, Khoramnia R, Auffarth GU, Choi CY. Clinical outcomes of bilateral implantation of new generation monofocal IOL enhanced for intermediate distance and conventional monofocal IOL in a Korean population. BMC Ophthalmol 2023; 23:157. [PMID: 37069559 PMCID: PMC10108453 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-023-02897-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the clinical outcomes of bilateral implantation of enhanced intermediate function intraocular lenses (IOLs) and standard monofocal IOLs. METHODS In this prospective, randomized, comparative controlled study, we compared the visual outcomes of patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery at the Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, with either enhanced monofocal IOLs (Tecnis Eyhance, ICB00, Johnson and Johnson Vision Care, Inc) (Group 1) or standard monofocal IOLs (Tecnis, ZCB00, Johnson and Johnson Vision Care, Inc) (Group 2). The assessment included monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate (UIVA at 60 cm) and near (UNVA at 40 cm) visual acuity, uncorrected defocus curves, contrast sensitivity testing (CST), and reading speed test using Quality of vision was evaluated using the Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25). RESULTS At 3-months postoperatively, monocular and binocular outcomes of UIVA and UNVA were statistically significantly better in Group 1 (P < 0.05). The binocular uncorrected defocus curve of Group 1 showed statistically significantly better outcomes at vergence ranges of -1.5 to -4.0 D (P < 0.05). Significantly higher reading speed test was also observed in Group 1 in all ranges tested (1.0 to 0.1 LogMAR) (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in CST between groups. CONCLUSIONS Bilateral implantation of enhanced monofocal IOLs provided better vision at intermediate and near distances compared to standard monofocal IOLs, while maintaining good distance vision and contrast sensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wan Kyu Choi
- Department of Ophthalmology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 29 Saemunan-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03181, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyo Ji Han
- Department of Ophthalmology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 29 Saemunan-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03181, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeck-Soo Son
- Department of Ophthalmology, The David J. Apple International Laboratory for Ocular Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ramin Khoramnia
- Department of Ophthalmology, The David J. Apple International Laboratory for Ocular Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gerd U Auffarth
- Department of Ophthalmology, The David J. Apple International Laboratory for Ocular Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Chul Young Choi
- Department of Ophthalmology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 29 Saemunan-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03181, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|