Prediction of the Collapse of Necrotic Femoral Head by CT and X-Ray Examinations before Hip Replacement Based on Intelligent Medical Big Data

Predicting efficacy and guiding procedure choice in non-vascularized bone grafting: a CT Radiomics and clinical predictor approach

OBJECTIVES

There is no practical approach for accurately predicting the efficacy of non-vascularized bone grafting (NVBG) and guiding its optimal procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study enrolled 153 patients with 182 hips that underwent NVBG procedures. The patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 130) and a validation cohort (n = 52). In the training cohort, radiomics model, clinical model, and combined radiomics-clinical (C-R) model were constructed using Rad-scores and clinical predictors to predict the efficacy of NVBG. The optimal model was visualized by a nomogram and assessed by decision curve analysis (DCA). 128 hips that underwent successful NVBG were then randomized into a new training cohort (n = 92) and a new validation cohort (n = 36), and three models were constructed and validated to predict the choice of NVBG procedure.

RESULTS

Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) classification, exposure to risk factors postoperative, and Rad-scores consisting of four radiomics features were independent predictors for the efficacy of NVBG (P < 0.05). The C-R model provided better performance in both the training cohort (AUC: 0.818) and validation cohort (AUC: 0.747). To predict the choice of NVBG procedure, the C-R model built by JIC classification and Rad-scores consisting of five radiomics features showed the finest performance in both cohorts (AUC: 0.860 and 0.800, respectively). DCA showed great benefit using the C-R model for the choice of NVBG procedure.

CONCLUSION

The approach integrated by CT radiomics and clinical predictors can be visually and quantitatively applied to predict the efficacy and guide the choice of NVBG procedure with great predictive accuracy.

Femoral Head Osteonecrosis: Computed Tomography Not Needed to Identify Collapse When Using the Association Research Circulation Osseous Staging System

Background

The 2019 Revised Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) Staging Criteria for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head (ONFH) only requires plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to diagnose and stage ONFH; however, the effectiveness of the 2019 ARCO criteria in the absence of computed tomography (CT) scans has not been investigated. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate whether CT scanning is a necessary modality for diagnosing/staging ONFH using the ARCO staging system. More specifically, do CT scans help differentiate pre- and post-collapse lesions more than MRI scans?

Methods

A study was conducted on 228 ONFH patients diagnosed between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2018, at a single academic medical center. CT and MRI scans were reviewed by the senior author and other contributors. The ONFH classification was compared between the 2 scans to determine if CT scans were able to further differentiate staging of collapsed lesions vs MRI scans.

Results

A diagnosis of ONFH was made by MRI first in 57% (129/228) while 21% (48/228) used MRI and CT simultaneously. Only 22% (51/228) of cases were diagnosed by CT scans first. There were no cases where collapse was found by a CT scan that were not diagnosed by standard x-rays and/or MRIs.

Conclusions

CT scans are not a useful adjunct for diagnosing or treating ONFH and are not necessary if MRI is ordered when using the Revised ARCO Staging System for ONFH diagnosis.

Retracted: Prediction of the Collapse of Necrotic Femoral Head by CT and X-Ray Examinations before Hip Replacement Based on Intelligent Medical Big Data

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1155/2021/9971236.].