Analysis of Rehabilitation Effect of Neurology Nursing on Stroke Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Its Influence on Quality of Life and Negative Emotion Score

Pre- and post-operative comprehensive nursing care versus conventional nursing care: An evaluation of quality of life, postoperative pain, adverse effects, and treatment satisfaction of patients who underwent surgeries and interventional therapies for liver cancer

Interventional therapies including chemotherapies and radiotherapies are the most preferred treatment for liver cancer. However, these therapies have adverse effects. Therefore, careful care is required to relieve these adverse effects. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the quality of life, pain, anxiety, depression, adverse effects, and satisfaction of patients with liver cancer who received pre- and post-operative comprehensive nursing care against those of patients who received conventional nursing care. Patients with liver cancer who underwent surgeries and interventional therapies for liver cancer received pre- and post-operative comprehensive nursing care (CMN cohort, n = 105) or conventional nursing care (CNN cohort, n = 135), or did not receive any kind of nursing care (NNC cohort, n = 175). Before the non-treatment intervention(s) (BL), none of the patients had absent post-operative pain, all patients had mild or moderate anxiety and depression, and patients had ≤70 overall quality of life score. In the NNC cohort, a few of the patients reported being completely dissatisfied with overall personal satisfaction, and anxiety, depression, and overall the quality of life of patients were clinically worse during the follow-up period generally after completion of all doses of chemo radiotherapies (EL) as compared to BL. Hospital stays due to surgery, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Zung Self-rating Anxiety Scale score, the Self-rating Depression Scale score, and rehospitalization due to any reason(s) in follow-up were fewer and overall quality of life score and overall personal satisfaction score were higher for patients of the CMN cohort than those of patients at BL and those of patients of the CNN and the NNC cohorts at EL (P < .05 for all). Fever, bleeding, urinary retention, gastrointestinal disturbance, and hepatic and renal impairments reported in patients of the NNC cohort. Fever, bleeding, and urinary retention reported in patients of the CNN cohort (P < .05 for all). Nursing non-treatment intervention(s) is necessary for liver cancer patients after surgery, in the follow-up, and between 2 doses of chemoradiotherapies. Pre- and post-operative comprehensive nursing care relieves postoperative pain, psychological burden and improves quality of life in the follow-up period in patients who underwent surgeries and interventional therapies for liver cancer (Level of Evidence: IV; Technical Efficacy: Stage 5).

Effect of Comprehensive Nursing Approach in Perioperative Stage of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Interventional Therapy

Objective. To examine the efficacy of a complete nursing strategy during the perioperative phase for patients undergoing interventional treatment for hepatocellular cancer. Methods. Sixty patients who were diagnosed with liver cancer and underwent interventional therapy in our hospital between February 2019 and December 2021 were recruited in this trial. All study subjects were numbered according to the time when the patients first came to our hospital, and were equally divided into a comprehensive group and a conventional group based on the odd and even number of the last number, with 30 cases in each group. Those in the conventional group received conventional nursing care, whereas patients in the comprehensive group received comprehensive nursing care. Before and after the nursing intervention, the quality of life, pain, and patient satisfaction in both groups were compared. Results. The quality of survival scores, including physical, emotional, role, social, and cognitive function scores of patients in the comprehensive group, were significantly higher than those in the conventional group ( $P<0.05$ ); there was no statistically significant difference in numeric rating scales (NRS) scores between the two groups compared before treatment ( $P>0.05$ ). After treatment, the NRS scores of patients in the study group were significantly lower than those of patients in the control group ( $P<0.05$ ); before the intervention, the difference between the emotional state scores of patients in the two groups was not significant and not statistically significant ( $P>0.05$ ), while the emotional state of patients in both groups improved after the intervention, and the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores of patients in the comprehensive group were lower than those in the conventional group ( $P<0.05$ ); the total incidence of adverse reactions in the comprehensive group (10.00%) was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (46.67%) ( $P<0.05$ ); and the total satisfaction of patients in the comprehensive group (93.33%) was significantly higher than that of patients in the conventional group (73.33%) ( $P<0.05$ ). Conclusion. The intervention of a comprehensive nursing approach in the perioperative period for patients with liver cancer is remarkable as it can relieve patients' psychological burden and pain, ensure a smooth operation, improve patients' postoperative quality of life, and also help to reduce the risk of postoperative adverse reactions, effectively enhancing patients’ satisfaction, and thus deserves to be promoted in clinical practice.