Effect of Preventive Analgesia with Nalbuphine and Dexmedetomidine in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Comparison of the effects of remimazolam and dexmedetomidine on the quality of recovery in functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain usually occur in patients who have undergone functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Remimazolam and dexmedetomidine could enhance the quality of recovery (QoR) after surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of remimazolam and dexmedetomidine with respect to the QoR-40 score of patients who have undergone FESS.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients (18-65 years) scheduled for FESS were randomly allocated to Group R, Group D or Group C. Group R received 0.075 mg/kg remimazolam loading and 0.1 mg/kg/h infusion. Group D received dexmedetomidine (1.0 µg/kg loading, 0.5 µg/kg/h infusion). Group C received a placebo equal to dexmedetomidine. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol, sufentanil and cisatracurium. Anaesthesia maintenance was performed via target-controlled infusions (TCIs) of propofol and remifentanil. The primary outcome was the QoR-40 score on the day before surgery and postoperative Day 1 (POD1). The secondary outcomes were the time to return to consciousness, length of stay in the PACU, sedation score upon PACU arrival, pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and cumulative consumption of propofol and remifentanil. Adverse effects were recorded.

RESULTS

The total QoR-40 scores (median, IQR) on POD1 decreased less (154.5, 152.0 -159.0) in Groups R and D (155.0, 154.8 -159.3) than in Group C (139.0, 136.8 -142.0) (P < 0.001). The time to return of consciousness and the length of stay in the PACU were significantly shorter in Groups R and C than in Group D (P < 0.001). The level of sedation upon PACU arrival (median, IQR) in Groups R (-2.0, -2.0--1.0) and D (-2.0, -3.0--2.0) was greater than that in Group C (1.0, 0.0 -1.0) (P < 0.001). The cumulative consumption rates of propofol and remifentanil in Groups R and D were lower than that in Group C (P < 0.001). Compared with that in Group C, the pain intensity was lower in Groups R and D (P < 0.001).The number of patients occurring PONV was less in Groups R (3/40) and D (4/40) than in Group C (11/40) (P = 0.024). Fifteen patients had bradycardia in Group D, whereas no bradycardia was noted in Groups R or C (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Administration of remimazolam could provide a similar QoR to that of dexmedetomidine. In addition, remimazolam may be a promising option for improving the QoR of patients who have undergone FESS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2300076209. (Prospectively registered). The initial registration date was 27/9/2023.

Beneficial Effects of Low-Dose Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Premedication in Patient Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under General Anesthesia: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

Dexmedetomidine (Dex) is a potent and highly selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist. Within an appropriate dose range, Dex can effectively attenuate the surgical stress response, provide intraoperative hemodynamic stability, and improve the patient recovery quality. High-dose Dex can delay patient awakening from anesthesia and increase the incidence of bradycardia. This randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate the effects of low-dose intravenous Dex premedication in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Material and Methods

In total, 100 patients undergoing LC were equally randomized into Group C (premedication with saline) and Group D (premedication with 0.5 µg/kg Dex). The patients were premedicated with saline or Dex, depending on the group, before anesthesia induction. Following this, anesthesia induction and endotracheal intubation was performed, and anesthesia was maintained during surgery. Following the completion of the surgery, the patients were transferred the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and stayed there until they met the PACU discharge criteria. The hemodynamic parameters, consumption of anesthetics, surgical duration, postoperative awakening time, extubation time, postoperative pain, and complications were recorded.

Results

No significant differences were observed in the heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) between the two groups before premedication (P>0.05). The MAP and HR immediately after endotracheal intubation and immediately after extubation were significantly lower in Group D than in Group C (P<0.05 for both). The incidence of bradycardia was significantly higher in Group D than in Group C (P<0.05), while atropine was used in neither group. Propofol and remifentanil consumption was significantly lower in Group D than in Group C (P<0.05). The postoperative awakening and extubation times were significantly shorter in Group D than in Group C (P<0.05). The postoperative visual analog scale scores for pain and incidence of nausea, vomiting, and cough were significantly lower in Group D than in Group C (P<0.05 for all).

Conclusion

Our data suggest that premedication with dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/kg) before general anesthesia induction can effectively attenuate intraoperative stress response and postoperative pain, maintain perioperative hemodynamic stability, and decrease the incidence of adverse events, which might be an effective and safe anesthetic protocol during LC worthy of further clinical application.

Effect of butorphanol-soaked nasal packing after endoscopic nasal surgery: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to investigate the effect of butorphanol-soaked nasal packing on analgesia and sleep quality in patients undergoing bilateral endoscopic nasal surgery.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into three groups: group B1 (butorphanol 0.03mg/kg), group B2 (butorphanol 0.04mg/kg) and group N (control group). The primary outcome was postoperative pain scores evaluated by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 2h (T1), 8h (T2), 24h (T3) and 48h (T4) after surgery. Secondary outcome was postoperative sleep quality measured using Subjective Sleep Quality Value (SSQV).

RESULTS

Postoperative VAS scores of butorphanol groups were significantly lower than the control group at T2, T3 and T4. VAS scores at each time point did not differ between groups B1 and B2. On the first and second nights after surgery, SSQV was higher in butorphanol groups than in the control group. There were no significant differences in SSQV1 and SSQV2 between group B1 and group B2. The incidence of respiratory depression, dizziness, agitation and rescue analgesic use did not show difference among three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Butorphanol-soaked nasal packing can reduce pain and improve sleep quality after bilateral endoscopic nasal surgery without increasing adverse effects. A concentration of 0.03mg/kg may be appropriate for clinical application.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1B.