Preoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, and CEA as the Potential Prognostic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer

Post-diagnosis adiposity and colorectal cancer prognosis: A Global Cancer Update Programme (CUP Global) systematic literature review and meta-analysis

The adiposity influence on colorectal cancer prognosis remains poorly characterised. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on post-diagnosis adiposity measures (body mass index [BMI], waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, weight) or their changes and colorectal cancer outcomes. PubMed and Embase were searched through 28 February 2022. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted when at least three studies had sufficient information. The quality of evidence was interpreted and graded by the Global Cancer Update Programme (CUP Global) independent Expert Committee on Cancer Survivorship and Expert Panel. We reviewed 124 observational studies (85 publications). Meta-analyses were possible for BMI and all-cause mortality, colorectal cancer-specific mortality, and cancer recurrence/disease-free survival. Non-linear meta-analysis indicated a reverse J-shaped association between BMI and colorectal cancer outcomes (nadir at BMI 28 kg/m2). The highest risk, relative to the nadir, was observed at both ends of the BMI distribution (18 and 38 kg/m2), namely 60% and 23% higher risk for all-cause mortality; 95% and 26% for colorectal cancer-specific mortality; and 37% and 24% for cancer recurrence/disease-free survival, respectively. The higher risk with low BMI was attenuated in secondary analyses of RCTs (compared to cohort studies), among studies with longer follow-up, and in women suggesting potential methodological limitations and/or altered physiological state. Descriptively synthesised studies on other adiposity-outcome associations of interest were limited in number and methodological quality. All the associations were graded as limited (likelihood of causality: no conclusion) due to potential methodological limitations (reverse causation, confounding, selection bias). Additional well-designed observational studies and interventional trials are needed to provide further clarification.

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a new prognostic factor in cancers: a narrative review

The increasing incidence of cancer globally has highlighted the significance of early diagnosis and improvement of treatment strategies. In the 19th century, a connection was made between inflammation and cancer, with inflammation recognized as a malignancy hallmark. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), calculated from a complete blood count, is a simple and accessible biomarker of inflammation status. NLR has also been proven to be a prognostic factor for various medical conditions, including mortality classification in cardiac patients, infectious diseases, postoperative complications, and inflammatory states. In this narrative review, we aim to assess the prognostic potential of NLR in cancer. We will review recent studies that have evaluated the association between NLR and various malignancies. The results of this review will help to further understand the role of NLR in cancer prognosis and inform future research directions. With the increasing incidence of cancer, it is important to identify reliable and accessible prognostic markers to improve patient outcomes. The study of NLR in cancer may provide valuable insights into the development and progression of cancer and inform clinical decision-making.

Role of neutrophils on cancer cells and other immune cells in the tumor microenvironment

The notion that neutrophils only perform a specific set of single functions in the body has changed with the advancement of research methods. As the most abundant myeloid cells in human blood, neutrophils are currently emerging as important regulators of cancer. Given the duality of neutrophils, neutrophil-based tumor therapy has been clinically carried out in recent years and has made some progress. But due to the complexity of the tumor microenvironment, the therapeutic effect is still not satisfactory. Therefore, in this review, we discuss the direct interaction of neutrophils with the five most common cancer cells and other immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Also, this review covered current limitations, potential future possibilities, and therapeutic approaches targeting neutrophil function in cancer therapy.

Metastatic sigmoid adenocarcinoma to the larynx: A case report and updated literature review

Metastatic laryngeal cancer is a rare entity, usually indicating an advanced disease once discovered. In this report, we are describing a case of a 60-year-old male patient with stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC), who presented to our clinic with dysphonia; further workups showed metastatic CRC.

Fashionable, but What is Their Real Clinical Usefulness? NLR, LMR, and PLR as a Promising Indicator in Colorectal Cancer Prognosis: A Systematic Review

The link between inflammation and cancer is still an attractive subject of many studies because systemic inflammatory response has been proven to play a pivotal role in cancer progression and metastasis. The strongest relationship between chronic inflammation and cancer development is observed in colorectal cancer (CRC). The evaluation of ratios derived from the routinely performed inflammatory biomarkers shows limited performances and limited clinical utility when individually used as prognostic factors for patients with CRC. In this review, we would like to summarize the latest knowledge about the diagnostic utility of systemic inflammatory ratios: neutrophil/lymphocyte (NLR), lymphocyte/monocyte (LMR), and platelet/lymphocyte (PLR) in CRC. We focused on the papers that assessed the diagnostic utility of blood cell parameters on the basis of the area under the ROC curve published in the recent 6 years. Identification of biomarkers that are significantly associated with prognostic in cancer would help the selection of patients with a high risk of poor outcomes.

New indexes derived from routine blood tests and their clinical application in hepatocellular carcinoma

Considerable efforts have been made in the diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the prognosis of patients with HCC remains poor. The development of officious and easy-to-use indicators that are applicable to all levels of hospitals for the diagnosis, prognosis and risk prediction of HCC may play an important role in improving the current undesirable situation. The occurrence of HCC can cause a series of local and systemic changes, involving liver function, inflammation, immunity, and nutrition, which can be reflected in routine clinical indicators, especially laboratory metrics. A comprehensive analysis of these routine indicators is capable of providing important information for the clinical management of HCC. Routine clinical indicators are daily medical data that are readily available, easily repeatable, and highly acceptable, which has attracted clinicians to derive a number of comprehensive indexes from routine clinical indicators by means of four arithmetic operations, scoring system, and mathematical modeling. These indexes integrate several clinical indicators into a new single indicator that performs better than any of original individual indicators in the risk prediction, clinical diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of HCC and is easy to use. Herein, we reviewed recent indexes derived from routine clinical indicators for the diagnosis, prognosis and risk prediction of HCC.

Effect of the systemic immune-inflammation index on postoperative complications and the long-term prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignant tumors of the digestive tract. Surgery is the main way to cure CRC, but the postoperative complication rate and recurrence rate remain high. The systemic immune-inflammation (SII) index reflects a patient's systemic inflammatory state and immune state. Postoperative recurrence and the occurrence of complications are closely related to the inflammatory state and immune state. Thus, the SII index may have some value in predicting postoperative complications and the long-term prognosis of CRC patients, but relevant studies are currently lacking. The present study sought to examine the effect of the SII index on the postoperative complications and long-term prognosis of patients with CRC.

METHODS

From January 2014 to January 2017, the data of 440 patients with CRC who had been admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University were retrospectively collected, and the patients were equally divided into the high and the low SII groups according to their preoperative SII index levels. The postoperative complication rate and postoperative progression-free survival (PFS) and mortality between the 2 groups were compared.

RESULTS

Compared to the low SII group, the incidence of postoperative infection in the high SII group was significantly increased (15.45% vs. 9.09%, P=0.042), mortality was significantly increased at 5 years postoperatively (20.91% vs. 7.27%, P<0.001), and PFS was significantly shortened (P<0.001). The SII index had certain predictive value for postoperative infection in CRC patients, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.645 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.559-0.731, P=0.001]. The SII index also had certain predictive value for the progression of CRC patients within 5 years of surgery, and the AUC was 0.670 (95% CI: 0.610-0.729, P<0.001). Additionally, the SII index had certain predictive value for death within 5 years of surgery in patients with CRC, and the AUC was 0.660 (95% CI: 0.593-0.726, P<0.001). CRC patients with postoperative infection had a significantly shorter PFS period than those who did not develop postoperative infection (P=0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

The SII index has certain predictive value for the diagnosis of postoperative infectious complications and the long-term prognosis of CRC patients.

Development and validation of a nomogram based on neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and fibrinogen-to-lymphocyte ratio for predicting recurrence of colorectal adenoma

Background

There are many risk factors for the recurrence of colorectal adenoma (CRA). The purpose of this study was to explore the predictive performance of fibrinogen-to-lymphocyte ratio (FLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on the recurrence of CRA and to construct a predictive model.

Methods

This study analyzed the clinicopathological features of 421 CRA patients who underwent colonoscopy and adenectomy, and evaluated the recurrence of polyps under colonoscopy. Among them, 301 were training cohort and 120 were validation cohort. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors associated with CRA recurrence. Established a nomogram model to predict the risk of recurrence in CRA patients using independent risk factors. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to verify the nomogram model discrimination. Calibration curves were used to verify the model calibration degree. The decision curve analysis (DCA) curves were used to verify the clinical efficacy of the nomogram model.

Results

Totally, six independent predictors, including smoking, diabetes, adenoma number, adenoma size, NLR, and FLR, were enrolled in the nomogram. In the training cohort and validation cohort, the area under the curve (AUC) of the nomogram for predicting the risk of CRA recurrence was 0.846 and 0.841, respectively. The calibration curves displayed a good agreement. DCA curves showed that this model had a high net clinical benefit.

Conclusions

Smoking, diabetes, adenoma number, adenoma size, NLR, and FLR were influencing factors for CRA recurrence.

Prognostic value of cachexia index in patients with colorectal cancer: A retrospective study

Background

Current diagnostic criteria for cancer cachexia are inconsistent, and arguments still exist about the impact of cachexia on the survival of patients with colorectal cancer. In this study, we aim to investigate the prognostic value of a novel cachexia indicator, the cachexia index (CXI), in patients with colorectal cancer.

Methods

The CXI was calculated as skeletal muscle index (SMI) × serum albumin/neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio. The cut-off value of CXI was determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Youden’s index. The major outcomes were major complications, overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Results

A total of 379 patients (234 men and 145 women) were included. The ROC curves indicated that CXI had a significantly diagnostic capacity for the detection of major complications. Based on Youden’s index, there were 231 and 148 patients in the low and high CXI groups, respectively. Patients in the low CXI group had significantly older age, lower BMI, and a higher percentage of cachexia and TNM stage II+III. Besides, Patients in low CXI group were associated with a significantly higher rate of major complications, blood transfusion, and longer length of stay. Logistic regression analysis indicated that low CXI, cachexia, and coronary heart disease were independent risk factors for the major complications. Kaplan Meier survival curves indicated that patients with high CXI had a significantly more favorable OS than those with low CXI, while no significant difference was found in RFS between the two groups. Besides, there were no significant differences in OS or RFS between patients with and without cachexia. The univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that older age, low CXI, and coronary heart disease instead of cachexia were associated with a decreased OS.

Conclusion

CXI was better than cachexia in predicting OS and could be a useful prognostic indicator in patients with colorectal cancer, and greater attention should be paid to patients with low CXI.

Predictive value of NLR and PLR in response to preoperative chemotherapy and prognosis in locally advanced gastric cancer

Purpose

Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR) ratios are markers of systemic inflammation. In patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (GC), the utility of these ratios in predicting tumor regression grade (TRG) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) remains unclear.

Methods

This retrospective study examined 283 locally advanced GC patients who underwent NCT and radical surgery. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the Youden index were applied to identify optimal NLR/PLR cutpoints. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Univariate/multivariate analyses were conducted by the logistic regression method.

Results

TRG grade proved significantly worse in patients with high values of both NLR and PLR whether in univariate (OR = 3.457; p = 0.044) or multivariate (OR = 6.876; p = 0.028) analysis. The degree of tumor differentiation was an independent predictive factor for TRG (OR = 2.874; p = 0.037) in multivariate analysis. In the subgroup analyses, NLR predicted OS (p = 0.04) and DFS (p = 0.03) in female patients, whereas PLR was predictive of both OS (p = 0.026) and DFS (p = 0.018) in patients with clinical TNM stage 3 disease and dissected lymph node counts <28. PLR similarly predicted OS in patients <65 years old (p = 0.049), those with positive lymph nodes (p = 0.021), or those with moderate or poorly differentiated tumors (p = 0.049).

Conclusion

Pretreatment NLR and PLR together serve to independently predict TRG after NCT and surgery in patients with locally advanced GC. Screening for patients with high NLR and PLR values may allow them to benefit upfront from alternatives to NCT.

Prognostic Role of Pretreatment Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis

To identify the prognostic value of the pretreatment geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) in colorectal cancer. Several electronic databases were searched up to March 15, 2022, for relevant studies. The primary and secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), respectively. The hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined. Bess's funnel plot and Egger's test were conducted to detect publication bias, and the trim-and-fill method was performed to identify potentially unpublished papers and their impacts on the overall results. Nine studies from Japan and China involving 3440 participants were enrolled in the current meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that a low pretreatment GNRI was significantly associated with poorer OS (HR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.69-3.07, P < 0.001; I²=63.5%, P_{heterogeneity}=0.005) and DFS (HR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.35-1.96, P < 0.001; I²=46.4%, P_{heterogeneity}=0.114). Subgroup analysis stratified by country and treatment showed similar results. Significant publication bias was manifested by the asymmetric Begg's funnel plot and P = 0.012 of Egger's test, but three potentially unpublished studies did not have a significant impact on the overall results. A lower pretreatment GNRI was a novel prognostic risk factor for Japanese and Chinese colorectal cancer patients.

Combination of Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and Carcinoembryonic Antigen to Predict the Survival of Patients With Colorectal Cancer

Background

This study explored the value of the combination of Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for the prognosis assessment of CRC patients.

Methods

This study retrospectively enrolled 1,014 CRC patients who underwent surgery between 2012 and 2014. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used to compare survival differences. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to assess risk factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Nomograms were constructed to predict the prognosis of CRC patients. Randomized internal validation was used to confirm the predictive accuracy of the prognostic nomograms.

Results

The GNRI-CEA score was established by combining GNRI and CEA. Compared with patients with normal GNRI-CEA scores, patients with mild/moderate/severe GNRI-CEA scores had significantly lower survival (PFS, 68.99% vs. 57.75% vs. 41.34% vs. 31.36%, p < 0.001; OS, 68.99% vs. 57.75% vs. 41.34% vs. 31.36%, p < 0.001). The GNRI-CEA score is an independent factor predicting the prognosis of CRC patients. The risk of death was twofold higher in patients with low GNRI and high CEA than in those with both normal GNRI and CEA [PFS, hazard ratio (HR), 2.339; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.656–3.303; p < 0.001; OS, HR, 2.340; 95% CI, 1.645–3.329; p < 0.001]. Prognostic nomograms had good resolution and accuracy in predicting 1–5 year PFS and OS. Randomized internal validation showed that the nomograms were reliable.

Conclusion

The combination of GNRI and CEA can effectively stratify the prognosis of CRC patients. The nomogram established based on the two indices can provide a personalized reference for prognostic assessment and clinical decision-making for CRC patients.

Analysis of ARHGAP4 Expression With Colorectal Cancer Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis

Background

This study aims to analyze the correlation between ARHGAP4 in the expression and clinical characteristics of colorectal cancer (CRC), and the influence of ARHGAP4 expression on the prognosis of CRC, and to evaluate whether ARHGAP4 is a potential prognostic oncotarget for CRC.

Methods

ARHGAP4 was identified using the Gene Expression Omnibus database through weighted gene coexpression network analysis. Using the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis to perform and analyze the expression and prognosis of ARHGAP4 in CRC. The expression of AGRGAP4 and immune cells was analyzed by the Tumor IMmune Estimation Resource online database. Finally, immunohistochemistry was used to analyze the expression difference and prognosis of ARHGAP4 in CRC and adjacent normal tissues, as well as the relationship between AGRGAP4 expression and clinical features of CRC.

Results

We identified ARHGAP4 that is related to the recurrence of CRC from GSE97781 data. ARHGAP4 has not been reported in CRC. The high expression of ARHGAP4 in select colon adenocarcinoma indicates a poor prognosis by database analysis. In our clinical data results, ARHGAP4 is highly expressed in CRC and lowly expressed in normal tissues adjacent to cancer. Compared with the low-expression group, the high-expression group has a significantly poorer prognosis. In colon cancer, the B-cell, macrophage, neutrophil, and dendritic-cell levels are downregulated after ARHGAP4 gene knockout; the levels of CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cells, neutrophils, and dendritic cells are upregulated after the amplification of the ARHGAP4 gene. In addition, ARHGAP4 expression is related to N,M staging and clinical staging.

Conclusion

ARHGAP4 is highly expressed in CRC, and the high expression of ARHGAP4 has a poor prognosis. The expression of ARHGAP4 in CRC is related to the immune cells such as B cells, CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells. ARHGAP4 is correlated with N,M staging and clinical staging in CRC. ARHGAP4 may be a potential biomarker for the prognosis of CRC.

Preoperative Absolute Lymphocyte Count to Carcinoembryonic Antigen Ratio Is a Superior Predictor of Survival in Stage I to III Colorectal Cancer

Background:

Preoperative absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) are useful prognostic indicators in colorectal cancer (CRC); however, the role of the ALC-to-CEA ratio (LCR) has been less addressed.

Methods:

A total of 189 stage I to III CRC patients who underwent radical resection were enrolled retrospectively. The significance of the LCR in predicting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was calculated and compared with other markers based on ALC. The DFS and OS differences among the low- and high-LCR subgroups and risk factors for the outcome were estimated by Kaplan–Meier analysis and the Cox proportional hazards model, respectively.

Results:

Taking 0.28 as the cutoff point, the LCR has a sensitivity and a specificity of 75.60% and 77.00%, respectively, in predicting OS. The prognostic efficacy of LCR was significantly superior to that of other markers based on ALC for predicting DFS and OS. A total of 34.92% (66/189) of patients displayed a low LCR (<0.28), and these patients were more likely to present poor cell differentiation (P = .03), tumor deposits (P < .01) and advanced T (P < .01) and liver metastasis (P = .02). Patients with a low LCR had significantly worse DFS (Log Rank = 34.98, P < .01) and OS (Log Rank = 43.17, P < .01) than those with a high LCR. The LCR was an independent prognostic factor for both DFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.20-0.62, P < .01) and OS (HR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.08-0.37, P < .01).

Conclusions:

The LCR is a superior predictor of survival in stage I to III CRC, and patients with a low LCR have an inferior outcome; however, additional studies are required to validate its prognostic role.