Review of the Research Progress of Human Brain Oxygen Extraction Fraction by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Research Progress on Glioma Microenvironment and Invasiveness Utilizing Advanced Multi-Parametric Quantitative MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) currently serves as the primary diagnostic method for glioma detection and monitoring. The integration of neurosurgery, radiation therapy, pathology, and radiology in a multi-disciplinary approach has significantly advanced its diagnosis and treatment. However, the prognosis remains unfavorable due to treatment resistance, inconsistent response rates, and high recurrence rates after surgery. These factors are closely associated with the complex molecular characteristics of the tumors, the internal heterogeneity, and the relevant external microenvironment. The complete removal of gliomas presents challenges due to their infiltrative growth pattern along the white matter fibers and perivascular space. Therefore, it is crucial to comprehensively understand the molecular features of gliomas and analyze the internal tumor heterogeneity in order to accurately characterize and quantify the tumor invasion range. The multi-parameter quantitative MRI technique provides an opportunity to investigate the microenvironment and aggressiveness of glioma tumors at the cellular, blood perfusion, and cerebrovascular response levels. Therefore, this review examines the current applications of advanced multi-parameter quantitative MRI in glioma research and explores the prospects for future development.

Oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) values and applications in neurological diseases

One of the goals of this systematic review is to provide a meta-analysis-derived mean OEF of healthy volunteers. Another aim of this study is to indicate the OEF ranges of various neurological pathologies. Potential clinical applications of OEF metrics are presented. Peer-reviewed studies reporting OEF metrics derived from computed tomography (CT)/positron emission tomography (PET) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were considered. Databases utilized included MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The Newcastle-Ottawa scoring system was used for evaluating studies. R Studio was utilized for the meta-analysis calculations when appropriate. The GRADE framework was utilized to assess additional findings. Of 2267 potential studies, 165 met the inclusion criteria. The healthy volunteer meta-analysis included 339 subjects and found a mean OEF value of 38.87 (37.38, 40.36), with a prediction interval of 32.40-45.34. There were no statistical differences in OEF values derived from PET versus MRI. We provided a GRADE A certainty rating for the use of OEF metrics to predict stroke occurrence in patients with symptomatic carotid or cerebral vessel disease. We provided a GRADE B certainty rating for monitoring treatment response in Moyamoya disease. Use of OEF metrics in diagnosing and/or monitoring other conditions had a GRADE C certainty rating or less. OEF might have a role in diagnosing and monitoring patients with symptomatic carotid or cerebral vessel disease and Moyamoya disease. While we found insufficient evidence to support measuring OEF metrics in other patient populations, in many cases, further studies are warranted.