Effect of Clinical Nursing Pathway Intervention Based on Evidence-Based Medicine on Venous Thrombosis in Long-Term Bedridden Patients

Precision nursing and intermittent pneumatic compression significantly reduce perioperative deep vein thrombosis in post-surgical ovarian cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the efficacy of precision nursing combined with intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) devices in preventing perioperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with ovarian cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 136 ovarian cancer surgery patients at Xi'an People's Hospital from February 2019 to April 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: 71 patients received precision nursing with IPC intervention (study group), while the remaining received standard nursing care (control group). Key variables analyzed included operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative blood transfusion requirements, changes in limb circumference, and variations in coagulation parameters activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), D-Dimer (D-D), Fibrinogen (FIB), and Prothrombin Time (PT) before and after surgery. The incidence of DVT was recorded in both groups to determine risk factors for deep vein thrombosis.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative blood transfusion rates (P > 0.05). Post-intervention, significant improvements were noted in the study group, with reduced FIB and D-D levels and increased PT and APTT levels compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the study group exhibited a significantly smaller post-intervention difference in limb circumference and a lower incidence of DVT (P=0.003). Precision nursing combined with IPC, pre-intervention D-D < 498.5, and FIGO stages III+IV were identified as independent factors against DVT development.

CONCLUSION

Precision nursing paired with an IPC device significantly reduces the risk of perioperative DVT in ovarian cancer patients compared to conventional care.

Quantified versus willful handgrip exercises for the prevention of PICC-related thrombosis: A meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Thrombosis is a common yet serious complication in patients with peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC), the prevention of thrombosis is very important to the prognosis of PICC patients. We aimed to evaluate the effects of quantified versus willful grip exercises for the prevention of PICC-related thrombosis, to provide evidence to the clinical nursing care of PICC patients.

METHODS

Two authors searched PubMed et al databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of quantified versus willful grip exercises in PICC patients up to August 31, 2022. Quality assessment and data extraction were independently performed by 2 researchers, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

15 RCTs involving 1741 PICC patients were finally included in this meta-analysis. Synthesized outcomes indicated that compared with willful grip exercises, quantified grip exercises reduced the incidence of PICC-related thrombosis (odds ratio = 0.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.12-0.31) and infection (odds ratio = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.15-0.60) in PICC patients, increased the maximum venous velocity (mean difference = 3.02, 95% CI: 1.87-4.17) and mean blood flow (mean difference = 3.10, 95%CI: 1.57-4.62) in PICC patients (all P < .05). There were no publication biases amongst the synthesized outcomes (all P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Quantified grip exercises can effectively reduce the occurrence of PICC-related thrombosis and infection, improve the venous hemodynamics. Limited by study population and regions, large-sample, and high-quality RCTs are still needed in the future to further evaluate the effects and safety of quantified grip exercises in PICC patients.

Study on the Application Value of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Clinical Nursing Pathway for Postoperative Patients with Esophageal Cancer

Backgrounds

To observe the value of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and clinical nursing pathway for postoperative patients with esophageal cancer (EC).

Methods

A total of 88 postoperative EC patients were divided into the radiotherapy group (RG group, 44 cases) and the chemoradiotherapy group (CRG group, 44 cases). The RG group received single three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy+clinical nursing pathway, and the CRG group was combined with chemotherapy on this basis. The 5-year overall survival rate, progression-free survival rate, pathological remission and survival rate, lymph node metastasis and survival rate, quality of life analysis, tumor-related factor level, and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.

Results

The overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 93.18%, 56.82%, and 50.0% in the CRG group and 86.36%, 52.27%, and 43.18% in the RG group, respectively. The 5-year progression-free survival rate of the CRG group was 60.87%, which was clearly higher than that of the RG group (33.33%). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of pCR and NpCR patients were 90.48%, 80.95%, and 61.90% and 89.55%, 44.78%, and 38.81%, respectively. The overall 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were 81.08%, 37.84, and 24.32% and 96.08%, 66.67%, and 62.75% in patients with lymph node metastasis and nonlymph node metastasis, respectively, with statistical significant differences. The emotional function, physical function, cough, pain, and eating difficulty in the CRG group were better than those in the RG group. After treatment, serum CEA, SCC, CYFRA21-1, and CA199 levels in the CRG group were obviously downregulated compared with those in the RG group. There was no obvious difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the CRG group and the RG group.

Conclusion

Single radiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy can be used as effective means in the treatment of EC. Moreover, the quality of life and survival time of the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group were dramatically better than those of the single radiotherapy group, and the antitumor ability of the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group was stronger.