Documented β-Lactam Allergy and Risk for Cesarean Surgical Site Infection

Effectiveness of chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine for preventing surgical site wound infection: A meta-analysis

A systematic evaluation was conducted to assess the efficacy of two disinfectants, chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine, as primary components in preventing surgical site infection (SSI). A comprehensive computerised search was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI and Wanfang databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine disinfection for the prevention of SSI from inception until July 2023. Two independent researchers completed literature screening, data extraction and quality assessment of the included studies. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software. Ultimately, 20 RCTs were included, which included 13 133 patients, with 6460 patients in the chlorhexidine group and 6673 patients in the povidone-iodine group. The meta-analysis results revealed that the incidence rate of surgical site wound infections [odds ratio (OR): 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.58-0.78, p < 0.001)], superficial SSI rate (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.46-0.75, p < 0.001) and deep SSI rate (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.31-0.79, p = 0.003) were all lower in patients subjected to chlorhexidine disinfection compared to those patients receiving povidone-iodine disinfection. Existing evidence suggests that chlorhexidine is more effective than povidone-iodine at preventing SSI. However, owing to the potential quality limitations of the included studies, further validation through high-quality large-scale RCTs is warranted.

Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of testing pregnant women for penicillin allergy

INTRODUCTION

True penicillin allergy is rare and is commonly incorrectly reported. In fact, less than five percent of patients who report a penicillin allergy will have a currently active clinically-significant IgE- or T-cell-mediated hypersensitivity when appropriately tested. Penicillin is the agent of choice for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce the risk of group B streptococcus early-onset disease in the newborn. Inaccurate penicillin allergy status may lead to inappropriate antibiotic use, as most alternative drugs are more expensive and broader spectrum than penicillin. Penicillin allergy testing has been found to be safe in pregnancy and cost-effective in other patient populations.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of penicillin allergy testing and appropriate antibiotic treatment (test then treat strategy) compared to usual care among pregnant women.

METHODS

We developed a decision tree to evaluate the cost of providing appropriate care via a test then treat strategy for pregnant women who report a penicillin allergy, compared to usual care.

RESULTS

Using the test then treat strategy the additional cost to ensure appropriate care for all pregnant women who report a penicillin allergy, was $1122.38 per person. Adopting a test then treat strategy increased the number of appropriate antibiotic use from 7,843/10,000 to 10,000/10,000 simulations.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that a test then treat strategy for pregnant women who report a penicillin allergy is a good-value intervention.