Effectiveness of a Novel Contralaterally Controlled Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Restoring Lower Limb Motor Performance and Activities of Daily Living in Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation for Improving Motor Function After Acquired Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the effect of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation (CCFES) on motor function after acquired brain injury (ABI).

DATA SOURCES

We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Web of Science, SinoMed, CNKI, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals and Wanfang Database, from inception to December 2023.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of CCFES on motor function compared with routine rehabilitation or routine electrical stimulation after ABI. Two independent reviewers screened 894 articles for inclusion.

DATA EXTRACTION

The extracted data included study information, sample size, study population, interventions, measurement evaluated, and the test interval.

DATA SYNTHESIS

This study included 24 trials with 28 intervention-control pairs and 1148 participants with stroke. Meta-analysis showed that the CCFES group demonstrated more significant improvement than the control group in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale (FMA) (standardized mean difference [SMD]=0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.44-0.88, P<.001), active range of motion (AROM) (SMD=0.77, 95% CI=0.54-1.01, P<.001), modified Barthel Index (MBI) (SMD=0.55, 95% CI=0.29-0.81, P<.001), Motricity Index (MI) (SMD=0.60, 95% CI=0.26-0.94, P<.001) surface electromyography (sEMG) (SMD=0.81, 95% CI=0.56-1.06, P<.001), and Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) (SMD=0.53, 95% CI=0.24-0.83, P<.001). The CCFES group showed no significant improvement over the control group in the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) (SMD=0.24, 95% CI=-0.10-0.58, P=.17).

CONCLUSIONS

Our synthesized evidence suggests that CCFES could improve motor function in patients with stroke. More RCTs with other patients with brain injury are required to provide future evidence on the therapy effect of CCFES and make a contribution to the uniform standard of CCFES.

Early screening of post-stroke fall risk: A simultaneous multimodal fNIRs-EMG study

BACKGROUND

Stroke is the third-leading cause of death and disability, and poststroke falls (PSF) are common at all stages after stroke and could even lead to injuries or death. Brain information from functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRs) may precede conventional imaging and clinical symptoms but has not been systematically considered in PSF risk prediction. This study investigated the difference in brain activation between stroke patients and healthy subjects, and this study was aimed to explore fNIRs biomarkers for early screening of PSF risk by comparing the brain activation in patients at and not at PSF risk.

METHODS

In this study, we explored the differences in brain activation and connectivity between stroke and healthy subjects by synchronizing the detection of fNIRs and EMG tests during simple (usual sit-to-stand) and difficult tasks (sit-to-stand based on EMG feedback). Thereby further screened for neuroimaging biomarkers for early prediction of PSF risk by comparing brain activation variability in poststroke patients at and not at fall risk during simple and difficult tasks. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity were used to compare the diagnostic effect.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients (22 not at and 18 at PSF risk) and 38 healthy subjects were enrolled. As the difficulty of standing task increased, stroke patients compared with healthy subjects further increased the activation of the unaffected side of supplementary motor area (H-SMA) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex-Brodmann area 46 (H-DLFC-BA46) but were unable to increase functional connectivity (Group*Task: p < 0.05). More importantly, the novel finding showed that hyperactivation of the H-SMA during a simple standing task was a valid fNIRs predictor of PSF risk [AUROC 0.74, p = 0.010, sensitivity 77.8%, specificity 63.6%].

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided novel evidence that fNIR-derived biomarkers could early predict PSF risk that can facilitate the widespread use of real-time assessment tools in early screening and rehabilitation. Meanwhile, this study demonstrated that the higher brain activation and inability to increase the brain functional connectivity in stroke patients during difficult task indicated the inefficient use of brain resources.

The efficacy of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation compared to conventional neuromuscular electrical stimulation for recovery of limb function following a stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Limb paresis following a stroke is a common sequela that can impact patients' quality of life. Many rehabilitation strategies targeting the restoration of motor function exist. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the effects of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation (CCFES) as a modality for limb rehabilitation. Unlike conventional neuromuscular electrical simulation (NMES), the contra-laterality in CCFES is achieved by two methods a bend angle sensor or an electromyographic bridge (EMGB) method, both of which targets signals from the unaffected limb.

Method

This review study was performed following the preferred reporting item for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Records that met the inclusion criteria were extracted from the following databases: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Additional articles were also retrieved from clinicaltrials.gov and China/Asia on Demand (CAOD). Only randomized controlled studies (RCTs) were included.

Results

Sixteen RCTs met the inclusion criteria, and 14 of which were included in the quantitative analysis (meta-analysis). The results of the analysis show that when compared to conventional NMES, CCFES displayed a better improvement in the upper extremity Fugl-Meyer assessment (UEFMA) (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.21, 0.62, p-value <0.0001, I2 = 15%, GRADE: moderate), box and blocks test (BBT) (SMD = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.10, 0.86, p-value = 0.01, I2 = 0%, GRADE: very low), modified Barthel index (mBI) (SMD = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.71, p-value = 0.002, I2 = 0%, GRADE: moderate), active range of motion (AROM) (SMD = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.29, 0.94, p-value = 0.0002, I2 = 23%, GRADE: moderate), and surface electromyography (sEMG) scores (SMD = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.90, p-value = 0.008, I2 = 0%, GRADE: low). The results of the subgroup analysis for the type of sensor used in CCFES shows that an EMGB (SMD = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.33, 0.84, p-value <0.00001, I2 = 7%) is more effective than a bend angle sensor (SMD = 0.17, 95% CI: -0.12, 0.45, p-value = 0.25, I2 = 0%).

Conclusion

The results of this study provide strong evidence that shows CCFES being a better electrical stimulation modality compared to conventional NMES. This could be explained by the fact that CCFES is bilateral in nature which offers a platform for better neuroplasticity following a stroke. There is still a need for high-quality studies with a standardized approach comparing CCFES to other treatment modalities.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=342670, identifier CRD42022342670.

Top-down and bottom-up stimulation techniques combined with action observation treatment in stroke rehabilitation: a perspective

Stroke is a central nervous system disease that causes structural lesions and functional impairments of the brain, resulting in varying types, and degrees of dysfunction. The bimodal balance-recovery model (interhemispheric competition model and vicariation model) has been proposed as the mechanism of functional recovery after a stroke. We analyzed how combinations of motor observation treatment approaches, transcranial electrical (TES) or magnetic (TMS) stimulation and peripheral electrical (PES) or magnetic (PMS) stimulation techniques can be taken as accessorial physical therapy methods on symptom reduction of stroke patients. We suggest that top-down and bottom-up stimulation techniques combined with action observation treatment synergistically might develop into valuable physical therapy strategies in neurorehabilitation after stroke. We explored how TES or TMS intervention over the contralesional hemisphere or the lesioned hemisphere combined with PES or PMS of the paretic limbs during motor observation followed by action execution have super-additive effects to potentiate the effect of conventional treatment in stroke patients. The proposed paradigm could be an innovative and adjunctive approach to potentiate the effect of conventional rehabilitation treatment, especially for those patients with severe motor deficits.

Effectiveness of cerebellar vermis intermittent theta-burst stimulation in improving trunk control and balance function for patients with subacute stroke: a randomised controlled trial protocol

INTRODUCTION

Balance impairments frequently occur after stroke. Achieving effective core trunk stability is the key to improving balance ability. However, there is still a lack of advanced well-defined rehabilitation protocols for balance improvement in patients with stroke. Intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) is a non-invasive brain activity modulation strategy that can produce long-term potentiation. The cerebellar vermis is a fundamental structure involved in balance and motor control. However, no study has demonstrated the therapeutic effect and potential mechanism of cerebellar vermis iTBS on balance after stroke.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study will be a prospective single-centre double-blind randomised controlled clinical trial with a 3-week intervention and 3-week follow-up. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated to the experimental group or the control group in a 1:1 ratio. After routine conventional physical therapy, patients in the experimental group will receive cerebellar vermis iTBS, whereas patients in the control group will receive sham stimulation. The overall intervention period will be 5 days a week for 3 consecutive weeks. The outcomes will be measured at baseline (T0), 3 weeks postintervention (T1) and at the 3-week follow-up (T2). The primary outcomes are Berg Balance Scale and Trunk Impairment Scale scores. The secondary outcomes are balance test scores via the Balance Master system, muscle activation of the trunk and lower limbs via the surface electromyography recordings, cerebral cortex oxygen concentrations measured via the resting-state functional near-infrared spectroscopy, Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity and Barthel index scores.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the West China Hospital Clinical Trials and Biomedical Ethics Committee of Sichuan University. All participants will sign the informed consent form voluntarily. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at academic conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2200065369.

Contralaterally controlled neuromuscular electrical stimulation-induced changes in functional connectivity in patients with stroke assessed using functional near-infrared spectroscopy

Contralaterally controlled neuromuscular electrical stimulation (CCNMES) is an innovative therapy in stroke rehabilitation which has been verified in clinical studies. However, the underlying mechanism of CCNMES are yet to be comprehensively revealed. The main purpose of this study was to apply functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to compare CCNMES-related changes in functional connectivity (FC) within a cortical network after stroke with those induced by neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) when performing wrist extension with hemiplegic upper extremity. Thirty-one stroke patients with right hemisphere lesion were randomly assigned to CCNMES (n = 16) or NMES (n = 15) groups. Patients in both groups received two tasks: 10-min rest and 10-min electrical stimulation task. In each task, the cerebral oxygenation signals in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), bilateral primary motor cortex (M1), and primary sensory cortex (S1) were measured by a 35-channel fNIRS. Compared with NMES, FC between ipsilesional M1 and contralesional M1/S1 were significantly strengthened during CCNMES. Additionally, significantly higher coupling strengths between ipsilesional PFC and contralesional M1/S1 were observed in the CCNMES group. Our findings suggest that CCNMES promotes the regulatory functions of ipsilesional prefrontal and motor areas as well as contralesional sensorimotor areas within the functional network in patients with stroke.