Screening and Identification of Key Biomarkers in Lower Grade Glioma via Bioinformatical Analysis

Prognostic Values of Core Genes in Pilocytic Astrocytom

BACKGROUND

Pilocytic astrocytoma (PA) is the most common primary brain tumor in children and adolescents. Treatment strategy largely depends on its key genes and molecular mutations. This study aimed to identify potential biomarkers of PA closely related to its prognosis.

METHODS

The gene expression profiles (series numbers GSE50161, GSE66354, and GSE86574) of PA and normal brain tissues were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. The Gene Expression Omnibus2R was used to identify differentially expressed genes. The overlapping differentially expressed genes were subjected to Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analyses using the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) database. A protein-protein interaction network was constructed using Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING) and Cytoscape. The Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis 2 (GEPIA2) tool analyzed the impact of hub genes on PA prognosis based on the Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Compared with normal brain tissues (n = 36), a total of 37 upregulated and 144 downregulated genes were identified in PA (n = 40). In the protein-protein interaction network construction and GEPIA2 survival analysis, 2 of the top 10 hub genes were significantly associated with decreased overall survival of PA patients, namely Gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptor alpha 2 (hazard ratio  =  2.8, P  <  0.01) and regulating synaptic membrane exocytosis protein 1) (hazard ratio =  3.2, P  <  0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This bioinformatics analysis reveals that low expression of Gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptor alpha 2 and regulating synaptic membrane exocytosis protein 1 is associated with a favorable prognosis for PA patients. These 2 hub genes could be novel biomarkers for prognosis assessment, furthermore a key element for treatment decisions in the future.

An in silico approach to the identification of diagnostic and prognostic markers in low-grade gliomas

Low-grade gliomas (LGG) are central nervous system Grade I tumors, and as they progress they are becoming one of the deadliest brain tumors. There is still great need for timely and accurate diagnosis and prognosis of LGG. Herein, we aimed to identify diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers associated with LGG, by employing diverse computational approaches. For this purpose, differential gene expression analysis on high-throughput transcriptomics data of LGG versus corresponding healthy brain tissue, derived from TCGA and GTEx, respectively, was performed. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis of the detected differentially expressed genes was carried out in order to identify modules of co-expressed genes significantly correlated with LGG clinical traits. The genes comprising these modules were further used to construct gene co-expression and protein-protein interaction networks. Based on the network analyses, we derived a consensus of eighteen hub genes, namely, CD74, CD86, CDC25A, CYBB, HLA-DMA, ITGB2, KIF11, KIFC1, LAPTM5, LMNB1, MKI67, NCKAP1L, NUSAP1, SLC7A7, TBXAS1, TOP2A, TYROBP, and WDFY4. All detected hub genes were up-regulated in LGG, and were also associated with unfavorable prognosis in LGG patients. The findings of this study could be applicable in the clinical setting for diagnosing and monitoring LGG.

A Survey of Biological Data in a Big Data Perspective

The amount of available data is continuously growing. This phenomenon promotes a new concept, named big data. The highlight technologies related to big data are cloud computing (infrastructure) and Not Only SQL (NoSQL; data storage). In addition, for data analysis, machine learning algorithms such as decision trees, support vector machines, artificial neural networks, and clustering techniques present promising results. In a biological context, big data has many applications due to the large number of biological databases available. Some limitations of biological big data are related to the inherent features of these data, such as high degrees of complexity and heterogeneity, since biological systems provide information from an atomic level to interactions between organisms or their environment. Such characteristics make most bioinformatic-based applications difficult to build, configure, and maintain. Although the rise of big data is relatively recent, it has contributed to a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of life. The main goal of this article is to provide a concise and reliable survey of the application of big data-related technologies in biology. As such, some fundamental concepts of information technology, including storage resources, analysis, and data sharing, are described along with their relation to biological data.