High SUVs Have More Robust Repeatability in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Results from a Prospective Test-Retest Cohort Imaged with 18F-DCFPyL

Deep learning-based whole-body PSMA PET/CT attenuation correction utilizing Pix-2-Pix GAN

PURPOSE

Sequential PET/CT studies oncology patients can undergo during their treatment follow-up course is limited by radiation dosage. We propose an artificial intelligence (AI) tool to produce attenuation-corrected PET (AC-PET) images from non-attenuation-corrected PET (NAC-PET) images to reduce need for low-dose CT scans.

METHODS

A deep learning algorithm based on 2D Pix-2-Pix generative adversarial network (GAN) architecture was developed from paired AC-PET and NAC-PET images. 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET-CT studies from 302 prostate cancer patients, split into training, validation, and testing cohorts (n = 183, 60, 59, respectively). Models were trained with two normalization strategies: Standard Uptake Value (SUV)-based and SUV-Nyul-based. Scan-level performance was evaluated by normalized mean square error (NMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), structural similarity index (SSIM), and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). Lesion-level analysis was performed in regions-of-interest prospectively from nuclear medicine physicians. SUV metrics were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), repeatability coefficient (RC), and linear mixed-effects modeling.

RESULTS

Median NMSE, MAE, SSIM, and PSNR were 13.26%, 3.59%, 0.891, and 26.82, respectively, in the independent test cohort. ICC for SUVmax and SUVmean were 0.88 and 0.89, which indicated a high correlation between original and AI-generated quantitative imaging markers. Lesion location, density (Hounsfield units), and lesion uptake were all shown to impact relative error in generated SUV metrics (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The Pix-2-Pix GAN model for generating AC-PET demonstrates SUV metrics that highly correlate with original images. AI-generated PET images show clinical potential for reducing the need for CT scans for attenuation correction while preserving quantitative markers and image quality.

An Automated Deep Learning-Based Framework for Uptake Segmentation and Classification on PSMA PET/CT Imaging of Patients with Prostate Cancer

Uptake segmentation and classification on PSMA PET/CT are important for automating whole-body tumor burden determinations. We developed and evaluated an automated deep learning (DL)-based framework that segments and classifies uptake on PSMA PET/CT. We identified 193 [18F] DCFPyL PET/CT scans of patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer from two institutions, including 137 [18F] DCFPyL PET/CT scans for training and internally testing, and 56 scans from another institution for external testing. Two radiologists segmented and labelled foci as suspicious or non-suspicious for malignancy. A DL-based segmentation was developed with two independent CNNs. An anatomical prior guidance was applied to make the DL framework focus on PSMA-avid lesions. Segmentation performance was evaluated by Dice, IoU, precision, and recall. Classification model was constructed with multi-modal decision fusion framework evaluated by accuracy, AUC, F1 score, precision, and recall. Automatic segmentation of suspicious lesions was improved under prior guidance, with mean Dice, IoU, precision, and recall of 0.700, 0.566, 0.809, and 0.660 on the internal test set and 0.680, 0.548, 0.749, and 0.740 on the external test set. Our multi-modal decision fusion framework outperformed single-modal and multi-modal CNNs with accuracy, AUC, F1 score, precision, and recall of 0.764, 0.863, 0.844, 0.841, and 0.847 in distinguishing suspicious and non-suspicious foci on the internal test set and 0.796, 0.851, 0.865, 0.814, and 0.923 on the external test set. DL-based lesion segmentation on PSMA PET is facilitated through our anatomical prior guidance strategy. Our classification framework differentiates suspicious foci from those not suspicious for cancer with good accuracy.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Ligand Therapy: What the Radiologist Needs to Know

The discovery and clinical development of radiolabeled small-molecule ligands targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has had a profound influence on the field of nuclear medicine. Such agents have been successfully deployed for both imaging and therapeutic applications. In particular, PSMA radioligand therapy (PRLT) has been shown to be a life-prolonging therapy for men with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer and has also brought nuclear medicine physicians and nuclear radiologists into the forefront of direct patient care. In this review, we will discuss the clinical study data regarding the efficacy and toxicities related to PRLT, outline the key personnel that any center offering PRLT should have, offer salient clinical examples, and provide an overview of future directions for PRLT. As PRLT continues to evolve as a treatment modality, it is paramount that nuclear medicine physicians and nuclear radiologists understand the clinical context, management implications, and practical aspects so as to best deliver high-value care to patients.

PSMA PET/CT for Response Assessment of 177Lu-PSMA Therapy

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT has been widely integrated into the management of prostate cancer (PCa) patients with biochemical recurrence, is increasingly used for initial staging in high-risk patients prior to surgery or to identify candidates for PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT). To date, monitoring response in PCa patients in prospective studies remains the domain of conventional imaging, such as magnetic resonance/CT or bone scintigraphy. With the increasing use of PSMA-targeted PET/CT in PCa, however, varying criteria based on molecular imaging have been established to define progressive disease, including "PSMA PET Progression Criteria," "Response evaluation criteria in PSMA PET/CT (RECIP 1.0)" or consensus statements of respective societies. In the present review, we will discuss the current status of PSMA PET/CT for response monitoring, focusing on PSMA RLT with [177Lu]Lu-labeled PSMA ligands, along with a head-to-head comparison of recently published response criteria.

Prospective inter- and intra-tracer repeatability analysis of radiomics features in [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [18F]F-PSMA-1007 PET scans in metastatic prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to quantify both the intra- and intertracer repeatability of lesion-level radiomics features in [68Ga]Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 and [18F]F-PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography (PET) scans.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) were prospectively recruited for the study and randomised to one of three test-retest groups: (i) intratracer [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET, (ii) intratracer [18F]F-PSMA-1007 PET or (iii) intertracer between [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [18F]F-PSMA-1007 PET. Four conventional PET metrics (standardised uptake value (SUV)max, SUVmean, SUVtotal and volume) and 107 radiomics features were extracted from 75 lesions and assessed using the repeatability coefficient (RC) and the ICC. Radiomic feature repeatability was also quantified after the application of 16 filters to the PET image.

RESULTS

Test-retest scans were taken a median of 5 days apart (range: 2-7 days). SUVmean demonstrated the lowest RC limits of the conventional features, with RCs of 7.9%, 14.2% and 24.7% for the [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET, [18F]F-PSMA-1007 PET, and intertracer groups, respectively. 69%, 66% and 9% of all radiomics features had good or excellent ICC values (ICC ≥ 0.75) for the same groups. Feature repeatability therefore diminished considerably for the intertracer group relative to intratracer groups.

CONCLUSION

In this study, robust biomarkers for each tracer group that can be used in subsequent clinical studies were identified. Overall, the repeatability of conventional and radiomic features were found to be substantially lower for the intertracer group relative to both intratracer groups, suggesting that assessing patient response quantitatively should be done using the same radiotracer where possible.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Intertracer biomarker repeatability limits are significantly larger than intratracer limits.

Lack of repeatability of radiomic features derived from PET scans: Results from a 18 F-DCFPyL test-retest cohort

OBJECTIVES

PET-based radiomic metrics are increasingly utilized as predictive image biomarkers. However, the repeatability of radiomic features on PET has not been assessed in a test-retest setting. The prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted compound ¹⁸ F-DCFPyL is a high-affinity, high-contrast PET agent that we utilized in a test-retest cohort of men with metastatic prostate cancer (PC).

METHODS

Data of 21 patients enrolled in a prospective clinical trial with histologically proven PC underwent two ¹⁸ F-DCFPyL PET scans within 7 days, using identical acquisition and reconstruction parameters. Sites of disease were segmented and a set of 29 different radiomic parameters were assessed on both scans. We determined repeatability of quantification by using Pearson's correlations, within-subject coefficient of variation (wCOV), and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 230 lesions (177 bone, 38 lymph nodes, 15 others) were assessed on both scans. For all investigated radiomic features, a broad range of inter-scan correlation was found (r, 0.07-0.95), with acceptable reproducibility for entropy and homogeneity (wCOV, 16.0% and 12.7%, respectively). On Bland-Altman analysis, no systematic increase or decrease between the scans was observed for either parameter (±1.96 SD: 1.07/-1.30, 0.23/-0.18, respectively). The remaining 27 tested radiomic metrics, however, achieved unacceptable high wCOV (≥21.7%).

CONCLUSION

Many common radiomic features derived from a test-retest PET study had poor repeatability. Only Entropy and homogeneity achieved good repeatability, supporting the notion that those image biomarkers may be incorporated in future clinical trials. Those radiomic features based on high frequency aspects of images appear to lack the repeatability on PET to justify further study.