Diagnostic Value of Aortic Dissection Risk Score, Coagulation Function, and Laboratory Indexes in Acute Aortic Dissection

Diagnostic accuracy of alternative biomarkers for acute aortic syndrome: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

D-dimer is the only biomarker currently recommended in guidelines for the diagnosis of acute aortic syndrome (AAS). We undertook a systematic review to determine whether any alternative biomarkers could be useful in AAS diagnosis.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases (including MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library) from inception to February 2024. Diagnostic studies were eligible if they examined biomarkers other than D-dimer for diagnosing AAS compared with a reference standard test in people presenting to the ED with symptoms of AAS. Case-control studies were identified but excluded due to high risk of bias. Selection of studies, data extraction and risk of bias assessments using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool were undertaken independently by at least two reviewers. We used narrative synthesis to summarise the findings.

RESULTS

We identified 2017 citations, included 13 cohort studies (n=76-999), and excluded 38 case-control studies. Methodological quality was variable, with most included studies having unclear or high risk of bias and applicability concerns in at least one item of the QUADAS-2 tool. Only two studies reported biomarkers with sensitivity and specificity comparable to D-dimer (ie, >90% and >50%, respectively). Wang et al reported 99.1% sensitivity and 84.9% specificity for soluble ST2; however, these findings conflicted with estimates of 58% sensitivity and 70.8% specificity reported in another study. Chun and Siu reported 95.6% sensitivity and 56.1% specificity for neutrophil count, but this has not been confirmed elsewhere.

CONCLUSION

There are many potential alternative biomarkers for AAS but few have been evaluated in more than one study, study designs are often weak and reported biomarker accuracy is modest or inconsistent between studies. Alternative biomarkers to D-dimer are not ready for routine clinical use.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022252121.

The association of coagulation indicators with in-hospital acute kidney injury and malignant events of patients with acute aortic dissection: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a prevalent complication of acute aortic dissection (AAD) and is associated with poor outcomes. The onset of AAD may result in endothelial injury due to the formation of the false lumen, which can activate the coagulation pathway and lead to coagulation dysfunction. It serves as a valuable diagnostic and prognostic marker for AAD, but also plays a role in the pathological mechanisms underlying AKI. We aimed to investigate the potential value of coagulation indicators at admission for assessing in-hospital AKI and malignant events after AAD.

METHODS

We identified patients with AAD admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College from January 2015 to October 2020 and divided them into two groups according to coagulation function. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to analyze the association between coagulation indicators and AKI and malignant events in patients with AAD. Chi-squared or Fisher exact test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to assess the value of coagulation indicators in predicting in-hospital AKI and malignant events.

RESULTS

A total of 487 patients were enrolled in this study, including 309 cases with normal coagulation. After the multivariable adjustment, the incidence of in-hospital AKI in the abnormal coagulation group was significantly higher [model 1: 2.061 (1.214-3.501), P=0.007; model 2: 1.833 (1.058-3.177), P=0.031; model 3: 1.836 (1.048-3.216), P=0.034]. The incidence of malignant events was higher in the abnormal prothrombin time (PT) group [model 1: 4.283 (0.983-18.665), P=0.053; model 2: 7.342 (1.467-36.749), P=0.015; model 3: 6.996 (1.377-35.537), P=0.019]. Chi-squared and Fisher exact test showed that PT and abnormal coagulation score (ACS) were statistically different among the AKI groups and malignant event groups. Under ROC analysis, coagulation indicators were helpful to predict AKI (AUC =0.668; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirmed the presence of coagulation dysfunction is associated with an increased risk of AKI and malignant events. It suggested the severity of coagulation dysfunction is positively correlated with the incidence of in-hospital AKI in AAD patients. These results highlight the importance of considering coagulation dysfunction as a potential mechanism underlying AKI and malignant events after AAD.

Evaluation of qSOFA score, and conjugated bilirubin and creatinine levels for predicting 28‑day mortality in patients with sepsis

Sepsis is a dangerous disease that develops rapidly and has a high mortality rate. A timely and accurate assessment of the patient's condition is beneficial in improving prognosis and reducing mortality. Therefore, the present study was designed to investigate the potential association between quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) scores and biochemical indicators, such as conjugated bilirubin (CB) and creatinine levels, with the 28-day prognosis of patients with sepsis in a retrospective observational study. All cases were divided into survival and non-survival groups on the 28th day after diagnosis. The qSOFA scores, and CB and creatinine levels were significantly higher in the non-survival group than in the survival group (both P<0.01). Cox regression models identified CB [hazard ratio (HR), 1.006; P=0.002] and creatinine levels (HR, 1.002; P=0.024) as independent factors affecting 28-day mortality. The area under the curve (AUC) for CB and creatinine levels plus qSOFA score was 0.792 (95% confidence interval, 0.745-0.834), which was larger than the values for CB level, creatinine level and qSOFA score alone (all P<0.01) in the prognosis of 28-day mortality. The cut-off value of CB and creatinine levels plus qSOFA score for the 28-day mortality was 0.275 (-2.466 + 0.012 x CB + 0.002 x creatinine + 1.289 x qSOFA). Patients with lower combined predictor values had a better prognosis as demonstrated by Kaplan-Meier survival curves (log-rank test, 10.060; P=0.002). In both the septic shock and sepsis groups, the combined predictor value was higher in the non-survival group than in the survival group (P<0.001). Therefore, an increase in the combined predictor value of CB and creatinine levels plus qSOFA score may be an important predictor of disease progression and prognosis in patients with sepsis and septic shock.