Development of a Risk Score Model for Osteosarcoma Based on DNA Methylation-Driven Differentially Expressed Genes

Integration of single-cell RNA sequencing and bulk RNA sequencing to reveal an immunogenic cell death-related 5-gene panel as a prognostic model for osteosarcoma

Background

Despite the comparatively low prevalence of osteosarcoma (OS) compared to other cancer types, metastatic OS has a poor overall survival rate of fewer than 30%. Accumulating data has shown the crucial functions of immunogenic cell death (ICD) in various cancers; nevertheless, the relationship between ICD and OS was not previously well understood. This research aims to determine the function of ICD in OS and construct an ICD-based prognostic panel.

Methods

Single cell RNA sequencing data from GSE162454 dataset distinguished malignant cells from normal cells in OS. The discrepancy in ICD scores and corresponding gene expression was intensively explored between malignant cells and normal cells. Using the RNA sequencing data of the TARGET-OS, GSE16091, GSE21257, and GSE39058 datasets, the molecular subtype of OS was determined by clustering seventeen ICD-related genes obtained from the literature. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between different molecular subtypes were identified to develop a novel ICD-associated prognostic panel.

Results

The malignant cells had a remarkable decrease in the ICD scores and corresponding gene expression compared with normal cells. A total of 212 OS patients were successfully stratified into two subtypes: C1 and C2. C1-like OS patients were characterized by better prognostic outcomes, overexpression of ICD genes, activation of the ICD pathway, high inflitration abundance of immunocytes, and low expression levels of immune checkpoint genes (ICGs); however, the reverse is true in C2-like OS patients. Utilizing the limma programme in R, the DEGs between two subtypes were determined, and a 5-gene risk panel consisting of BAMBI, TMCC2, NOX4, DKK1, and CBS was developed through LASSO-Cox regression analysis. The internal- and external-verification cohorts were employed to verify the efficacy and precision of the risk panel. The AUC values of ROC curves indicated excellent prognostic prediction values of our risk panel.

Conclusions

Overall, ICD represented a protective factor against OS, and our 5-gene risk panel serving as a biomarker could effectively evaluate the prognostic risk in patients with OS.