A Torn ACL Mapping in Knee MRI Images Using Deep Convolution Neural Network with Inception-v3

MRI deep learning models for assisted diagnosis of knee pathologies: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Despite showing encouraging outcomes, the precision of deep learning (DL) models using different convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for diagnosis remains under investigation. This systematic review aims to summarise the status of DL MRI models developed for assisting the diagnosis of a variety of knee abnormalities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five databases were systematically searched, employing predefined terms such as 'Knee AND 3D AND MRI AND DL'. Selected inclusion criteria were used to screen publications by title, abstract, and full text. The synthesis of results was performed by two independent reviewers.

RESULTS

Fifty-four articles were included. The studies focused on anterior cruciate ligament injuries (n = 19, 36%), osteoarthritis (n = 9, 17%), meniscal injuries (n = 13, 24%), abnormal knee appearance (n = 11, 20%), and other (n = 2, 4%). The DL models in this review primarily used the following CNNs: ResNet (n = 11, 21%), VGG (n = 6, 11%), DenseNet (n = 4, 8%), and DarkNet (n = 3, 6%). DL models showed high-performance metrics compared to ground truth. DL models for the detection of a specific injury outperformed those by up to 4.5% for general abnormality detection.

CONCLUSION

Despite the varied study designs used among the reviewed articles, DL models showed promising outcomes in the assisted detection of selected knee pathologies by MRI. This review underscores the importance of validating these models with larger MRI datasets to close the existing gap between current DL model performance and clinical requirements.

KEY POINTS

Question What is the status of DL model availability for knee pathology detection in MRI and their clinical potential? Findings Pathology-specific DL models reported higher accuracy compared to DL models for the detection of general abnormalities of the knee. DL model performance was mainly influenced by the quantity and diversity of data available for model training. Clinical relevance These findings should encourage future developments to improve patient care, support personalised diagnosis and treatment, optimise costs, and advance artificial intelligence-based medical imaging practices.

Improving inceptionV4 model based on fractional-order snow leopard optimization algorithm for diagnosing of ACL tears

In the current research study, a new method is presented to diagnose Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) tears by introducing an optimized version of the InceptionV4 model. Our proposed methodology utilizes a custom-made variant of the Snow Leopard Optimization Algorithm, known as the Fractional-order Snow Leopard Optimization Algorithm (FO-LOA), to extract essential features from knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images. This results in a substantial improvement in the accuracy of ACL tear detection. By effectively extracting critical features from knee MRI images, our proposed methodology significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy, potentially reducing false negatives and false positives. The enhanced model based on FO-LOA underwent thorough testing using the MRNet dataset, demonstrating exceptional performance metrics including an accuracy rate of 98.00%, sensitivity of 98.00%, precision of 97.00%, specificity of 98.00%, F1-score of 98.00%, and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 88.00%. These findings surpass current methodologies like Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Inception-v3, Deep Belief Networks and Improved Honey Badger Algorithm (DBN/IHBA), integration of the CNN with an Amended Cooking Training-based Optimizer version (CNN/ACTO), Self-Supervised Representation Learning (SSRL), signifying a significant breakthrough in ACL injury diagnosis. Using FO-SLO to optimize the InceptionV4 framework shows promise in improving the accuracy of ACL tear identification, enabling prompt and efficient treatment interventions.

Medical Imaging Applications Developed Using Artificial Intelligence Demonstrate High Internal Validity Yet Are Limited in Scope and Lack External Validation

PURPOSE

To (1) review definitions and concepts necessary to interpret applications of deep learning (DL; a domain of artificial intelligence that leverages neural networks to make predictions on media inputs such as images) and (2) identify knowledge and translational gaps in the literature to provide insight into specific areas for improvement as adoption of this technology continues.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the literature was performed in December 2023 for articles regarding the use of DL in sports medicine. For each study, information regarding the joint of focus, specific anatomic structure/pathology to which DL was applied, imaging modality utilized, source of images used for model training and testing, data set size, model performance, and whether the DL model was externally validated was recorded. A numerical scale was used to rate each DL model's clinical impact, with 1 corresponding to proof-of-concept studies with little to no direct clinical impact and 5 corresponding to practice-changing clinical impact and ready for clinical deployment.

RESULTS

Fifty-five studies were identified, all of which were published within the past 5 years, while 82% were published within the past 3 years. Of the DL models identified, 84% were developed for classification tasks, 9% for automated measurements, and 7% for segmentation. A total of 62% of studies utilized magnetic resonance imaging as the imaging modality, 25% radiographs, and 7% ultrasound, while 1 study each used computed tomography, arthroscopic images, or arthroscopic video. Sixty-five percent of studies focused on the detection of tears (anterior cruciate ligament [ACL], rotator cuff [RC], and meniscus). The diagnostic performance of ACL tears, as determined by the area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC), ranged from 0.81 to 0.99 for ACL tears (excellent to near perfect), 0.83 to 0.94 for RC tears (excellent), and from 0.75 to 0.96 for meniscus tears (acceptable to excellent). In addition, 3 studies focused on detection of cartilage lesions had AUROC ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 (excellent performance). However, only 4 (7%) studies externally validated their models, suggesting that they may not be generalizable or may not perform well when applied to populations other than that used to develop the model. Finally, the mean clinical impact score was 2 (range, 1-3) on scale of 1 to 5, corresponding to limited clinical applicability.

CONCLUSIONS

DL models in orthopaedic sports medicine show generally excellent performance (high internal validity) but require external validation to facilitate clinical deployment. In addition, current models have low clinical applicability and fail to advance the field due to a focus on routine tasks and a narrow conceptual framework.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, scoping review of Level I to IV studies.

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives

The remarkable progress in data aggregation and deep learning algorithms has positioned artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to revolutionize the field of medicine. AI is becoming more and more prevalent in the healthcare sector, and its impact on orthopedic surgery is already evident in several fields. This review aims to examine the literature that explores the comprehensive clinical relevance of AI-based tools utilized before, during, and after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The review focuses on current clinical applications and future prospects in preoperative management, encompassing risk prediction and diagnostics; intraoperative tools, specifically navigation, identifying complex anatomic landmarks during surgery; and postoperative applications in terms of postoperative care and rehabilitation. Additionally, AI tools in educational and training settings are presented. Orthopedic surgeons are showing a growing interest in AI, as evidenced by the applications discussed in this review, particularly those related to ACL injury. The exponential increase in studies on AI tools applicable to the management of ACL tears promises a significant future impact in its clinical application, with growing attention from orthopedic surgeons.

Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Using Squeeze and Excitation Network with Deep Learning

In the domain of remote sensing, the classification of hyperspectral image (HSI) has become a popular topic. In general, the complicated features of hyperspectral data cause the precise classification difficult for standard machine learning approaches. Deep learning-based HSI classification has lately received a lot of interest in the field of remote sensing and has shown promising results. As opposed to conventional hand-crafted feature-based classification approaches, deep learning can automatically learn complicated features of HSIs with a greater number of hierarchical layers. Because HSI's data structure is complicated, applying deep learning to it is difficult. The primary objective of this research is to propose a deep feature extraction model for HSI classification. Deep networks can extricate features of spatial and spectral from HSI data simultaneously, which is advantageous for increasing the performances of the proposed system. The squeeze and excitation (SE) network is combined with convolutional neural networks (SE-CNN) in this work to increase its performance in extracting features and classifying HSI. The squeeze and excitation block is designed to improve the representation quality of a CNN. Three benchmark datasets are utilized in the experiment to evaluate the proposed model: Pavia Centre, Pavia University, and Salinas. The proposed model's performance is validated by a performance comparison with current deep transfer learning approaches such as VGG-16, Inception-v3, and ResNet-50. In terms of accuracy on each class of datasets and overall accuracy, the proposed SE-CNN model outperforms the compared models. The proposed model achieved an overall accuracy of 96.05% for Pavia University, 98.94% for Pavia Centre dataset, and 96.33% for Salinas dataset.